06.01.2015 Views

aceUVi

aceUVi

aceUVi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

David Throsby<br />

The field that has dedicated itself most overtly to<br />

the exploration of value in the context of arts and<br />

culture is that of Cultural Economics. While the<br />

roots of the discipline are, as David Throsby notes,<br />

‘firmly planted in economics’, many of its contributors<br />

position themselves outside of mainstream<br />

neoclassical economics (2001, 12).<br />

David Throsby, 2001, Economics and Culture,<br />

Cambridge University Press.<br />

David Throsby, 2010, The Economics of<br />

Cultural Policy, Cambridge University Press.<br />

Throsby, for instance, maintains that ‘neoclassical<br />

economics is ... ultimately limited in its explanatory<br />

power’ (2001, 2). He states,<br />

To a neoclassical economist, a full assessment of the market and/or non-market<br />

value of any good or service, including cultural goods, would be provided by<br />

measuring actual payment and/or potential willingness to pay. (2010, 20)<br />

However, he points out that the modern theory of marginal utility determining<br />

value has been criticised for not taking into account that value is socially<br />

constructed (2001, 22) and lists several reasons why cultural value may be inadequately<br />

captured by measures of willingness to pay (2001, 32). Contrary to<br />

neoclassical orthodoxy, Throsby therefore maintains ‘the necessity of regarding<br />

economic and cultural value as distinct entities... each one telling us something<br />

different of importance to an understanding of the commodity’s worth’ (2001, 33).<br />

In many cases cultural value is likely to be correlated with economic values, but<br />

not necessarily perfectly. In some cases the correlation may in fact be negative, as<br />

is the case when cultural works that are popular successes are deemed to be of low<br />

cultural value (2001, 34).<br />

Throsby disaggregates cultural value into several components in order to explain<br />

the concept ‘in such a way that its importance alongside economic value can be<br />

more vigorously asserted’ (2001, 31). His list of ‘some of [the] more important<br />

constituent elements’ of cultural value includes:<br />

• Aesthetic value<br />

• Spiritual value<br />

• Social value<br />

• Historical value<br />

• Symbolic value<br />

• Authenticity value<br />

In his influential 2001 book, Throsby does not claim that this list of components<br />

of cultural value is complete. There is no compelling theoretical or empirical<br />

reason why cultural value should consist of exactly six components, or why these<br />

Framing the Conversation 36<br />

UNDERSTANDING the value and impacts of cultural experiences

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!