29.11.2014 Views

improving government service delivery to minority ethnic ... - NCCRI

improving government service delivery to minority ethnic ... - NCCRI

improving government service delivery to minority ethnic ... - NCCRI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>improving</strong><br />

<strong>government</strong><br />

<strong>service</strong><br />

<strong>delivery</strong><br />

<strong>to</strong> <strong>minority</strong><br />

<strong>ethnic</strong> groups<br />

Chapter 1: Context 28_29<br />

34_Article 1(4).<br />

35_Article 1.<br />

36_Butler, F. (2005),<br />

Improving Public Services:<br />

Using a Human Rights<br />

Approach, Institute for<br />

Public Policy Research.<br />

37_McCrudden, C. (1986),<br />

Rethinking Positive Action,<br />

Industrial Labour Journal,<br />

p.219.<br />

38_Chaney, P & T. Rees<br />

(2004), The Northern<br />

Ireland Section 75 Duty:<br />

An International<br />

Perspective. Paper<br />

presented <strong>to</strong> the<br />

Section 75 Equality Duty<br />

– An Operational Review<br />

Conference, Belfast.<br />

39_www.cre.gov.uk/duty/<br />

pa_specific_schemes.html<br />

Overview of the role of positive duties<br />

There has been an understanding for some time that in order <strong>to</strong> address inequality, proactive steps may be<br />

needed; this has sometimes been described as ‘positive action’.<br />

At an international level, this concept was embedded in 1969 by the UN International Convention on the<br />

Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD):<br />

“ Special measures taken for the sole purpose of securing adequate advancement<br />

of certain racial or <strong>ethnic</strong> groups or individuals requiring such protection as may be<br />

necessary in order <strong>to</strong> ensure such groups or individuals equal enjoyment or exercise of<br />

human rights and fundamental freedoms shall not be deemed racial discrimination...” 34<br />

Although as is clear from this Article, ‘special measures’ were not necessarily being advocated, rather they<br />

were being protected and differentiated from racial discrimination itself.<br />

At a European level, the EU Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29th June 2000 implementing the principle<br />

of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or <strong>ethnic</strong> origin also allows Member States <strong>to</strong> take<br />

‘positive action’ <strong>to</strong> compensate disadvantages suffered by a particular racial or <strong>ethnic</strong> group. Again, taking<br />

positive action is not required but rather allowed.<br />

However, the notion of ‘positive duties’ which are required of public authorities has been developing. For<br />

example, in relation <strong>to</strong> human rights, the European Convention on Human Rights requires that the Convention<br />

rights be “secured <strong>to</strong> everyone” 35 and the doctrine of ‘positive obligations’ is being developed by the Strasbourg<br />

Court and, increasingly, by UK courts. Therefore, public authorities are required as a matter of law <strong>to</strong> adopt a<br />

proactive rather than a reactive approach. 36<br />

The concept of ‘positive duties’ is related <strong>to</strong> and yet distinct from the traditional concept of ‘positive action’.<br />

Various categories of positive action have been identified, one of which is ‘positive measures’ <strong>to</strong> eliminate<br />

discrimination, which means identifying and replacing discrimina<strong>to</strong>ry practices. 37 This approach does not<br />

necessarily involve ‘special treatment’ for disadvantaged groups, but understands his<strong>to</strong>rical disadvantage and<br />

exclusion; and therefore is not unlike the ‘positive duties’ concept described below.<br />

One of the first positive statu<strong>to</strong>ry duties, and perhaps the only one <strong>to</strong> be embedded in constitutional law,<br />

relates <strong>to</strong> public authorities in Northern Ireland and arises from Section 75 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998.<br />

Section 75 imposes a duty on specified public authorities <strong>to</strong> “have due regard <strong>to</strong> the need <strong>to</strong> promote equality<br />

of opportunity” across the nine equality strands and “<strong>to</strong> the desirability of promoting good relations between<br />

persons of different religious belief, political opinion or racial group”. It has been said that the Northern Ireland<br />

equality duty is “unique and pioneering” in mainstreaming equality and that in the future:<br />

“ …the unified yet multi-faceted approach <strong>to</strong> mainstreaming equality that is underpinned<br />

by S.75 will prove <strong>to</strong> have greater effectiveness than many contemporary approaches<br />

operating around the globe”. 38<br />

The UK introduced a ‘positive duty’ for public authorities in 2001 in an amendment <strong>to</strong> the Race Relations Act.<br />

The specific duties introduced by the Race Relations Act came in<strong>to</strong> full effect in Scotland on 30 November<br />

2002. The Race Relations Act 1976 (Statu<strong>to</strong>ry Duties) Order 2001 set out the specific duty for public<br />

authorities <strong>to</strong> prepare and publish race equality schemes. 39 The duties on public authorities are <strong>to</strong> eliminate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!