06.01.2015 Views

aceUVi

aceUVi

aceUVi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 VALUING ARTS AND CULTURE<br />

FROM THE MARKETING<br />

PERSPECTIVE<br />

Most of the literature that has been discussed so far may be<br />

considered a cohesive body of literature in the sense that the<br />

works reference each other or reference common antecedents.<br />

The marketing field has produced another body of research on<br />

valuing arts and cultural experiences, although this research is<br />

largely ignored in the literature previously reviewed. These two<br />

bodies of literature seem to exist largely independently of each<br />

other, with very little dialogue between the two 1 . While we are<br />

unable to provide a comprehensive summary of the marketing<br />

literature here, this section highlights some areas in which the<br />

two bodies of literature intersect as well as some fundamental<br />

differences that distinguish the marketing perspective from<br />

the other studies reviewed here. The marketing perspective is<br />

particularly relevant to the present inquiry given our focus on<br />

the individual’s experience of culture (whether as spectator<br />

or participant), which aligns with the emphasis on individual<br />

consumers in the general marketing model.<br />

There are several possible explanations of why the marketing literature has<br />

largely been excluded from wider discussions of the impacts and value in the<br />

arts and cultural sector. Perhaps most obviously, researchers in the marketing<br />

field generally focus on the production of economic value, specifically, the components<br />

of economic value that are expressed in the marketplace through price<br />

and demand. While marketing researchers examine consumer value, motivations<br />

and customer satisfaction, which are related to constructs of impact and value<br />

discussed elsewhere in the literature, they do so with the objective of explaining<br />

consumer behaviour (eg, repeat purchases), rather than to contribute to a broader<br />

understanding of the value and impacts of cultural experiences (Bouder-Pailler<br />

1 There are, of course, a few exceptions. For example, Radbourne et al and Walmsley<br />

tie marketing research into discussions of policy and evaluation.<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!