climate change on UAE - Stockholm Environment Institute-US Center
climate change on UAE - Stockholm Environment Institute-US Center
climate change on UAE - Stockholm Environment Institute-US Center
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
also assumes that c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> programs are<br />
mostly unsuccessful in reducing per-capita<br />
demand. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>climate</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>change</str<strong>on</strong>g> assumpti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
include a nearly 2.7ºC warming by 2050 relative<br />
to the historic baseline, with the ADE becoming<br />
even more arid due to a 20% decline in annual<br />
average precipitati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Scenario 2.1 assumes the same adaptati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
as Scenario 1.1 (reducti<strong>on</strong>s in amenity and<br />
agricultural water use), but differs from the<br />
optimistic baseline Scenario implying greater<br />
reducti<strong>on</strong>s in domestic water use. Scenario<br />
2.2 tiers off Scenario 2.1 but without <str<strong>on</strong>g>climate</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>change</str<strong>on</strong>g> to illustrate the relative impact of<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>climate</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> demand.<br />
4.8.3. The Middle of the Road<br />
Scenarios (3)<br />
The Middle-of-the-Road (MOR) Scenario (3)<br />
assumes that populati<strong>on</strong> growth is high, but<br />
c<strong>on</strong>siderable measures are taken to reduce<br />
the recent high populati<strong>on</strong> growth, as rates<br />
quickly fall from 8% then 6% per annum, with<br />
a final rate of 4% through 2050. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>climate</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>change</str<strong>on</strong>g> assumpti<strong>on</strong>s for the MOR Scenario<br />
include a 2.2ºC warming through 2050 and a<br />
5% increase in annual precipitati<strong>on</strong> relative to<br />
the 1961-90 baseline. Scenario 3.1 tiers off of<br />
Scenario 3, but assumes no warming in order to<br />
assess the relative impact of <str<strong>on</strong>g>climate</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>change</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong><br />
water demand (see further explanati<strong>on</strong> in the<br />
Reference Scenario).<br />
4.8.4. The Reference Scenario (3.1)<br />
To dem<strong>on</strong>strate the marginal impact that<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>climate</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>change</str<strong>on</strong>g> has <strong>on</strong> water supply and demand<br />
relative to the other drivers of populati<strong>on</strong><br />
growth, per-capita demand, and water use by<br />
the amenity, forestry, and agriculture sectors,<br />
Scenario 3.1 tiers off the MOR Scenario but<br />
assumes no future <str<strong>on</strong>g>climate</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>change</str<strong>on</strong>g>. This final<br />
Scenario was also run, assuming no <str<strong>on</strong>g>change</str<strong>on</strong>g> in<br />
per-capita demand, no reducti<strong>on</strong>s in sectoral<br />
use, a c<strong>on</strong>tinued populati<strong>on</strong> growth rate of 8%,<br />
and no <str<strong>on</strong>g>climate</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>change</str<strong>on</strong>g>. With no assumpti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
about future c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>sidered and current<br />
patterns of use and populati<strong>on</strong> growth assumed,<br />
this was referred to as the ‘reference’ Scenario<br />
and suggests an extreme future total water<br />
demand c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
116<br />
Climate Change Impacts, Vulnerability & Adaptati<strong>on</strong>