06.01.2015 Views

aceUVi

aceUVi

aceUVi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This section covers four research approaches:<br />

1. physiological and psychometric research<br />

2. post-event surveying<br />

3. qualitative post-event research<br />

4. retrospective identification of impactful events – and concludes with a<br />

synthesis of the various research methods.<br />

Physiological and psychometric responses<br />

measured during the experience<br />

There is a growing body of research that investigates the biological functions that<br />

underlie the aesthetic experience. Within this field (sometimes referred to as ‘bioaesthetics’)<br />

a significant amount of research examines neurological responses to<br />

aesthetic stimuli. Due to the technological requirements involved, it is currently<br />

not feasible to measure the brain activity of large numbers of people at once,<br />

although a number of studies have sought to capture other forms of biometric<br />

data as a means of gauging audience responses to art, some of which may be<br />

useful in informing the discussion of value and impact.<br />

Latulipe, Carroll and Lottridge<br />

For instance, Celine Latulipe, Erin A. Carroll and<br />

Danielle Lottridge (2011) measure galvanic skin<br />

responses (conductance) during performing arts<br />

experiences and correlate them with the level of<br />

engagement that test subjects report during the<br />

performance. While such measurement techniques<br />

may not be of immediate practical value as means<br />

of gauging audience responses on a routine basis at<br />

C Latulipe, E A Carroll and D Lottridge,<br />

2011, ‘Love, hate, arousal and engagement:<br />

exploring audience responses to performing<br />

arts’, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference<br />

on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1845-<br />

1854.<br />

theatres and concert halls, the study raises important questions that may inform<br />

refinements in the theory of impact and value creation. During pilot tests of the<br />

rating systems, for instance, the researchers found that<br />

… simply labeling the slider with No Engagement and High Engagement was<br />

confusing. Participants could not detach valence from the word, and tended to<br />

only rate themselves as being engaged when they liked what they saw. Others<br />

just didn’t really seem to know what we meant by engagement, and still others<br />

didn’t seem to know how engaged they were. (1850)<br />

Measuring Individual Impact: Physiological and psychometric responses measured during the experience 60<br />

UNDERSTANDING the value and impacts of cultural experiences

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!