15.11.2014 Views

Risk Management and Value Creation in ... - Arabictrader.com

Risk Management and Value Creation in ... - Arabictrader.com

Risk Management and Value Creation in ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

222 RISK MANAGEMENT AND VALUE CREATION IN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS<br />

We now assume for simplicity that there is only one class of equity <strong>and</strong><br />

one class of debt <strong>in</strong> the bank. At least for the debt this assumption does not<br />

seem unrealistic, because <strong>in</strong> the case when the bank approaches default,<br />

basically all debt holders will want to reclaim their liabilities at the same<br />

time (bank run), mak<strong>in</strong>g different classes of seniority <strong>and</strong> maturity less relevant.<br />

422<br />

We further assume an M&M world with respect to the value additivity<br />

423 of these two classes of debt <strong>and</strong> equity so that the f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g decision<br />

has (<strong>in</strong>itially) no impact on the total value of assets. Therefore:<br />

V = V + V<br />

(5.45)<br />

At , Et , Dt ,<br />

where V E,t<br />

= Market value of equity at time t<br />

V D,t<br />

= Market value of debt at time t<br />

V D,t<br />

= V D,T<br />

⋅ e-r' (T – t)<br />

assum<strong>in</strong>g that the debt matures at time T <strong>and</strong> that V D,t<br />

is the value of a zerocoupon<br />

bond with face value V D,T<br />

(which is equal to the book value of<br />

debt) discounted at <strong>in</strong>terest rate r' (which is typically not the risk-free rate).<br />

From that we can <strong>in</strong>fer—given that shareholders have to repay the debt<br />

holders <strong>and</strong> can then claim the rema<strong>in</strong>der of the asset value—the payoff for<br />

the shareholders at time T is:<br />

V E,T<br />

= max[(V A,T<br />

– V D,T<br />

); 0] (5.46)<br />

which is identical to the payoff structure of a call option. Thus, <strong>in</strong><br />

the simplified case, where we allow for only one class of equity <strong>and</strong> one<br />

class of outst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g debt, equity can be viewed as a call option on the<br />

underly<strong>in</strong>g assets of the firm with a strike price equal to the value of the<br />

firm’s liabilities.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce we evaluate the value of the shareholders’ claim at the time of<br />

maturity T of the debt, we can use the Black-Scholes formula for pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />

European call options to price V E<br />

at any time t before T: 424<br />

−⋅ r( T −t)<br />

V = V<br />

0<br />

⋅Nd (<br />

1) −V ⋅e ⋅Nd<br />

(<br />

2<br />

)<br />

(5.47)<br />

Et , A, DT ,<br />

422 See discussion above.<br />

423 Note that this assumption only relates to value additivity <strong>and</strong> not the overall topdown<br />

approach.<br />

424 See Hull (1997), p. 241. Of course this assumes that hedg<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g the underly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is possible <strong>and</strong> that all assets are fully tradable. Additionally, all other assumptions<br />

of the Black-Scholes world need to be met.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!