13.06.2015 Views

ABCD-Training-of-Trainers-Tools-July-2013

ABCD-Training-of-Trainers-Tools-July-2013

ABCD-Training-of-Trainers-Tools-July-2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2. Entry Points<br />

(Source: Coady International Institute)<br />

Session Title<br />

Session Objectives<br />

Duration <strong>of</strong> Session<br />

Resources<br />

<strong>Training</strong> Materials<br />

Entry Points<br />

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> different community entry<br />

points for introducing <strong>ABCD</strong><br />

30 minutes<br />

None<br />

None<br />

Introduction<br />

Facilitators that choose to apply an <strong>ABCD</strong> methodology must first decide which community to work<br />

with. In many cases, CBOs, NGOs or government <strong>of</strong>fices have a history <strong>of</strong> working with communities in a<br />

way that may be quite different from the <strong>ABCD</strong> approach. In fact, the NGO or government <strong>of</strong>fice may<br />

have focused more on needs than assets. The CBO, NGO or government <strong>of</strong>fice, while using participatory<br />

methodologies, may actually have been the driver, rather than the facilitator, <strong>of</strong> community<br />

development. Adopting <strong>ABCD</strong> requires a shift in approach as well as methodology.<br />

It is <strong>of</strong>ten difficult to determine which communities are appropriate to work with using an <strong>ABCD</strong><br />

methodology. The most common dilemma is whether to work in a community where it has worked<br />

before and try to shift to an <strong>ABCD</strong> approach, or start a fresh relationship with a new community. There<br />

are pros and cons to each choice. An advantage to working with an existing community is that field staff<br />

may have developed strong relationships with key leaders and community associations. A disadvantage<br />

to this strategy is the community may be used to a relationship based on needs and may have<br />

developed a relationship <strong>of</strong> dependence on the NGO or government that may be hard to break.<br />

Whichever type <strong>of</strong> community you decide to begin with, it is important to find a community where<br />

there is a high probability <strong>of</strong> success using an <strong>ABCD</strong> methodology, if this approach is to spread to other<br />

communities. This means doing some “purposeful reconnaissance” to find a community(ies) where, for<br />

example, there may be:<br />

• a history <strong>of</strong> endogenous community development<br />

• a high level <strong>of</strong> social capital<br />

• strong local leadership<br />

• a good relationship with local government<br />

Finding communities like this requires taking the time to talk to field staff, local government <strong>of</strong>ficials,<br />

other key informants, and, <strong>of</strong> course, members <strong>of</strong> the prospective communities.<br />

Instructions<br />

Ask participants to form small groups. If there are people from the same organization at the training,<br />

they should be in one group together. If not, these groups can be formed randomly. Ask the groups to<br />

discuss the following questions:<br />

• How do you currently decide which community groups to work with?<br />

76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!