Entire Document - Chris Hani District Municipality

• Management has not taken sufficient action to clear all prior year audit findings. There was no audit intervention plan
and certain matters in the management report as well as this report were also raised in prior financial years.
REPORT ON OTHER LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
Report on performance information
36. I have reviewed the performance information as set out on pages 22 to 80.
The accounting officer’s responsibility for the performance information
37. In terms of section 121(3)(c) of the MFMA, the annual report of a municipality must include the annual performance
report of the municipality, prepared by the municipality in terms of section 46 of the Local Government: Municipal
Systems Act, 2000 (Act No. 32 of 2000) (MSA).
The Auditor-General’s responsibility
38. I conducted my engagement in accordance with section 13 of the PAA read with General Notice 616 of 2008, issued
in Government Gazette No. 31057 of 15 May 2008 and section 45 of the MSA.
39. In terms of the foregoing my engagement included performing procedures of an audit nature to obtain sufficient
appropriate evidence about the performance information and related systems, processes and procedures. The
procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement.
40. I believe that the evidence I have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for the audit findings reported below.
Non-compliance with regulatory requirements
Lack of reporting on all predetermined objectives in annual report.
41. The municipality has not reported on all the predetermined objectives in accordance with the prescribed format, as
required by section 46 of the Municipal Systems Act.
42. The performance report does not include comparison with the performance in the previous year, indication of measures
taken to improve performance and the performance of each external service provider throughout the year,
Lack of effective, efficient and transparent systems and internal
controls regarding performance management
43. There is no person ultimately responsible for the co-ordination and managing of the reporting on progress against the
pre-determined objectives. In addition, the roles, responsibilities and accountabilities for developing and evaluating output
measures, collecting and compiling performance information, ensuring data integrity, monitoring and measuring data
integrity and reporting the information are not clearly documented and communicated to all staff members.
Content of integrated development plan (IDP)
44. The integrated development plan of the Chris Hani District Municipality did not include the key performance indicators
and performance targets determined in terms of its performance management system, as required by sections 26(i)
and 41(1)(b) of the MSA and regulation 12 of the Municipal Planning and Performance Management Regulations, 2001.
Internal auditing of performance measurements
45. The municipality did not develop and implement mechanisms, systems and processes for the auditing the results of
performance measurement as part of its internal audit processes and thus contravened section 45 of the MSA.
102