13.06.2015 Views

ABCD-Training-of-Trainers-Tools-July-2013

ABCD-Training-of-Trainers-Tools-July-2013

ABCD-Training-of-Trainers-Tools-July-2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.10. a. Levels <strong>of</strong> Engagement<br />

(Source: Ninnette Eliasov)<br />

Session Title<br />

Session Objectives<br />

Duration <strong>of</strong> Session<br />

Resources<br />

<strong>Training</strong> Materials<br />

Levels <strong>of</strong> Engagement<br />

Explore advantages and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> partnerships<br />

between development actors and communities (from least empowering<br />

to most): inform, consult, participate, partner, own<br />

Learn about tools to foster transparency in partnerships<br />

25 minutes<br />

Flipchart paper<br />

Markers<br />

Levels <strong>of</strong> Engagement Chart<br />

Introduction<br />

The development field is complicated and relationships can be confusing. The term partnership has<br />

become used very loosely. In spite <strong>of</strong> good intentions, there is <strong>of</strong>ten a lack <strong>of</strong> transparency particularly<br />

around budget and program design. Community partners are <strong>of</strong>ten informed (or at best consulted)<br />

about projects that have already been designed months before from the outside based on a scant<br />

‘needs assessment’. These may be <strong>of</strong>fered as ‘community owned’ but the community <strong>of</strong>ten has less<br />

power or knowledge about the process. It is not surprising that many externally driven programs are not<br />

as successful or sustainable as they could be. People also sometimes feel manipulated or used and may<br />

get tired <strong>of</strong> participating. This can bring a feeling <strong>of</strong> apathy.<br />

This tool can assist community members (and partners) to be clear and honest about what type <strong>of</strong><br />

engagements they are proposing and gauge how empowering this will be for the community. It can also<br />

assist community members to make decisions about how they want to engage with others and to<br />

negotiate for more beneficial relationships. It is particularly helpful at the beginning <strong>of</strong> a networking or<br />

partnership-building process to clarify the level <strong>of</strong> engagement. It can also be useful to assess<br />

relationships that may be breaking down and gain clarity about what is going on. The intention is to<br />

encourage true transparency and to shift relationships from less to more empowering possibilities which<br />

serve community interest. The tool may help a group to discuss possible advantages and disadvantages<br />

<strong>of</strong> a particular relationship and to decide whether they should pursue it or not. It can also assist role<br />

players to monitor and review the relationship and how it may shift over time.<br />

Below you will find two activities that demonstrate different levels <strong>of</strong> engagement between the<br />

predominant development actors.<br />

Activity 1: Levels <strong>of</strong> Engagement<br />

Instructions<br />

Ask for a volunteer from the group to come up with you. Ask this person to (gently) push you around. Be<br />

reactive. In other words if they push you to the left you go left, if they push you back, you move back.<br />

You are not doing much just reacting to what they are doing. Then ask the person to come and try their<br />

luck again. This time you are prepared. You decide which way to move, whether you allow them to push<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!