Entire Document - Chris Hani District Municipality

More documents

Recommendations

Info

In the 2008/2009 financial year Water Services had the following programmes: 2.2.3.1 Operations and Maintenance The Operations and Maintenance programme was allocated R46 million to service the entire district where Amatola Water Board was servicing the rural areas of the municipalities on the eastern side (Emalahleni LM, Engcobo LM, Sakhisizwe LM, Intsika Yethu LM) while those municipalities were only responsible for servicing towns. Inkwanca LM, Tsolwana LM, Lukhanji LM and Inxuba Yethemba LM were appointed as Water Service Providers on behalf of CHDM. 2.2.3.2 Refurbishment of schemes The Department of Water Affairs (DWA) funded a refurbishment programme which covered the Machubeni Water Treatment Works and Whittlesea Water Treatment works and was successfully completed. Water Services Authority (WSA) Capacity Building Programme The WSA Capacity Building Programme funded by the Department of Water Affairs assisted CHDM in developing the following strategies and documents: • Revenue Collection Strategy • Consumer Charter • Groundwater Management Plan • Electrification of diesel engines proposal • Draft Water Services Providers Business Plans for 2009-10 • Database of boreholes that are not registered or monitored. 2.2.3.3 Water Conservation and Demand Management The water conservation and demand management study was funded by DWA and was implemented at Lukhanji LM through the installation of bulk water meters at the water works and at Emalahleni LM through the identification and repair of leaks to prevent loss of water in Lady Frere town. 2.2.3.4 Future of Water Services Council resolved that at the end of the Amatola Water contract all 8 municipalities would resume the WSP function. But a need was identified that Council would have to capacitate municipalities by establishing WSP units within each LM. Councils of all local municipalities resolved to accept CHDM’s provision function, which allowed CHDM to perform only the regulatory function of being a Water Services Authority. In preparation for the new WSA/WSP arrangement the following had been achieved by the end of June 2009: • Budgets for all WSPs had been allocated • Critical posts for the WSP units were approved and advertised • Draft WSP Business Plans were completed • Draft WSP Contracts were completed • Transferred ex-DWA staff had been introduced to affected LMs for incorporation in the WSP structure and operations. 2.2.4 Roads The 3-year Service Level Agreement (roads maintenance contract) with the Department of Roads and Transport (DoT) has reached its final period as the contract will be ending at the end of March 2010. An indication was received that DoT is willing to conclude another contract. The District Municipality was commended by the community and DoT for its commitment and the high quality of the roads it has maintained. 28
2.2.4.1 Performance Report Measurable Outcome Activities/Project Description Project Leader Roads & Stormwater Routine Roads Maintenance function on the Provincial Roads network located within the Inxuba Yethemba LMA for a period of 3 years with an option to extend. Mr M Dungu Budget 2007/08 R 20 000 000 Key Deliverables • Full spectrum of routine road maintenance activities. (Mainly regravelling/re construction and blading) • Blading – 2148 Km/Regravelling (a minimum of 70 Km p/year) • Three year Service Level Agreement (1 April 2007 – 31 March 2010) • Fixed budget of 66 Million for the three years. Due Date March 2008 Percent Complete 100 % Budget Spent R20 000 000 Stakeholders/partners Challenges Department of Roads & Transport Option to extend this agreement. 2.2.5 Conclusion Staff turnover and skills retention will remain the biggest threat to the department as the trend remained the same as in the previous year. The year ahead should see the department concentrating more on its regulatory function, compared to provision, and that could be challenging in the light of the strong compliance requirement of the Department of Water Affairs. Visibility at Local Municipality and project level will be one of our targets to foster good relationships and project monitoring. 29
Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents PART ONE: INTRODU
Page 5: PART ONE INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
Page 8 and 9: providing us with your comments, vi
Page 10 and 11: SPECIAL PROGRAMMES SUCH AS YOUTH, W
Page 12 and 13: 1.3.4 Values • Respect and Divers
Page 14 and 15: 1.4 OVERVIEW OF THE MUNICIPALITY Mp
Page 16 and 17: SMME Development The District funde
Page 18 and 19: Corporate Services Directorate Ayan
Page 20 and 21: NAME OF SCHEME NUMBER OF MEMBERS AS
Page 22 and 23: organisation, can be seen to be inf
Page 24 and 25: 2.1.4.5 Power Track Vehicle Managem
Page 26 and 27: 2.2.0.1 Introduction A huge allocat
Page 30 and 31: Integrated Planning and Economic De
Page 32 and 33: The implementation of housing co-or
Page 34 and 35: Livestock Improvement (Marketing Fa
Page 36 and 37: Chris Hani Month events Measurable
Page 38 and 39: Percentage Complete 99,9% Budget Sp
Page 40 and 41: Regional/LED Strategy Measurable Ou
Page 42 and 43: Health and Community Services Direc
Page 44 and 45: Due to the success of this project
Page 46 and 47: In observing HIV/AIDS days the CHDM
Page 48 and 49: Budget 2008/09 Key Deliverables •
Page 50 and 51: Challenges& Proposed Solutions Meas
Page 52 and 53: Budget Spent R125 000 Stakeholder/
Page 54 and 55: 2.4.4 Disaster Management UNIT This
Page 56 and 57: critical areas. 2.4.4.5 INCIDENTS O
Page 58 and 59: 2.4.5 Fire and Emergency Services U
Page 60 and 61: Stakeholders/partners Challenges Me
Page 62 and 63: 2.5.0.1 Introduction For the financ
Page 64 and 65: Key Deliverables • Asset identifi
Page 66 and 67: • The possible rescheduling/timin
Page 68 and 69: Project leader T. Somtombo/ M. Mash
Page 70 and 71: Measurable outcome Activities/Proje
Page 72 and 73: 72 Good Governance
Page 74 and 75: Communication strategy The District
Page 76 and 77: Stakeholders/partners Challenges Me
Page 78 and 79:
2.6.2 INTERNAL AUDIT Services UNIT
Page 80 and 81:
Challenges Measurable outcome Execu
Page 82 and 83:
The SPU coordinating committee and
Page 84 and 85:
We would like to highlight and comm
Page 87 and 88:
3.1 Introduction to the Annual Fina
Page 89 and 90:
3.2 Audit Report to the Annual Fina
Page 91 and 92:
APPENDIX A QUALITY MATURITY MODEL O
Page 93 and 94:
3.4 MFMA - Requirements The audit r
Page 95 and 96:
IRONPORT LICENSES STATUS BEFORE 200
Page 97 and 98:
provide sufficient evidence to iden
Page 99 and 100:
25. The mayor did not submit to cou
Page 101 and 102:
No. Matter Y N •The audit committ
Page 103 and 104:
Usefulness and reliability of repor
Page 105 and 106:
The overall operating results for t
Page 107 and 108:
5. ACCUMULATED SURPLUS The balance
Page 109 and 110:
13. LONG-TERM RECEIVABLES Long-term
Page 111 and 112:
3.8 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL PERFORMA
Page 113 and 114:
3.10 CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR THE YE
Page 115 and 116:
1.1 Changes in Accounting Policy an
Page 117 and 118:
Management has considered all the o
Page 119 and 120:
2.7 Heritage Assets Heritage assets
Page 121 and 122:
The municipality did not perform im
Page 123 and 124:
Based on management’s judgement,
Page 125 and 126:
Cash includes cash-on-hand (includi
Page 127 and 128:
5.5 Derecognition of Financial Asse
Page 129 and 130:
7.3 Transitional Provisions The rec
Page 131 and 132:
9.2.8 Sale of Goods Revenue from th
Page 133 and 134:
of performance bonuses only when th
Page 135 and 136:
amount of the Municipality’s net
Page 137 and 138:
Changes in Accounting Estimates are
Page 139 and 140:
2.1 Reconciliation of Provision for
Page 141 and 142:
4.3 Cash and Cash Equivalents 2009
Page 143 and 144:
Description Land and Buildings Infr
Page 145 and 146:
The movement in Intangible Assets i
Page 147 and 148:
Study Loans In terms of the MFMA no
Page 149 and 150:
Unspent Conditional Grants have bee
Page 151 and 152:
The municipality provides certain p
Page 153 and 154:
The history of experienced adjustme
Page 155 and 156:
2009 2008 R R Present Value of Fund
Page 157 and 158:
Interest Earned on Financial Assets
Page 159 and 160:
The Financial Management Grant is p
Page 161 and 162:
20.11 Provincial: Office of the Pre
Page 163 and 164:
20.17 ProvinciaL: Department ROADS
Page 165 and 166:
Remuneration of the Director: Finan
Page 167 and 168:
25. Impairment Losses 25.1 Impairme
Page 169 and 170:
29.1 Material Losses 2009 2008 R R
Page 171 and 172:
Reserves Deferred Revenue Accumulat
Page 173 and 174:
Operating Lease Liabilities R Accum
Page 175 and 176:
The effect of the Correction of Err
Page 177 and 178:
Incident Budgeted amounts exceeded:
Page 179 and 180:
38.7 Non-Compliance with Chapter 11
Page 181 and 182:
2009 2008 R R Own Resources - - 9 4
Page 183 and 184:
The capital structure of the munici
Page 185 and 186:
Description Note ref in AFS Average
Page 187 and 188:
2009 2008 R R Long-term Receivables
Page 189 and 190:
• The statutory valuation perform
Page 191 and 192:
44. CONTINGENT ASSETS 2009 2008 R R
Page 193 and 194:
Appendices 193
Page 195 and 196:
3.13 Appendices to the AnnuAl FinAn
Page 197 and 198:
Cost / Revaluation Accumulated Depr
Page 199 and 200:
Appendix c - seGmentAl AnAlYsis oF
Page 201 and 202:
Description 2008/2009 Actual 2008/2
Page 203 and 204:
203
Page 205 and 206:
Annexure A Three Year Capital Plan
Page 207 and 208:
Project Number (1) Project Name Fun
Page 209 and 210:
Project Number (1) Project Name Fun
Page 211 and 212:
AUDIT REPORT FINDING: PROPERTY, PLA
Page 213 and 214:
AUDIT REPORT FINDING: IRREGULAR EXP
Page 215 and 216:
Acronyms 215
Page 217 and 218:
217
show all

Entire Document - Chris Hani District Municipality

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?