aceUVi
aceUVi
aceUVi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
David Throsby<br />
The field that has dedicated itself most overtly to<br />
the exploration of value in the context of arts and<br />
culture is that of Cultural Economics. While the<br />
roots of the discipline are, as David Throsby notes,<br />
‘firmly planted in economics’, many of its contributors<br />
position themselves outside of mainstream<br />
neoclassical economics (2001, 12).<br />
David Throsby, 2001, Economics and Culture,<br />
Cambridge University Press.<br />
David Throsby, 2010, The Economics of<br />
Cultural Policy, Cambridge University Press.<br />
Throsby, for instance, maintains that ‘neoclassical<br />
economics is ... ultimately limited in its explanatory<br />
power’ (2001, 2). He states,<br />
To a neoclassical economist, a full assessment of the market and/or non-market<br />
value of any good or service, including cultural goods, would be provided by<br />
measuring actual payment and/or potential willingness to pay. (2010, 20)<br />
However, he points out that the modern theory of marginal utility determining<br />
value has been criticised for not taking into account that value is socially<br />
constructed (2001, 22) and lists several reasons why cultural value may be inadequately<br />
captured by measures of willingness to pay (2001, 32). Contrary to<br />
neoclassical orthodoxy, Throsby therefore maintains ‘the necessity of regarding<br />
economic and cultural value as distinct entities... each one telling us something<br />
different of importance to an understanding of the commodity’s worth’ (2001, 33).<br />
In many cases cultural value is likely to be correlated with economic values, but<br />
not necessarily perfectly. In some cases the correlation may in fact be negative, as<br />
is the case when cultural works that are popular successes are deemed to be of low<br />
cultural value (2001, 34).<br />
Throsby disaggregates cultural value into several components in order to explain<br />
the concept ‘in such a way that its importance alongside economic value can be<br />
more vigorously asserted’ (2001, 31). His list of ‘some of [the] more important<br />
constituent elements’ of cultural value includes:<br />
• Aesthetic value<br />
• Spiritual value<br />
• Social value<br />
• Historical value<br />
• Symbolic value<br />
• Authenticity value<br />
In his influential 2001 book, Throsby does not claim that this list of components<br />
of cultural value is complete. There is no compelling theoretical or empirical<br />
reason why cultural value should consist of exactly six components, or why these<br />
Framing the Conversation 36<br />
UNDERSTANDING the value and impacts of cultural experiences