Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia
Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia
Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
whole, gene flow via pollen is estimated to be on average an order <strong>of</strong> magnitude greater than gene flow via seeds, and most long<br />
distance gene flow is via pollen (Petit 2004).<br />
Anthesis in <strong>grass</strong> species occurs at particular times <strong>of</strong> day, <strong>of</strong>ten in the morning or the afternoon (Connor 1986). Release <strong>of</strong><br />
pollen occurs at times <strong>of</strong> high temperatures and low humidity.There appear to be few records <strong>of</strong> stipoid anthesis times.<br />
Piptatherum holciforme flowers at night and P. virescens early in the morning (Connor 1986). Ramasamy (2008) observed most<br />
Nassella trichotoma anthesis in the morning (7-11 am) with some later in the day. The structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>grass</strong> inflorescences and<br />
flowers influence their pollen dispersal and trapping characteristics (Connor 1986). Wind is the main dispersal agent for <strong>grass</strong><br />
pollen, but insects may play some small role (Connor 1986).<br />
Rates <strong>of</strong> spread<br />
Few published records exist <strong>of</strong> the rate <strong>of</strong> change in the dimensions <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana infestations and the rates at which the plant<br />
spreads (Table 5). In New Zealand the maximum rate <strong>of</strong> dispersal on a linear front from known sources was 8 km over 59 years<br />
at Marlborough and 3.5 km over 30 years at Waipawa (Connor et al. 1993). Comparable <strong>Australia</strong>n data does not appear to be<br />
available.<br />
N. neesiana was rated by Platt et al. (2005) as having a rapid, rather than moderate or slow rate <strong>of</strong> dispersal. The ACT <strong>Weeds</strong><br />
Working Group (2002 p. 4) stated that the “rate <strong>of</strong> spread and establishment is unknown, but believed to be rapid”. However<br />
perceptions <strong>of</strong> rapid spread in <strong>Australia</strong> may be partly false, due to recognition failures (Walsh 1998).<br />
Table 5. Measured and inferred rates <strong>of</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana.<br />
Locality<br />
Distance Period Rate Notes<br />
Reference<br />
(m) (y) (m y -1 )<br />
Marlborouegh, NZ 8000 59 136 District infestation expansion Connor et al. 1993<br />
Waipawa, NZ 3500 30 117 District infestation expansion Connor et al. 1993<br />
New Zealand 120-140 With no active management Slay 2002c<br />
Hawke’s Bay NZ 3-10 5 0.6-2 Patch expansion Slay 2002c<br />
Areas (ha) Period<br />
(y)<br />
Rate<br />
(ha y -1 )<br />
Marlborough, NZ 1555-3000 14-15 101-103 District expansion Slay 2002a, 2002c<br />
(3071)<br />
hypothetical 1 5 100 Expansion at 100 m per year Slay 2002a<br />
hypothetical 1 10 350 Expansion at 100 m per year Slay 2002a<br />
Rare long-distance dispersal events (e.g. by water or human transport) are thought to contribute to accelerating rates <strong>of</strong> spread<br />
that have been recorded as plant invasions proceed (Mack and Lonsdale 2001). This is because the likelihood <strong>of</strong> successful<br />
dispersal increases in proportion to the size <strong>of</strong> the propagule pool. This factor may also be contributing to the <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />
perception.<br />
Invasion patterns<br />
Trengrove (1997) observed that N. neesiana dispersed along roadsides by slashers then invades into adjoining paddocks “in a<br />
front”. The pattern in the ACT is <strong>of</strong> movement outwards from a central Canberra source population along urban and periurban<br />
roadsides mainly via mowing and slashing, with spread outward from the linear corridors, <strong>of</strong>ten by the same means (ACT <strong>Weeds</strong><br />
Working Group 2002). Slay (2002c) listed a range <strong>of</strong> situations where infestations occur in New Zealand that are indicative <strong>of</strong><br />
seed dispersal patterns: “paddocks sown with uncertified seed between 1950 and 1980 ... holding paddocks close to the road ...<br />
the edges <strong>of</strong> farm tracks ... 1-3 m away from power poles, along fence lines or other places where stock ‘rub’ ... river banks ...<br />
around hay barns ... sheep yards”.<br />
Soil seed bank<br />
The soil seed bank may be thought <strong>of</strong> as the consequence <strong>of</strong> four different processes: dropping <strong>of</strong> individual panicle seeds, the<br />
shedding <strong>of</strong> inter-twined seed masses, the release <strong>of</strong> stem cleistogenes when the culm decays and the release <strong>of</strong> basal<br />
cleistogenes when stem bases decay.<br />
Cleistogenes enter the seed bank as the culms decompose or after fire (Groves and Whalley 2002). Culms deteriorate slowly<br />
through summer and autumn and the leaf sheaths rupture in autumn or winter, releasing stem cleistogenes (Slay 2002c). Basal<br />
cleistogenes are released after the tiller or parent plant dies and decomposes, possibly 12-18 months after mortality (Slay 2002c).<br />
Testing <strong>of</strong> panicle seeds <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana with triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (tetrazolium) reported by Puhar and Hocking (1996)<br />
indicated 80-95% viability. The seeds in general are reportedly viable for more than 12 years (Benson and McDougall 2005),<br />
“many years” (Quattrocchi 2006) or “in excess <strong>of</strong> three years” in the soil (Snell et al. 2007p. 4). Bourdôt and Ryde (1986) stated<br />
that both panicle and stem seeds have >90% viability and survive for “several years” in the soil. The soil seed bank was large<br />
and persistent in heavily infested sites investigated by Gardener on the Northern Tablelands <strong>of</strong> NSW in the 1990s (Gardener et<br />
al. 2003b).<br />
Assessments <strong>of</strong> the seed bank in seven populations in the Argentinian pampas showed it be close to zero (Gardener et al. 1996b,<br />
Gardener et al. 1997). Possible reasons for this include high levels <strong>of</strong> seed predation by ants, attack by a seed pathogen after seed<br />
shed, or rapid microbial decomposition in the soil, however the closely related Nassella clarazii (Ball) Barkworth was found to<br />
have aseed bank <strong>of</strong> c. 1200 m -2 (Gardener et al. 1996b).<br />
62