improving government service delivery to minority ethnic ... - NCCRI
improving government service delivery to minority ethnic ... - NCCRI
improving government service delivery to minority ethnic ... - NCCRI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 5: Ease of Providing Service for Minority Communities<br />
Numbers<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
Both<br />
None<br />
Both<br />
External<br />
Internal<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
Longstanding<br />
<strong>minority</strong><br />
<strong>ethnic</strong> groups<br />
Migrant<br />
workers<br />
Refugees<br />
and Asylum<br />
Seekers<br />
Travellers<br />
Minority Communities<br />
A range of fac<strong>to</strong>rs were given that can act <strong>to</strong> prevent or make it difficult for <strong>minority</strong> <strong>ethnic</strong> groups <strong>to</strong> access<br />
<strong>service</strong>s or <strong>to</strong> gain suitable outcomes from public authorities. Each respondent was asked <strong>to</strong> rate each fac<strong>to</strong>r<br />
from very important <strong>to</strong> not at all important (Table 6). The vast majority (52 respondents, 89%) felt that cultural<br />
issues were either very (39, 66%) or moderately (13, 22%) important. Immigration status was also seen <strong>to</strong> be<br />
important in preventing or making it difficult for <strong>minority</strong> <strong>ethnic</strong> groups <strong>to</strong> access <strong>service</strong>s. Thirty-one (53%)<br />
respondents indicated that it was very important whilst 8 (13%) said it was moderately important. Institutional<br />
racism was also rated important with 25 people (42%) stating it was very important.