23.01.2015 Views

Strategic Supply Chain Management - Supply Chain Online

Strategic Supply Chain Management - Supply Chain Online

Strategic Supply Chain Management - Supply Chain Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 2 Core Discipline 2: Develop an End-to-End Process Architecture 75<br />

In addition to analyzing the overall configuration, you also will consider<br />

best practices, applications, metrics, and organizational models as<br />

part of your level 3 “to be” design. By analyzing your current capabilities<br />

versus your “to be” design, you’ll understand the implications for the<br />

existing processes and information systems. Typical information systems<br />

implications include system gaps, missing data, and insufficient integration<br />

between information systems. Then you can evaluate each “to be”<br />

option based on the business criteria set at SCOR level 1 and choose<br />

which to develop at the operable level (level 4) of detail needed for a real<br />

working solution.<br />

Case in point: We worked with a large retailer that needed to<br />

reduce inventory levels without sacrificing service. The company has<br />

hundreds of retail locations, ranging from megastores to neighborhood<br />

grocery outlets. It had grown through acquisition, and as new acquisitions<br />

were made, the acquired businesses were established as independent<br />

business units. Some functions were shared, including purchasing,<br />

warehouse management, and accounting. For the most part, however,<br />

each business unit was allowed to operate independently, maintaining its<br />

own processes and information systems. This practice led to very high<br />

information-systems costs due to different applications, each requiring<br />

dedicated, ongoing support.<br />

The company had been frustrated by several failed efforts to improve<br />

its overall performance; it had spent months mapping its key processes<br />

and analyzing the resulting improvement opportunities. Still, the project<br />

team was not able to reach agreement on the “to be” supply chain. The<br />

major roadblock was the lack of an overall architecture. Team members<br />

were not even able to agree on which processes were part of the supply<br />

chain and which were not! Moreover, processes within specific functions<br />

were well defined, but those which cut across functions, such as supply<br />

chain planning, were not.<br />

To break the deadlock, the team used SCOR level 3 to map its current<br />

processes. An analysis of the deliver process elements showed that the<br />

physical supply chain was highly optimized in terms of warehousing operations<br />

and that highly developed processes were in place to ensure the best<br />

handling of its products from suppliers to retail locations. Examination of<br />

warehouse practices revealed the adoption of many leading-edge warehouse<br />

management practices, such as picking and order preparation using<br />

voice-recognition technology.<br />

An analysis of the plan and source process elements revealed that<br />

the supply chain had been optimized to move high volumes of consumer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!