08.01.2015 Views

PAD - LGED

PAD - LGED

PAD - LGED

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

accordance with the “Rule of a Half”, whereby only half of the product of differential vehicle<br />

operating costs and of differential vehicle-km is taken as the value of benefits. It is assumed that<br />

generated traffic will develop over three years from the first year of operation of the improved<br />

road, as follows: (i) 20 percent for the first year; (ii) 60 percent for the second year; and (iii) 100<br />

percent during the third year.<br />

18. Overall VOC savings were found to be substantial in the case of the first RTIP-I project,<br />

reducing by 15-25 percent where a road with an IRI of ten was improved and by 40-60 percent<br />

where a road with an IRI of 18 was improved. 20 Results from the initial appraisals of RTIP-II<br />

road projects indicate a similar order of VOC savings.<br />

19. Due to data limitation, it was not possible to estimate the VOC benefits arising from<br />

diverted traffic (i.e. traffic which may be diverted from other parts of the road network at a<br />

considerable saving in vehicle operating costs). It is likely that the addition of these benefits<br />

would result in a substantial increase in project EIRRs. A similar remark could apply in the case<br />

of changes in the modal distribution of the traffic on project roads, especially those involving the<br />

transfer of traffic from Non-motorized to Motorized forms of transport.<br />

iv) Results of economic appraisal and sensitivity analysis:<br />

20. The detailed economic appraisal was carried out for each proposed roads sub-project (See<br />

Economic Appraisal background paper for more details). The analysis for each road calculates<br />

base case values for EIRR, and ENPV. These results have been subjected to sensitivity tests,<br />

involving:<br />

• An increase of 20 per cent in project costs;<br />

• A decrease of 20 per cent in project benefits;<br />

• A combined increase of 20 per cent in project costs and a 20 per cent decrease in project<br />

benefits;<br />

• Restriction of benefits to normal and generated traffic (ie. excluding household income<br />

benefits);<br />

• Restricting benefits to normal traffic only; and<br />

• Switching value analysis (increased cost and reduced benefits)<br />

(i) Upazila road improvement<br />

21. The economic appraisal of the UZR improvement component was carried out for 103<br />

UZR, with a total length to be upgraded of 734 km. In general, these sub-projects have the<br />

potential for high economic returns, owing to the fact that most of the candidate roads have<br />

undeveloped earthen surfaces and with improvement will have a major impact in terms of<br />

expanding community access, generating increased household incomes, reducing roughness, and<br />

saving vehicle operating costs. The weighted average EIRR is 41 percent and all the roads<br />

appraised have a base case EIRR greater than 12 percent. The weighted average is ENPV of<br />

US$348 million. The results are robust if cost increases up to 118 percent or benefit decreases up<br />

to 54 percent. However, when the benefits exclude the income benefits, the viability of the<br />

component is below the 12 percent threshold.<br />

20 World Bank, Project Appraisal Document on a Proposed Credit in the Amount of SDR 138 milliom (US$ 190 million<br />

equivalent) to the People’s Republic of Bangladesh for the Rural Transport Improvement Project, May 22, 2003.<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!