PAD - LGED

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Issues / Risk Mitigating Actions to be taken Agency Responsible accountability Strengthen internal accountability during RTIP-II LGED implementation by (a) strengthening LGED’s project management capacity with project management consultant (b) carrying out financial audits and integrated performance audits (by external independent auditors) Operationalize the M&E framework established under RTIP-I Improve processes and systems by preparing IT-ICT- MIS strategy and action plan and implementing the recommended actions with RTIP-II support Poor Quality of Service Need to improve Use Performance Management in RTIP-II with quality of works performance targets for: on project roads (a) project districts as decision criteria to continue allocating project resources during implementation; and (b) supervision consultants Carry out Integrated Performance Audit to evaluate compliance with technical specifications in civil works contracts and with environmental and social safeguards Timeline September 2012 February 15 and August 15 of each year Early Warning Indicators Project management consultant not recruited or with delays Auditors not selected. Audit reports not provided or with delays Delays in addressing audit objections. LGED 2 nd year Guidelines for operationalization of M&E framework not adopted. LGED Within 3 rd year Lack of LGED-wide IT-ICT-MIS strategy. Agreed actions not implemented. LGED Annually Semi-annually No performance targets determined for districts No annual progress reports on Performance Management Intergrated Performance Auditor not selected Audit reports not provided or with delays High number of audit observations Audit observations not addressed or with delays ISO certification not obtained Quality Assurance and Management including ISO certification 3 rd year 70
Annex 7: The Selection Methodology for the Investments Component Bangladesh: Second Rural Transport Improvement Project (P123828) 1. This annex describes the selection methodology for investments under the following components: (i) RPM; (ii) UZR and UNR improvement; (iii) ghats improvement; and (iv) GCMs improvement. A multi-criteria methodology including physical and socio-economic indicators was applied to all the components. (i) RPM Component 2. The methodology described below aims to present the main criteria to prioritize the key roads in “maintainable condition” that will be selected for the RPM component under the project (about 3,550 km) and within it, those that are a priority for First Year (about 1,000km). 3. The 2011 LGED Rural Infrastructure Maintenance Management Unit (RIMMU) Road Inventory for the 26 project districts has been used as the data-base to select the roads for the RPM component. The inventory has complete information for about 21,400 km of roads (3,128 roads). 4. The following criteria were applied to identify the priority roads for the RPM component: - Roads should be in rural areas - Roads are suitable for Road Maintenance or Rehabilitation: o Whole length of road surface is BC or concrete; o Roads do not have cross-drainage gaps along the road alignment; and o IRI: Roads have IRI higher than six and lower than 13 - Minimum length: All UZR should be more than five km long and all UNR should be more than 3km long. - Minimum carriageway width: UZR should have a carriageway width of more than 3m and all UNR should have a carriageway width of more than 2.75m. - Traffic volume: All roads with AADT higher than 4,000 and/or CVD higher than 1,000 were excluded and roads with and AADT> 800 and a CVD more than 100 were given priority. 5. This process of applying these selection criteria for the RPM component reduces the 21,400 km of roads (3,128 roads) in the inventory to a long-list of 3,804 km (451 roads). Prioritization of Roads for First Year 6. Since a maximum of 1,000km of roads can be included in the first year, an indicative number of km of roads were identified to be targeted for each of the 26 districts based on a score formed by three equally weighted factors: (i) Population (the district with the highest population was given a score of one and the other districts were score pro-rata); (ii) Poverty (the district with the highest percentage of poor people was given a score of one. The district with the highest percentage of people living in extreme poverty was also given a score of one. The other districts were given score pro-rata. The simple average of both score was then computed); and 71
Page 1 and 2:
Document of The World Bank FOR OFFI
Page 3 and 4:
Bangladesh: Second Rural Transport
Page 5 and 6:
. . . . . . . . . PAD DATA SHEET Ba
Page 7 and 8:
. The Recipient shall not displace
Page 9 and 10:
I. STRATEGIC CONTEXT A. Country Con
Page 11 and 12:
according to police data (actual fa
Page 13 and 14:
implementation progress in the last
Page 15 and 16:
23. Sub Component A1: Rural Roads I
Page 17 and 18:
B. Project Financing 1. Lending Ins
Page 19 and 20:
Agriculture, Water Resources and Ru
Page 21 and 22:
financing comes down to no more tha
Page 23 and 24:
Imrprovement Total/weighted average
Page 25 and 26:
64. LGED has adequate government su
Page 27 and 28: 74. LGED will follow the Gender Str
Page 29 and 30: . . Annex 1: Results and Monitoring
Page 31 and 32: All 5 shops in WMS per Growth Cente
Page 33 and 34: ut on outputs (outcomes) in terms o
Page 35 and 36: (v) Strengthening of LGED strategic
Page 37 and 38: activities. Another Train-the-Train
Page 39 and 40: Table 2.1 Detailed Project Cost Tab
Page 41 and 42: 4. LGED started the process of sele
Page 43 and 44: accounting systems. LGED will compl
Page 45 and 46: Internal Auditors. The findings of
Page 47 and 48: completed specialized training arra
Page 49 and 50: Sl. no. Description World Bank (Pri
Page 51 and 52: waterways component may have signif
Page 53 and 54: in two daily Newspapers (English an
Page 55 and 56: 56. A decision agreed with the aggr
Page 58 and 59: (LGED) Project Management Organogra
Page 60 and 61: LGED does not have adequate capacit
Page 62 and 63: Social and Environmental Rating Sub
Page 64 and 65: Overall Risk Provide adequate train
Page 66 and 67: • The Integrated Performance Audi
Page 68 and 69: capacity of FM staff, review of aud
Page 70 and 71: Time Focus Skills Needed Resource E
Page 72 and 73: strengthen governance in the rural
Page 74 and 75: • Monitoring and Evaluation Syste
Page 76 and 77: Table 6: GAAP Matrix Issues / Risk
Page 80 and 81: (iii) Maintainable road needs (the
Page 82 and 83: (iii)Ghats improvement component 18
Page 84 and 85: District Upazila Table 7.1: Final L
Page 86 and 87: District Upazila Road Code Road Nam
Page 88 and 89: Table 7.3: List of Candidate UNR Ro
Page 90 and 91: Table 7.5: List of Candidate UNR Ro
Page 92 and 93: District Upazila Road Code Road Nam
Page 94 and 95: Table 7.8: List of Candidate UZR Ro
Page 96 and 97: District Upazila Selected GCM Distr
Page 98 and 99: Table 8.1: Calculation of economic
Page 100 and 101: increase was reduced by half, since
Page 102 and 103: Table 8.4: Economic returns of upaz
Page 104 and 105: makes adequate allowance for the im
Page 106 and 107: cargo boats and an additional 20 pa
Page 108 and 109: ii) Measurement of Economic Costs:
Page 110 and 111: passenger transport cost is expecte
Page 112 and 113: Table 9.2: Geometric Dimension of U
Page 114 and 115: GROWTH CENTRE MARKETS (GCM) 14. Mar
Page 116 and 117: fixed monthly payments against comp
Page 118 and 119: 10. Performance indicators and insp
Page 120 and 121: US$1.1 million), with a total estim
Page 122 and 123: Item Performance Standard Measureme
Page 124 and 125: Item Performance Standard Measureme
Page 126 and 127: Annex 11: Rural Transport Improveme
Page 128 and 129:
accounting firm with IT experience
Page 130 and 131:
Annex 12: Rural Water Transport Imp
Page 132 and 133:
Project Implementation Schedule (co
show all

PAD - LGED

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?