23.01.2015 Views

Strategic Supply Chain Management - Supply Chain Online

Strategic Supply Chain Management - Supply Chain Online

Strategic Supply Chain Management - Supply Chain Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AVON PROFILE: Calling on Customers Cost-Effectively 93<br />

switch from one product to another. Changeover costs were high—especially<br />

since the factories were set up for high-volume production.<br />

Slow-selling products also were costly. In every selling cycle a<br />

number of products would sell less than forecast, so Avon had a growing<br />

amount of unsold merchandise. Avon’s inventory levels were high—as<br />

much as 150 days’ worth was typical—far too high for a three-week selling<br />

cycle. And most of this inventory consisted of unsold items. The capital<br />

tied up in inventory would only increase as Avon’s business expanded<br />

in Europe.<br />

Language variants presented another growth-related problem. Avon<br />

bought preprinted containers from its suppliers. With new markets came<br />

new languages and a growing number of print variants. Given its manufacture-to-forecast<br />

approach and the suppliers’ lead times, Avon had to<br />

order a wide range of preprinted containers well before it knew what its<br />

sales volumes actually would be in the different markets. This was becoming<br />

increasingly complex—and wasteful. Avon often would have demand<br />

in one country that couldn’t be filled because the only containers on hand<br />

were printed in another language.<br />

Fixing these problems and transforming the supply chain would be<br />

an enormous undertaking, one that needed support and a big financial<br />

commitment from corporate management.<br />

MAKING THE BUSINESS CASE AND MOVING FORWARD<br />

It required a lengthy, detailed analysis to prove that Avon’s supply chain<br />

wouldn’t be able to handle the projected growth of the business. Even<br />

then, it took 18 months to build the business case and get executive buyin<br />

to move forward with the far-reaching changes needed. Convincing the<br />

organization to invest money that wouldn’t be recouped until the later<br />

years of the transformation was a tough sell. In fact, the first two years<br />

would result in a net loss. “This delayed payback was an uncomfortable<br />

notion, especially given that Avon had never invested much in the supply<br />

chain before and wanted quicker results,” explains Michael Watson, director<br />

of Avon’s supply chain transformation. “It was very difficult getting<br />

that initial momentum going.”<br />

By the time Avon started the project, however, corporate buy-in was<br />

absolute, and management had committed an extraordinary level of<br />

resources. Notes Watson, “We took 45 of our best people in Europe out<br />

of their existing positions and put them into the project full time for 18<br />

months.” Removing these people from day-to-day operations was extremely

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!