13.06.2015 Views

ABCD-Training-of-Trainers-Tools-July-2013

ABCD-Training-of-Trainers-Tools-July-2013

ABCD-Training-of-Trainers-Tools-July-2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ask the group who they think is at the top <strong>of</strong><br />

the field (triangle): who has the most<br />

influence with regards to how development<br />

happens on the ground? Often people<br />

mention our government, but you can ask<br />

who even influences how our government<br />

operates – international role players are<br />

surfaced. You can ask the group to mention<br />

any role players they are familiar with, like<br />

the European Union, World Bank,<br />

International Monetary Fund, UNICEF, etc.<br />

Explain the key role players and what their<br />

influence might be.<br />

The next level is allocated for government and<br />

business. These were originally two separate<br />

categories but now with so much cross over<br />

between politics and economics, it seems<br />

fitting to put them together using examples to<br />

illustrate their interdependence like Black<br />

Economic Empowerment, government<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficials having shares in major companies,<br />

and needing substantial financial backing to<br />

even stand for election.<br />

Next level is for institutions like universities, churches, schools etc. that develop curricula and<br />

development theory which practitioners are <strong>of</strong>ten schooled in.<br />

NGOs are the next level followed by CBOs and finally the community.<br />

It is <strong>of</strong>ten important to clarify the differences between an NGO and CBO in terms <strong>of</strong> where the driving<br />

force usually comes from. These lines however tend to be more blurred nowadays with many NGO and<br />

government initiated CBOs! Both can register as nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organizations (NPOs) which can also be<br />

clarified.<br />

The gaps in between the levels are for gatekeepers which you can now fill in as there are gatekeepers at<br />

all levels – those who hold the ‘keys to the gate’, who may keep information and opportunities more for<br />

their own interests and block the flow to other levels. The flip side can also be true if we think <strong>of</strong> the<br />

important role <strong>of</strong> ‘gappers’ – those who positively move between the different levels and open the<br />

doors for collective interests. They are also sometimes the ‘shock absorbers’ who are able to hold the<br />

tensions that come at times in dealing with the complexity, bureaucracy and patronizing attitudes <strong>of</strong><br />

others. Ask the group where the bulk <strong>of</strong> resources tends to be – top or bottom. The diagram indicates<br />

this to be at the top which in many cases is true (for example, it may cost R1 million to distribute R10<br />

000 at community level) because <strong>of</strong> extraction by intermediary agencies. If you are aware <strong>of</strong> examples<br />

that illustrate this imbalance, you can elaborate.<br />

Ask the group where revolution tends to come from: top or bottom? Rightly, it usually comes from the<br />

bottom as people at higher levels tend to be comfortable in maintaining the status quo and their<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!