improving government service delivery to minority ethnic ... - NCCRI
improving government service delivery to minority ethnic ... - NCCRI
improving government service delivery to minority ethnic ... - NCCRI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Conclusion<br />
The Race Relations Amendment Act 2000 has undoubtedly brought major changes <strong>to</strong> the race equality agenda<br />
in Scotland. The requirement on all public bodies <strong>to</strong> assess the relevance all their functions <strong>to</strong> race equality and<br />
<strong>to</strong> be proactive in pursuit of race equality in respect of all those functions has undoubtedly generated a great<br />
deal of activity.<br />
199_CRE submission<br />
<strong>to</strong> Scottish Parliament’s<br />
European and External<br />
relations Committee:<br />
21 June 2005.<br />
A criticism of the RRAA has been that it has generated mountains of paper and policies but not necessarily a<br />
corresponding amount of action. Without doubt it has raised the profile of race equality and all public bodies<br />
now have a race equality scheme. The enthusiasm with which they are pursued does however depend on the<br />
commitment of leadership in the organisation as well as the skills and competence <strong>to</strong> implement them at all<br />
levels of the organisation.<br />
The demography of Scotland is rapidly changing. Not only is there an aging population but there are serious<br />
skills and labour shortages in many sec<strong>to</strong>rs. The combination of these two fac<strong>to</strong>rs means that Scotland<br />
is positively encouraging migration <strong>to</strong> Scotland through the Fresh Talent Initiative. In addition <strong>to</strong> the BME<br />
communities that, by and large, have been here for several generations, there are increasing numbers of new<br />
migrant workers arriving from the accession states.<br />
Mainstreaming is a key strategy for the Scottish Executive and the mainstreaming agenda has had an impact on<br />
policy development. However, for many in the BME voluntary sec<strong>to</strong>r, mainstreaming is seen as a paper exercise<br />
that has brought about little real change. There is still evidence of what the CRE describe as the “<strong>ethnic</strong><br />
penalty.” 199 The discrimina<strong>to</strong>ry attitudes and experiences that are faced by the BME communities, including<br />
Gypsies/Travellers and refugees will not make Scotland an attractive place <strong>to</strong> live unless the issues of racism<br />
and discrimination are addressed.<br />
Because of the legislation described in this chapter, <strong>service</strong> providers recognise the need <strong>to</strong> be proactive in<br />
pursuit of race equality and they recognise the need <strong>to</strong> be transparent in their actions. However, many are<br />
still struggling with identifying and prioritising the appropriate actions. The CRE Scotland has moved from<br />
a position of providing public bodies with individual tailored feedback <strong>to</strong> a position of expecting compliance<br />
and it is now ready <strong>to</strong> move in<strong>to</strong> its enforcement role. The role of Inspec<strong>to</strong>rates is crucial in relation <strong>to</strong> the<br />
mainstreaming agenda. There is concern that with the advent of the CEHR there will be a dilution of focus and<br />
that issues of race equality may become marginalised within the broader agenda of equality and diversity.<br />
While there is evidence of much good practice that targets the BME communities there is a need <strong>to</strong> move from<br />
a position of specialist provision that is not securely funded <strong>to</strong> one where it is recognised that the processes for<br />
delivering appropriate <strong>service</strong>s <strong>to</strong> the whole community requires differential methods.<br />
Within the BME communities there is experience of targeted <strong>service</strong>s being delivered as pilot projects that<br />
do not go on <strong>to</strong> receive mainstream funding, or of research being conducted in<strong>to</strong> the communities’ needs and<br />
then there not being adequate funding for work <strong>to</strong> meet those needs. At the conference, Lesley Irving from the<br />
Scottish Executive outlined new funding opportunities: