08.01.2015 Views

PAD - LGED

PAD - LGED

PAD - LGED

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

B. Project Financing<br />

1. Lending Instrument<br />

34. The Bank's investment lending instrument selected for the proposed project consists of a<br />

Specific Investment Loan (SIL). <strong>LGED</strong> has substantial experience with the Bank’s financial<br />

management, disbursement procedures and financial reporting requirements. <strong>LGED</strong> will have an<br />

effective accounting system in place for project financial management (FM) requirements at<br />

project effectiveness. By project mid-term, <strong>LGED</strong> will develop a well-advanced comprehensive<br />

<strong>LGED</strong>-wide transaction based FMS. Additional details, including project FM arrangements, are<br />

in Annex 3.<br />

2. Project Cost and Financing<br />

35. Total project costs are estimated at US$417 million (about Takas 3,500 crores). The<br />

Bank’s projected contribution is US$302 million. Detailed costs estimates in US dollars are<br />

provided in the table below. Annex 2 contains a detailed cost table.<br />

Component<br />

Table 1: Proposed Project Cost Summary for RTIP-II<br />

Indicative % of GoB<br />

Costs (US$M) Total (US$M) gob<br />

WB<br />

(US$M)<br />

rpa<br />

% of WB's<br />

Share<br />

Component A: Accessibility Improvement 338.1 81% 83.9 254.2 75%<br />

Component B: Institutional<br />

11.9 3% 0.8 10.6 90%<br />

Strengthening, Capacity Building and<br />

Governance Enhancement<br />

Component C: Road Safety 3.5 0% 0.2 3.2 90%<br />

Component D: Contingent Emergency<br />

0 0% 0.0 0.0 0%<br />

Response Component<br />

Physical Contingency (10%) 32.1 8% 8.2 23.9 74%<br />

Price Contingency (4%) 12.8 3% 3.3 9.6 74%<br />

Sub-Total 398.4 96% 96.5 302.0 76%<br />

Other GoB Overhead Costs 18.7 4% 18.7 0.0 0%<br />

Grand Total 417.1 100% 115.1 302.0 72%<br />

C. Program Objective and Phases (If Applicable):<br />

Not applicable.<br />

D. Lessons Learned Under RTIP-I<br />

36. The project design has benefited from implementation of the recently completed RTIP-I,<br />

as well as other Bank-funded rural road projects completed in recent years. <strong>LGED</strong> has attained<br />

extensive experience through implementing three Bank-funded projects, and has capacity to<br />

implement the proposed project. The main lessons learnt and incorporated in the proposed<br />

project design are described below and in Annex 11:<br />

• Project Supervision. Effective supervision of large and dispersed rural road improvement<br />

and maintenance contracts was challenging for <strong>LGED</strong>’s existing capacity. <strong>LGED</strong>’s staffing<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!