15.11.2014 Views

Risk Management and Value Creation in ... - Arabictrader.com

Risk Management and Value Creation in ... - Arabictrader.com

Risk Management and Value Creation in ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Rationales for <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>in</strong> Banks 61<br />

money by manag<strong>in</strong>g risks, 32 they should behave as a risk-neutral agent <strong>in</strong><br />

the aggregate. 33<br />

In efficient capital markets, 34 corporate f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g decisions only reshuffle<br />

cash flows among <strong>in</strong>vestors. 35 S<strong>in</strong>ce (f<strong>in</strong>ancial) risk-management decisions<br />

are a subset of these f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g decisions, corporate risk management does<br />

not hurt, 36 but it also cannot create value. 37 <strong>Value</strong> can—accord<strong>in</strong>g to M&M—<br />

only be created on the left-h<strong>and</strong> side of the balance sheet when <strong>com</strong>panies<br />

make good <strong>in</strong>vestments that ultimately <strong>in</strong>crease (expected) operat<strong>in</strong>g cash<br />

flows. How <strong>com</strong>panies f<strong>in</strong>ance those <strong>in</strong>vestments on the right-h<strong>and</strong> side of<br />

the balance sheet—whether through debt, equity, or reta<strong>in</strong>ed earn<strong>in</strong>gs—is<br />

irrelevant <strong>in</strong> this world. 38 The f<strong>in</strong>ancial policy decisions can only affect how<br />

the value created by a <strong>com</strong>pany’s real <strong>in</strong>vestments is divided among its <strong>in</strong>vestors.<br />

But, <strong>in</strong> efficient <strong>and</strong> well-function<strong>in</strong>g capital markets, they cannot<br />

affect the overall value of those <strong>in</strong>vestments, 39 because the value of (a stream<br />

of) cash flows is determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the market <strong>and</strong> is the same for all market<br />

players.<br />

However, this does not mean that f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> risk management is<br />

redundant. It only means that the way <strong>in</strong> which it is done is irrelevant for<br />

value creation under the above assumptions, because <strong>in</strong>vestors can always<br />

undo or replicate any f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g decision by adjust<strong>in</strong>g their own portfolios 40<br />

at the same terms as the firm.<br />

Corollaries from the Neoclassical F<strong>in</strong>ance Theory<br />

with Regard to <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

Modern f<strong>in</strong>ancial theory <strong>and</strong> its rigid assumptions, as described <strong>in</strong> the previous<br />

section, have also lead to some other <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g corollaries, especially<br />

with regard to banks <strong>and</strong> their risk management.<br />

In frictionless, perfect, <strong>and</strong> <strong>com</strong>plete markets there would be no <strong>in</strong>termediation<br />

<strong>and</strong> no role for banks, 41 because everybody would contract directly<br />

with the market 42 at the same terms, as described <strong>in</strong> the traditional<br />

32 Unless they have a <strong>com</strong>petitive advantage, which banks often claim to have.<br />

33 See Raposo (1999), p. 42.<br />

34 As described by the above assumptions.<br />

35 See Fenn et al. (1997), p. 16.<br />

36 However, if risk management <strong>com</strong>es at a cost, it destroys value.<br />

37 See Schmidt <strong>and</strong> Terberger (1997), p. 61, <strong>and</strong> Stulz (2000), p. 2-4, <strong>and</strong> below <strong>in</strong><br />

more detail.<br />

38 See Economist (1996) <strong>and</strong> Fenn et al. (1997), p. 15.<br />

39 See Fenn et al. (1997), p. 16.<br />

40 See Fenn et al. (1997), p. 16.<br />

41 See Schmidt <strong>and</strong> Terberger (1997), p. 63.<br />

42 See Perridon <strong>and</strong> Ste<strong>in</strong>er (1995), p. 485.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!