15.11.2014 Views

Risk Management and Value Creation in ... - Arabictrader.com

Risk Management and Value Creation in ... - Arabictrader.com

Risk Management and Value Creation in ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Rationales for <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>in</strong> Banks 65<br />

While keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that we def<strong>in</strong>ed firm value <strong>in</strong> Equation (2.1) as<br />

a function of the present value of the (expected) cash flow <strong>and</strong> the appropriate<br />

discount rate, which reflects both the risk<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>and</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mix of the firm, 66 we need to establish the answer to the question of whether<br />

or not to manage risk at the corporate level along three dimensions (see<br />

Table 3.1).<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

Is the firm try<strong>in</strong>g to manage risks on behalf of well-diversified <strong>in</strong>vestors<br />

or not well-diversified <strong>in</strong>vestors (dimension A. versus B. <strong>in</strong> Table<br />

3.1)?<br />

Is the <strong>in</strong>tended risk management done through f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>struments<br />

or by changes <strong>in</strong> operations (dimension I. versus II. <strong>in</strong> Table 3.1)?<br />

Is the corporate risk management aimed at specific or systematic risks<br />

[dimension (1) versus (2) <strong>in</strong> Table 3.1]?<br />

Let us first turn to a world where firms try to manage risks on behalf<br />

of well-diversified <strong>in</strong>vestors (A. <strong>in</strong> Table 3.1). In this world, for risk management<br />

through f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>struments (I. <strong>in</strong> Table 3.1) <strong>in</strong> capital markets<br />

to affect firm value, there are the follow<strong>in</strong>g four potential scenarios (as<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> the first row of Table 3.1 <strong>and</strong> as depicted <strong>in</strong> more detail <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 3.2).<br />

Let us consider what happens if a firm tries to elim<strong>in</strong>ate specific risks<br />

on behalf of their <strong>in</strong>vestors [dimension (1) <strong>in</strong> Tables 3.1 <strong>and</strong> 3.2]. S<strong>in</strong>ce we<br />

assume <strong>in</strong> this section that typical <strong>in</strong>vestors <strong>in</strong> the firm are well-diversified,<br />

they will not be concerned with (firm-) specific risks. They can always<br />

elim<strong>in</strong>ate specific risk by diversification on their own (at no cost) <strong>and</strong> will<br />

therefore not appreciate diversification provided by the firm. Because the<br />

discount rate <strong>in</strong> Equation (2.1) only depends on systematic risk, the overall<br />

firm value is also not dependent on specific risk. There are two scenarios <strong>in</strong><br />

this sett<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

TABLE 3.1<br />

Overview of Corporate <strong>Risk</strong>-<strong>Management</strong> Scenarios<br />

Investors <strong>Risk</strong> (1) Specific (2) Systematic<br />

<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Risk</strong><br />

A. Well-diversified I. F<strong>in</strong>ancial ❶,❷ ❸,❹<br />

II. Operational ➎ ➏<br />

B. Not well-diversified I. F<strong>in</strong>ancial ❼ ❽<br />

II. Operational ➒ ❿<br />

66 See Damodaran (1997), p. 784.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!