improving government service delivery to minority ethnic ... - NCCRI
improving government service delivery to minority ethnic ... - NCCRI
improving government service delivery to minority ethnic ... - NCCRI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>improving</strong><br />
<strong>government</strong><br />
<strong>service</strong><br />
<strong>delivery</strong><br />
<strong>to</strong> <strong>minority</strong><br />
<strong>ethnic</strong> groups<br />
Chapter 1: Context 28_29<br />
34_Article 1(4).<br />
35_Article 1.<br />
36_Butler, F. (2005),<br />
Improving Public Services:<br />
Using a Human Rights<br />
Approach, Institute for<br />
Public Policy Research.<br />
37_McCrudden, C. (1986),<br />
Rethinking Positive Action,<br />
Industrial Labour Journal,<br />
p.219.<br />
38_Chaney, P & T. Rees<br />
(2004), The Northern<br />
Ireland Section 75 Duty:<br />
An International<br />
Perspective. Paper<br />
presented <strong>to</strong> the<br />
Section 75 Equality Duty<br />
– An Operational Review<br />
Conference, Belfast.<br />
39_www.cre.gov.uk/duty/<br />
pa_specific_schemes.html<br />
Overview of the role of positive duties<br />
There has been an understanding for some time that in order <strong>to</strong> address inequality, proactive steps may be<br />
needed; this has sometimes been described as ‘positive action’.<br />
At an international level, this concept was embedded in 1969 by the UN International Convention on the<br />
Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD):<br />
“ Special measures taken for the sole purpose of securing adequate advancement<br />
of certain racial or <strong>ethnic</strong> groups or individuals requiring such protection as may be<br />
necessary in order <strong>to</strong> ensure such groups or individuals equal enjoyment or exercise of<br />
human rights and fundamental freedoms shall not be deemed racial discrimination...” 34<br />
Although as is clear from this Article, ‘special measures’ were not necessarily being advocated, rather they<br />
were being protected and differentiated from racial discrimination itself.<br />
At a European level, the EU Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29th June 2000 implementing the principle<br />
of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or <strong>ethnic</strong> origin also allows Member States <strong>to</strong> take<br />
‘positive action’ <strong>to</strong> compensate disadvantages suffered by a particular racial or <strong>ethnic</strong> group. Again, taking<br />
positive action is not required but rather allowed.<br />
However, the notion of ‘positive duties’ which are required of public authorities has been developing. For<br />
example, in relation <strong>to</strong> human rights, the European Convention on Human Rights requires that the Convention<br />
rights be “secured <strong>to</strong> everyone” 35 and the doctrine of ‘positive obligations’ is being developed by the Strasbourg<br />
Court and, increasingly, by UK courts. Therefore, public authorities are required as a matter of law <strong>to</strong> adopt a<br />
proactive rather than a reactive approach. 36<br />
The concept of ‘positive duties’ is related <strong>to</strong> and yet distinct from the traditional concept of ‘positive action’.<br />
Various categories of positive action have been identified, one of which is ‘positive measures’ <strong>to</strong> eliminate<br />
discrimination, which means identifying and replacing discrimina<strong>to</strong>ry practices. 37 This approach does not<br />
necessarily involve ‘special treatment’ for disadvantaged groups, but understands his<strong>to</strong>rical disadvantage and<br />
exclusion; and therefore is not unlike the ‘positive duties’ concept described below.<br />
One of the first positive statu<strong>to</strong>ry duties, and perhaps the only one <strong>to</strong> be embedded in constitutional law,<br />
relates <strong>to</strong> public authorities in Northern Ireland and arises from Section 75 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998.<br />
Section 75 imposes a duty on specified public authorities <strong>to</strong> “have due regard <strong>to</strong> the need <strong>to</strong> promote equality<br />
of opportunity” across the nine equality strands and “<strong>to</strong> the desirability of promoting good relations between<br />
persons of different religious belief, political opinion or racial group”. It has been said that the Northern Ireland<br />
equality duty is “unique and pioneering” in mainstreaming equality and that in the future:<br />
“ …the unified yet multi-faceted approach <strong>to</strong> mainstreaming equality that is underpinned<br />
by S.75 will prove <strong>to</strong> have greater effectiveness than many contemporary approaches<br />
operating around the globe”. 38<br />
The UK introduced a ‘positive duty’ for public authorities in 2001 in an amendment <strong>to</strong> the Race Relations Act.<br />
The specific duties introduced by the Race Relations Act came in<strong>to</strong> full effect in Scotland on 30 November<br />
2002. The Race Relations Act 1976 (Statu<strong>to</strong>ry Duties) Order 2001 set out the specific duty for public<br />
authorities <strong>to</strong> prepare and publish race equality schemes. 39 The duties on public authorities are <strong>to</strong> eliminate