aceUVi

Recommendations

Info

Urrutiaguer, Daniel. 2002. ‘Quality Judgments and Demand for French Public Theatre’. Journal of Cultural Economics 22. 185-202. Villaseñor Alonso, Isabel. 2011. ‘El valor intrínseco del patrimonio cultural: ¿una noción aún vigente’ Intervención 2:3. 6-13. Vincs, Kim. ‘Structure and Aesthetics in Audience Responses to Dance’. In The Audience Experience: A critical analysis of audiences in the performing arts, edited by Jennifer Radbourne, Hilary Glow, and Katya Johanson. Bristol, UK and Chicago, USA: Intellect. 129-142. Vuyk, Kees. 2010. ‘The arts as an instrument Notes on the controversy surrounding the value of art’. International Journal of Cultural Policy 16: 2. 173-183. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10286630903029641 Wali, Alaka, and Joshua Ostergaard. 2010. ‘Toward a More Inclusive Approach to Participation: The Varieties of Art Experiences’. Audiences and the Arts: Communication Perspectives, edited by L Foreman- Wernet & B Dervin. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. 43-60. Walmsley, Ben. 2013. ‘“A big part of my life”: a qualitative study of the impact of theatre.’ Arts Marketing: An International Journal 3:1. 73 – 87. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htmarticleid=17088443&show=abstract Walmsley, Ben. 2012. ‘Whose value is it anyway A neo-institutionalist approach to articulating and evaluating artistic value’. Journal of Arts & Communities 4:3. 199-215. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/intellect/jaac/2012/00000004/00000003/art00005 Wavell, Caroline, Graeme Baxter, Ian Johnson, Dorothy Williams. 2002. Impact Evaluation of Museums, Archives and Libraries: Available Evidence Project. http://www4.rgu.ac.uk/files/imreport.pdf Wesner, Simone. 2010. ‘Cultural fingerprints – the legacy of cultural values in the current cultural policy agenda in Germany’. International Journal of Cultural Policy 16:4. 433-448. White, Tabitha R, and Anne-Marie Hede. 2008. ‘Using narrative inquiry to explore the impact of art on individuals’. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 38:1. 19-36. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3200/JAML.38.1.19-36 Wilkinson, Helen. 2008. ‘Conceptualizing impact: museums, government and value – irreconcilable differences’ Cultural Trends 17:6. 335-339. Bibliography 146 UNDERSTANDING the value and impacts of cultural experiences
Williams, Tandi. 2011. Community Relevance: literature review. Australia Council for the Arts. Williams, Tandi, and Bridget Jones. 2011. Understanding Community Relevance: A Discussion Paper. Australia Council for the Arts. Winn, Bradley A, and Kim S Cameron. 1998. ‘Organizational Quality: An Examination of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Framework’. Research in Higher Education 39:5. 491-512. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1018745505108 Wolf, Dennie Palmer, and Katy Denson. 2009. ‘Nurturing Creative Capital: Successful Children, Strong Families and Vibrant Neighborhoods’. Big Thought, Dallas, Texas. http://www.creatingquality.org/ToolsResourcesLibrary/ResourceDetail/tabid/93/ArticleId/90/ Nurturing-Creative-Capital-Successful-Children-Strong-Families-and-Vibrant-Neighborhoods.aspx WolfBrown. 2012. Audience Impact Study: Literature Review. National Endowment for the Arts. http://arts.gov/sites/default/files/Audience-Impact-Study-Literature-Review.pdf OTHER LITERATURE In the course of our research we identified some literature that we were unable to obtain or review in the time that was allotted for this project. Further, some of the literature we reviewed was only tangentially related to the present inquiry although it may be relevant to researchers who are interested in specific topics related to the impacts and value of cultural experiences. We list this literature here for the benefit of future researchers. Bakari, Imruh. 2012. Culture and Creative Industries in Tanzania: A Plan for Strategic Action. UNESCO Tanzania. http://www.unescodar.or.tz/unescodar/publications/Culture%20and%20Creative%20Industries%20 in%20Tanzania.pdf Balling, Gitte, and Nanna Kann-Christensen. 2013. ‘What is a non-user An analysis of Danish surveys on cultural habits and participation’. Cultural Trends 22:2. 67-76. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09548963.2013.783159 Barbieri, Nicolás, Adriana Partal, and Eva Merino. 2011. ‘Nuevas políticas, nuevas miradas y metodologías de evaluación. ¿Cómo evaluar el retorno social de las políticas culturales’(New Policies, New Perspectives, and Methodologies of Evaluation: How to Evaluate the Social Return of Cultural Policies). Papers. Revista de Sociologia 96:2. 477-500. Bibliography 147 UNDERSTANDING the value and impacts of cultural experiences
Page 1 and 2:
UNDERSTANDING the VALUE and IMPACTS
Page 3 and 4:
However, we cannot ignore this ‘i
Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 FOREWORD 4 ACKN
Page 7 and 8:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Over the past dec
Page 9 and 10:
dividing the overall value into con
Page 11 and 12:
the necessity of limiting the scope
Page 13 and 14:
espondents are conscious; 2) there
Page 15 and 16:
Table 2 Stages of Individual Impact
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 6 Impact pattern of a cultur
Page 19 and 20:
Valuing arts and culture from the m
Page 21 and 22:
cultural researchers are hamstrung
Page 23 and 24:
organisation’s creative capacity
Page 25 and 26:
The literature clearly identifies t
Page 27 and 28:
1 INTRODUCTION This literature revi
Page 29 and 30:
Outline of the report This literatu
Page 31 and 32:
Economic value There are several di
Page 33 and 34:
happy, healthy, educated people pro
Page 35 and 36:
2 FRAMING THE CONVERSATION LANGUAGE
Page 37 and 38:
six in particular. Indeed, the fact
Page 39 and 40:
Arjo Klamer Within the field of Cul
Page 41 and 42:
culture. By increasing people’s k
Page 43 and 44:
that Holden mentions under the head
Page 45 and 46:
public value’ (4). The authors de
Page 47 and 48:
Figure 3 Tentative visual synthesis
Page 49 and 50:
establish an interpretive frame and
Page 51 and 52:
terpretive, curatorial, observation
Page 53 and 54:
Knell and Taylor Due to the widespr
Page 55 and 56:
of impacts with instrumental values
Page 57 and 58:
the capacities to realise cultural
Page 59 and 60:
3 MEASURING INDIVIDUAL IMPACT As wa
Page 61 and 62:
While one might argue that the requ
Page 63 and 64:
Table 1 Comparison of components of
Page 65 and 66:
In Brown and Novak-Leonard (2007),
Page 67 and 68:
Novak-Leonard’s terms) stands out
Page 69 and 70:
Like Brown and Novak-Leonard and NE
Page 71 and 72:
Table A-2: A grouping of indicators
Page 73 and 74:
The same two studies also provide a
Page 75 and 76:
Summary The fact that different res
Page 77 and 78:
with audience members, and they all
Page 79 and 80:
are applied in the evaluation of te
Page 81 and 82:
White and Hede Tabitha White and An
Page 83 and 84:
(2008) and Foreman-Wernet and Dervi
Page 85 and 86:
Everett and Barrett Michelle Everet
Page 87 and 88:
‘sensation’, while Walmsley use
Page 89 and 90:
Discussion of research methodologie
Page 91 and 92:
analyse existing interviews from so
Page 93 and 94:
Individual impacts are not fixed or
Page 95 and 96: 4 VALUING ARTS AND CULTURE FROM THE
Page 97 and 98: In reviewing types of goals, motiva
Page 99 and 100: Intrinsic • Self-oriented, active
Page 101 and 102: of audience members’ overall eval
Page 103 and 104: this factor leads the researchers t
Page 105 and 106: 5 CREATIVE CAPACITY OF AN ORGANISAT
Page 107 and 108: Sabine Boerner Sabine Boerner (2004
Page 109 and 110: Daniel Urrutiaguer Daniel Urrutiagu
Page 111 and 112: Hannah, Langsted and Larsen 1 Boern
Page 113 and 114: In entrusting the evaluation to exp
Page 115 and 116: of the major performing arts organi
Page 117 and 118: Clarity of intent and commitment to
Page 119 and 120: tional structure in determining art
Page 121 and 122: Supportive Networks (conditional el
Page 123 and 124: CODA: COMBINING MEASURES OF EXPERIE
Page 125 and 126: dimensions in the shaded boxes have
Page 127 and 128: The 2012 DCA report assures readers
Page 129 and 130: Bailey, Jackie 2009a. Defining arti
Page 131 and 132: Margaret Bolton and Clare Cooper. 2
Page 133 and 134: Chappell, Michael, and John Knell.
Page 135 and 136: Falk, John H and Lynn D Dierking. 2
Page 137 and 138: Johanson, Kaya. 2013. ‘Listening
Page 139 and 140: Marsh, Kevin, and Evelina Bertranou
Page 141 and 142: New Economics Foundation. 2008. Cap
Page 143 and 144: Reason, Matthew. 2004. ‘Theatre a
Page 145: Throsby, David. 2010. The Economics
Page 149 and 150: Hegarty, C Boyd. 2009. ‘The value
Page 151 and 152: APPENDIX TABLES Table A-1 A groupin
Page 153 and 154: Table A-3 A grouping of indicators
Page 155 and 156: Table A-5 A grouping of indicators
show all

aceUVi

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?