15.11.2014 Views

Risk Management and Value Creation in ... - Arabictrader.com

Risk Management and Value Creation in ... - Arabictrader.com

Risk Management and Value Creation in ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Capital Structure <strong>in</strong> Banks 223<br />

where<br />

d<br />

1<br />

⎛<br />

2<br />

VA<br />

,<br />

⎞<br />

0<br />

A<br />

⎜ r T t<br />

⎝ VDT<br />

⎠<br />

⎟ + ⎛<br />

+ σ ⎞<br />

ln ⎜<br />

⎝ 2<br />

⎟<br />

⎠<br />

⋅ ( − )<br />

,<br />

=<br />

σ ⋅ T −t<br />

A<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

d<br />

2<br />

⎛<br />

2<br />

VA<br />

,<br />

⎞<br />

0<br />

A<br />

⎜ r T t<br />

V<br />

⎟<br />

⎝ DT ⎠<br />

+<br />

⎛<br />

− σ ⎞<br />

ln ⎜<br />

2<br />

⎟<br />

⎝ ⎠<br />

⋅ ( − )<br />

,<br />

=<br />

= d1<br />

−σ<br />

A<br />

⋅ T −t<br />

σ ⋅ T −t<br />

A<br />

where N(⋅) = Cumulative st<strong>and</strong>ard normal probability distribution function<br />

T = Time of maturity<br />

r = <strong>Risk</strong>-free rate<br />

We use the risk-free rate as the expected rate of return here, because we<br />

are <strong>in</strong> a world of risk-neutral evaluation. 425 As can be easily seen, the Black-<br />

Scholes equation does not <strong>in</strong>clude any variables that are affected by the risk<br />

preferences of the <strong>in</strong>vestors.<br />

We can diagrammatically summarize the above as follows (see Figure<br />

5.11).<br />

As we can see <strong>in</strong> Figure 5.11, r represents the expected return on the<br />

bank’s assets <strong>in</strong> such a risk-neutral world 426 <strong>and</strong> σ A<br />

the volatility of the bank’s<br />

assets, which drive the probability that V A,T<br />

is smaller than (or equal to)<br />

V D,T<br />

<strong>and</strong> hence the probability that the bank is <strong>in</strong> default at time T.<br />

Specific Theoretical Foundations As was already <strong>in</strong>dicated, the purpose of the<br />

suggested approach is to apply the previously depicted approach to banks<br />

<strong>and</strong> turn it upside-down by us<strong>in</strong>g the default probability implied <strong>in</strong> publicly<br />

available agency rat<strong>in</strong>gs. S<strong>in</strong>ce these rat<strong>in</strong>gs try to estimate the probability<br />

of a <strong>com</strong>pany’s specific debt issue be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> default <strong>in</strong> one year’s time, we set<br />

our horizon T equal to 1. 427 However, this <strong>com</strong>plicates the analysis: Usually,<br />

we do not know for certa<strong>in</strong> how much of the total debt is due <strong>in</strong> one year’s<br />

time. 428 The only reasonable proxy we can use is the balance sheet <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

on debt due <strong>in</strong> one year. 429 However, <strong>com</strong>panies typically have the<br />

possibility of ref<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g some of their short-term debt as long-term liabili-<br />

425 See Hull (1997), pp. 239–240.<br />

426 It will later be replaced by µ, the actual return on assets.<br />

427 Other reasons are, for example, that the report<strong>in</strong>g cycle <strong>in</strong> most European countries<br />

is one year <strong>and</strong> the previously mentioned arguments <strong>in</strong> the horizon discussion.<br />

428 Deposits can be withdrawn at any time without prior notice.<br />

429 This will typically be the book value <strong>and</strong> not the required market value (that is<br />

unobservable <strong>in</strong> most of the cases).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!