PAD - LGED

Overall Risk
Provide adequate training on quality assurance to local contractors prior to the start of the works.
Resp:
Client Stage: Imple
mentat
ion
Risk Management:
Recurrent:
Due
Date:
Prepare quality assurance guidelines in local language.
Resp:
Client Stage: Prepar
ation
Risk Management:
Recurrent:
Due
Date:
Performance assessment are included in the contracts of supervision consultants.
Resp: Stage: Prepar
ation
Risk Management:
Recurrent:
Due
Date:
30-Apr-2013 Frequency: Status: Not Yet
Due
31-Dec-2013 Frequency: Status: Not Yet
Due
31-Dec-2012 Frequency: Status: In
Progress
Engage a Project Management Consultant to support LGED in ensuring quality control.
Resp: Stage: Imple
mentat
ion
Recurrent:
Due
Date:
Preparation Risk Rating: Substantial Implementation Risk Rating: Substantial
Description:
The risk rating for the project is assessed as substantial to reflect the overall
weak governance environment in the country and complexity of the project
which will cover 26 districts and will aim to upgrade, rehabilitate and maintain a
large portion of the LGED road network and will support institutional
strengthening agenda for the LGED. Unbiased selection of roads is a major
challenge and is expected to be mitigated by an agreed selection methodology.
The risks of stretched and limited capacity of LGED to implement the project in
26 districts, potential risks with land acquisition and governance risks add to the
challenge. Prior experience of the LGED in satisfactorily implementing the
RTIP-I and agreed measures are expected to mitigate risks during
implementation.
Description:
31-Dec-2012 Frequency: Status: Not Yet
Due
Risk during implementation is assessed as substantial to reflect the risks of
stretched and limited capacity to implement the project in 26 districts, potential
risks with land acquisition and governance risks. Prior experience of the LGED
in satisfactorily implementing the RTIP-I and agreed risk mitigation measures
are expected to mitigate implementation risks.
56