aceUVi
aceUVi
aceUVi
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4 VALUING ARTS AND CULTURE<br />
FROM THE MARKETING<br />
PERSPECTIVE<br />
Most of the literature that has been discussed so far may be<br />
considered a cohesive body of literature in the sense that the<br />
works reference each other or reference common antecedents.<br />
The marketing field has produced another body of research on<br />
valuing arts and cultural experiences, although this research is<br />
largely ignored in the literature previously reviewed. These two<br />
bodies of literature seem to exist largely independently of each<br />
other, with very little dialogue between the two 1 . While we are<br />
unable to provide a comprehensive summary of the marketing<br />
literature here, this section highlights some areas in which the<br />
two bodies of literature intersect as well as some fundamental<br />
differences that distinguish the marketing perspective from<br />
the other studies reviewed here. The marketing perspective is<br />
particularly relevant to the present inquiry given our focus on<br />
the individual’s experience of culture (whether as spectator<br />
or participant), which aligns with the emphasis on individual<br />
consumers in the general marketing model.<br />
There are several possible explanations of why the marketing literature has<br />
largely been excluded from wider discussions of the impacts and value in the<br />
arts and cultural sector. Perhaps most obviously, researchers in the marketing<br />
field generally focus on the production of economic value, specifically, the components<br />
of economic value that are expressed in the marketplace through price<br />
and demand. While marketing researchers examine consumer value, motivations<br />
and customer satisfaction, which are related to constructs of impact and value<br />
discussed elsewhere in the literature, they do so with the objective of explaining<br />
consumer behaviour (eg, repeat purchases), rather than to contribute to a broader<br />
understanding of the value and impacts of cultural experiences (Bouder-Pailler<br />
1 There are, of course, a few exceptions. For example, Radbourne et al and Walmsley<br />
tie marketing research into discussions of policy and evaluation.<br />
95