06.01.2015 Views

aceUVi

aceUVi

aceUVi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

cultural experience or whether the experience only becomes a cultural experience<br />

once cognition, meaning and emotion set in.<br />

While biometric measures of impact are not a focus of this review, they represent<br />

an important frontier in measurement. Moreover, any conceptual framework for<br />

impact that ignores the immediate physiological effects of cultural experiences –<br />

regardless of the difficulties in measurement – would be incomplete.<br />

Post-event surveying<br />

The literature that is more centrally engaged with concepts of individual impact<br />

generally draws its data from subjective, retrospective reporting from participants,<br />

attendees and audience members. Within this literature methodological differences<br />

remain in the manner in which the data is collected, when it is collected and<br />

whether the participants are questioned about specific events or about cultural<br />

experiences in general.<br />

Over the past 15 years, researchers have increasingly turned to post-event surveys<br />

to ask respondents to report on various aspects of their cultural experiences.<br />

Some of these surveys are strictly quantitative, while others incorporate both<br />

quantitative measures and open-ended questions in order to gain a more complex<br />

understanding of the internal responses that artistic experiences provoke in<br />

viewers. While the approach is similar to consumer satisfaction surveys that are<br />

used in market research, these studies try to gain a broad understanding of the<br />

multiple facets of the experience rather than generating simplistic measures of<br />

loyalty or satisfaction.<br />

Several of these studies offer conceptual frameworks for individual impacts, subdividing<br />

the various impacts into categories or ‘constructs’, often based on the<br />

authors’ own literature reviews, while others have developed indicators of impact<br />

in pursuit of a particular research hypothesis, or consulted with artists and administrators<br />

in developing an original framework for impact or quality. Table 1,<br />

below, roughly illustrates how the constructs of individual impacts align across<br />

several of the key quantitative studies reviewed for this paper, and begins to<br />

suggest some of the definitional disparities across studies.<br />

Measuring Individual Impact: Physiological and psychometric responses measured during the experience 62<br />

UNDERSTANDING the value and impacts of cultural experiences

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!