06.01.2015 Views

aceUVi

aceUVi

aceUVi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Like Foreman-Wernet and Dervin (2011), White and Hede find that their informants<br />

cite a wide range of experiences with popular culture along with their<br />

impressions of the fine arts (28). Moreover, participants describe interacting with<br />

art in a wide variety of spaces (eg, in the street, at home, in commercial venues, in<br />

church) and in several different modes. The modes of participation mentioned by<br />

the informants correspond with those identified by Brown (2004).<br />

White and Hede conclude that the impact of art is a complex phenomenon that<br />

depends on ‘each individual’s experience and perspective’ (32). Their research<br />

approach shares many of the same strengths and weaknesses of SMM.<br />

Ben Walmsley<br />

Ben Walmsley considers White and Hede’s interpretation<br />

to be a great step forward. In particular,<br />

he commends that they identify ‘enablers’ and<br />

depict the impacts as part of an integrated whole<br />

rather than separating social and personal benefits<br />

into discrete clusters (77). This stands in contrast to<br />

Ben Walmsley, 2013, ‘“A big part of my life”: a<br />

qualitative study of the impact of theatre’, in<br />

Arts Marketing: An International Journal 3:1,<br />

73-87.<br />

two-dimensional ‘benefits models’ which he critiques for reducing ‘the complex<br />

realm of value to tangible benefits and outputs, [thereby failing] to fully represent<br />

theatre experiences as situational and relational’ (78). Echoing the calls of other<br />

proponents of qualitative research, he advocates for an approach that assesses<br />

‘impact on its own terms and in the audience’s own vernacular’ (78).<br />

Walmsley’s 2013 paper focuses on theatre and explores the impact that it has on<br />

audiences, ‘both immediately and over time’ (74). He is principally concerned<br />

with the audience’s perspective and capturing ‘the personal and intrinsic aspects<br />

of impact as articulated by theatre-goers themselves’ (74). To do this, he conducts<br />

a series of 34 semi-structured interviews with patrons of two theatre companies,<br />

one in Melbourne, Australia and the other in Leeds, UK. In addition, he interviews<br />

a total of eight staff members at the two theatre companies. Rather than<br />

soliciting responses to a particular production, Walmsley follows White and Hede<br />

Measuring Individual Impact: Qualitative Research 82<br />

UNDERSTANDING the value and impacts of cultural experiences

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!