- Page 1 and 2: UNDERSTANDING the VALUE and IMPACTS
- Page 3 and 4: However, we cannot ignore this ‘i
- Page 5: TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 FOREWORD 4 ACKN
- Page 9 and 10: dividing the overall value into con
- Page 11 and 12: the necessity of limiting the scope
- Page 13 and 14: espondents are conscious; 2) there
- Page 15 and 16: Table 2 Stages of Individual Impact
- Page 17 and 18: Figure 6 Impact pattern of a cultur
- Page 19 and 20: Valuing arts and culture from the m
- Page 21 and 22: cultural researchers are hamstrung
- Page 23 and 24: organisation’s creative capacity
- Page 25 and 26: The literature clearly identifies t
- Page 27 and 28: 1 INTRODUCTION This literature revi
- Page 29 and 30: Outline of the report This literatu
- Page 31 and 32: Economic value There are several di
- Page 33 and 34: happy, healthy, educated people pro
- Page 35 and 36: 2 FRAMING THE CONVERSATION LANGUAGE
- Page 37 and 38: six in particular. Indeed, the fact
- Page 39 and 40: Arjo Klamer Within the field of Cul
- Page 41 and 42: culture. By increasing people’s k
- Page 43 and 44: that Holden mentions under the head
- Page 45 and 46: public value’ (4). The authors de
- Page 47 and 48: Figure 3 Tentative visual synthesis
- Page 49 and 50: establish an interpretive frame and
- Page 51 and 52: terpretive, curatorial, observation
- Page 53 and 54: Knell and Taylor Due to the widespr
- Page 55 and 56: of impacts with instrumental values
- Page 57 and 58:
the capacities to realise cultural
- Page 59 and 60:
3 MEASURING INDIVIDUAL IMPACT As wa
- Page 61 and 62:
While one might argue that the requ
- Page 63 and 64:
Table 1 Comparison of components of
- Page 65 and 66:
In Brown and Novak-Leonard (2007),
- Page 67 and 68:
Novak-Leonard’s terms) stands out
- Page 69 and 70:
Like Brown and Novak-Leonard and NE
- Page 71 and 72:
Table A-2: A grouping of indicators
- Page 73 and 74:
The same two studies also provide a
- Page 75 and 76:
Summary The fact that different res
- Page 77 and 78:
with audience members, and they all
- Page 79 and 80:
are applied in the evaluation of te
- Page 81 and 82:
White and Hede Tabitha White and An
- Page 83 and 84:
(2008) and Foreman-Wernet and Dervi
- Page 85 and 86:
Everett and Barrett Michelle Everet
- Page 87 and 88:
‘sensation’, while Walmsley use
- Page 89 and 90:
Discussion of research methodologie
- Page 91 and 92:
analyse existing interviews from so
- Page 93 and 94:
Individual impacts are not fixed or
- Page 95 and 96:
4 VALUING ARTS AND CULTURE FROM THE
- Page 97 and 98:
In reviewing types of goals, motiva
- Page 99 and 100:
Intrinsic • Self-oriented, active
- Page 101 and 102:
of audience members’ overall eval
- Page 103 and 104:
this factor leads the researchers t
- Page 105 and 106:
5 CREATIVE CAPACITY OF AN ORGANISAT
- Page 107 and 108:
Sabine Boerner Sabine Boerner (2004
- Page 109 and 110:
Daniel Urrutiaguer Daniel Urrutiagu
- Page 111 and 112:
Hannah, Langsted and Larsen 1 Boern
- Page 113 and 114:
In entrusting the evaluation to exp
- Page 115 and 116:
of the major performing arts organi
- Page 117 and 118:
Clarity of intent and commitment to
- Page 119 and 120:
tional structure in determining art
- Page 121 and 122:
Supportive Networks (conditional el
- Page 123 and 124:
CODA: COMBINING MEASURES OF EXPERIE
- Page 125 and 126:
dimensions in the shaded boxes have
- Page 127 and 128:
The 2012 DCA report assures readers
- Page 129 and 130:
Bailey, Jackie 2009a. Defining arti
- Page 131 and 132:
Margaret Bolton and Clare Cooper. 2
- Page 133 and 134:
Chappell, Michael, and John Knell.
- Page 135 and 136:
Falk, John H and Lynn D Dierking. 2
- Page 137 and 138:
Johanson, Kaya. 2013. ‘Listening
- Page 139 and 140:
Marsh, Kevin, and Evelina Bertranou
- Page 141 and 142:
New Economics Foundation. 2008. Cap
- Page 143 and 144:
Reason, Matthew. 2004. ‘Theatre a
- Page 145 and 146:
Throsby, David. 2010. The Economics
- Page 147 and 148:
Williams, Tandi. 2011. Community Re
- Page 149 and 150:
Hegarty, C Boyd. 2009. ‘The value
- Page 151 and 152:
APPENDIX TABLES Table A-1 A groupin
- Page 153 and 154:
Table A-3 A grouping of indicators
- Page 155 and 156:
Table A-5 A grouping of indicators