15.11.2014 Views

Risk Management and Value Creation in ... - Arabictrader.com

Risk Management and Value Creation in ... - Arabictrader.com

Risk Management and Value Creation in ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Capital Structure <strong>in</strong> Banks 179<br />

UL i<br />

=<br />

predeterm<strong>in</strong>ed period of time (usually, aga<strong>in</strong>, between<br />

time 0 <strong>and</strong> H [one] year)<br />

Unexpected Loss of the i-th credit asset as def<strong>in</strong>ed above<br />

<strong>in</strong> Equation (5.5).<br />

Therefore, consider<strong>in</strong>g a loan at the portfolio level, the contribution of<br />

a s<strong>in</strong>gle UL i<br />

to the overall portfolio risk is a function of:<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

The loan’s expected loss (EL), because default probability (PD), loss<br />

rate (LR), <strong>and</strong> exposure amount (EA) all enter the UL-equation<br />

The loan’s exposure amount (i.e., the weight of the loan <strong>in</strong> the portfolio)<br />

The correlation of the exposure to the rest of the portfolio<br />

To calculate the unexpected loss contribution 211 ULC i<br />

of a s<strong>in</strong>gle loan<br />

i analytically, we first need to determ<strong>in</strong>e the marg<strong>in</strong>al impact of the <strong>in</strong>clusion<br />

of this loan on the overall credit portfolio risk. This is done by tak<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

first partial derivative of the portfolio UL with respect to UL i<br />

(for loan i):<br />

ULMC<br />

i<br />

UL<br />

≡ ∂ ∂UL<br />

P<br />

∂( ULP<br />

)<br />

=<br />

∂UL<br />

⎛<br />

∂<br />

= ⎛ ⎜<br />

⎝ ⎜ 1 ⎞ ⎝<br />

⎟ ⋅<br />

2UL<br />

⎠<br />

i<br />

P<br />

n<br />

2 12 /<br />

= ⎛ ULP<br />

i ⎝ ⎜ 1⎞<br />

2<br />

−12<br />

/<br />

⎟ ⋅( ) ⋅<br />

2⎠<br />

n<br />

∑∑<br />

⎞<br />

UL ⋅UL<br />

ρ ⎟<br />

j k jk<br />

j= 1 k=<br />

1<br />

⎠ j=<br />

1<br />

∂UL<br />

i<br />

=<br />

n<br />

∑<br />

2<br />

∂( ULP<br />

)<br />

∂UL<br />

UL ρ<br />

UL<br />

P<br />

j<br />

i<br />

ij<br />

(5.10)<br />

where ULMC i<br />

is the marg<strong>in</strong>al contribution of loan i to the overall<br />

portfolio unexpected loss.<br />

Note that <strong>in</strong> the above formula, the marg<strong>in</strong>al contribution only depends<br />

on the (UL-) weights of the different loans <strong>in</strong> the portfolio, not on the size<br />

of the portfolio itself. In order to calculate the portfolio volatility attributable<br />

to loan i, we use the follow<strong>in</strong>g property for a marg<strong>in</strong>al change <strong>in</strong> portfolio<br />

volatility:<br />

dUL<br />

Port<br />

≡<br />

n<br />

n<br />

∂ULP<br />

⋅ dULi = ULMCi dULi<br />

∂UL ∑ ⋅<br />

i= 1 i<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

∑<br />

(5.11)<br />

211 Note that we follow the argument made by Ong (1999), p. 133, <strong>in</strong> this discussion<br />

<strong>and</strong> ignore the weights w i<br />

<strong>in</strong> the derivation of ULC. We can do so if we assume that<br />

UL i<br />

is measured <strong>in</strong> dollar terms rather than as a percentage of the overall portfolio.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!