aceUVi
aceUVi
aceUVi
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Like Foreman-Wernet and Dervin (2011), White and Hede find that their informants<br />
cite a wide range of experiences with popular culture along with their<br />
impressions of the fine arts (28). Moreover, participants describe interacting with<br />
art in a wide variety of spaces (eg, in the street, at home, in commercial venues, in<br />
church) and in several different modes. The modes of participation mentioned by<br />
the informants correspond with those identified by Brown (2004).<br />
White and Hede conclude that the impact of art is a complex phenomenon that<br />
depends on ‘each individual’s experience and perspective’ (32). Their research<br />
approach shares many of the same strengths and weaknesses of SMM.<br />
Ben Walmsley<br />
Ben Walmsley considers White and Hede’s interpretation<br />
to be a great step forward. In particular,<br />
he commends that they identify ‘enablers’ and<br />
depict the impacts as part of an integrated whole<br />
rather than separating social and personal benefits<br />
into discrete clusters (77). This stands in contrast to<br />
Ben Walmsley, 2013, ‘“A big part of my life”: a<br />
qualitative study of the impact of theatre’, in<br />
Arts Marketing: An International Journal 3:1,<br />
73-87.<br />
two-dimensional ‘benefits models’ which he critiques for reducing ‘the complex<br />
realm of value to tangible benefits and outputs, [thereby failing] to fully represent<br />
theatre experiences as situational and relational’ (78). Echoing the calls of other<br />
proponents of qualitative research, he advocates for an approach that assesses<br />
‘impact on its own terms and in the audience’s own vernacular’ (78).<br />
Walmsley’s 2013 paper focuses on theatre and explores the impact that it has on<br />
audiences, ‘both immediately and over time’ (74). He is principally concerned<br />
with the audience’s perspective and capturing ‘the personal and intrinsic aspects<br />
of impact as articulated by theatre-goers themselves’ (74). To do this, he conducts<br />
a series of 34 semi-structured interviews with patrons of two theatre companies,<br />
one in Melbourne, Australia and the other in Leeds, UK. In addition, he interviews<br />
a total of eight staff members at the two theatre companies. Rather than<br />
soliciting responses to a particular production, Walmsley follows White and Hede<br />
Measuring Individual Impact: Qualitative Research 82<br />
UNDERSTANDING the value and impacts of cultural experiences