improving government service delivery to minority ethnic ... - NCCRI
improving government service delivery to minority ethnic ... - NCCRI
improving government service delivery to minority ethnic ... - NCCRI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>improving</strong><br />
<strong>government</strong><br />
<strong>service</strong><br />
<strong>delivery</strong><br />
<strong>to</strong> <strong>minority</strong><br />
<strong>ethnic</strong> groups<br />
Chapter 3: Scotland Research Findings 86_87<br />
161_Race Equality<br />
Regulations 2003.<br />
162_CRE (2005)<br />
Submission <strong>to</strong> Scottish<br />
Executive’s Review of Race<br />
Equality work.<br />
The requirements of the anti-discrimination legislation in relation <strong>to</strong> race<br />
The requirements of the Race Relations Act (1976) and the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000 have<br />
been discussed above. The other major piece of legislation is the Race Relations Act (1976) (Amendment)<br />
Regulations 2003. The Regulations are a result of the EU Race Directive which stems from Article 13 of the<br />
Treaty of Amsterdam (1997) and they offer protection from discrimination in the areas of employment, training,<br />
education, access <strong>to</strong> social security and health care and access <strong>to</strong> goods and <strong>service</strong>s including health care.<br />
The new regulations strengthen some aspects of the 1976 Act including:<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
introducing a new concept of indirect discrimination which is more likely <strong>to</strong> catch “informal” discrimina<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
practices as well as “formal” practices;<br />
introducing an explicit definition of harassment (as opposed <strong>to</strong> previously having <strong>to</strong> show that the<br />
harassment amounted <strong>to</strong> discrimination);<br />
changing the emphasis in relation <strong>to</strong> burden of proof so that when claimants establish a prima facie case of<br />
racial discrimination or harassment on the relevant grounds, the tribunal or court will up hold the complaint<br />
in the absence of a satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry explanation; and<br />
introducing the concept of genuine occupational requirement which allows the setting in which job takes<br />
place <strong>to</strong> be taken in<strong>to</strong> account in deciding whether or not a job should be restricted <strong>to</strong> a racial group. 161<br />
Promoting diversity within <strong>service</strong> provision<br />
The Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) is a GB wide body established by the 1976 Race Relations Act. It is<br />
an independent body funded by the Home Office and has three main aims:<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
To work <strong>to</strong>wards the elimination of racial discrimination and promote equality of opportunity;<br />
To encourage good relations between people from different racial and <strong>ethnic</strong> backgrounds; and<br />
To moni<strong>to</strong>r the way the Race Relations Act is working and recommend ways in which it can be improved.<br />
Although it is not an inspec<strong>to</strong>rate, it can investigate and take legal action, in some circumstances, against<br />
companies and organisations if they are in breach of the RRA.<br />
In Scotland its work is carried out by CRE Scotland which has an Advisory Board and there is a Commissioner<br />
for Scotland. The CRE Scotland’s submission <strong>to</strong> the Scottish Executive as part of the Executive’s Review of<br />
Race Equality 162 argued that progress on race equality was slower than was desirable and that the progress<br />
was patchy. It was argued that in some departments, although there was some progress on action plans, the<br />
plans did not necessarily meet all elements of the duty. In particular they noted that the Executive has been<br />
slow <strong>to</strong> progress issues of moni<strong>to</strong>ring <strong>service</strong> provision which is crucial <strong>to</strong> the successful roll out of the Duty.<br />
The CRE also argued that:<br />
“ A key barrier <strong>to</strong> the full implementation of the Duty is a lack of an effective<br />
complementary <strong>delivery</strong> mechanism on the ground. Indeed, there is currently an<br />
absence of national strategy – based on clear and consistent outcomes- in relation <strong>to</strong><br />
the funding and <strong>delivery</strong> of race equality work in Scotland.”<br />
It is hoped that the measures <strong>to</strong> be introduced as a result of the review of the Race Equality in Scotland will go<br />
some way <strong>to</strong> addressing those criticisms.