5 - 16 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WEST CARPATHIANSunit, Western Carpathians (Slovakia): P-T conditions<strong>and</strong> in situ Ar-40/Ar-39 UV laser probe dating<strong>of</strong> metapelites, J. Metamorph. Geol., 19, 197 – 216,2001b.Ježek, J., K. Schulmann, <strong>and</strong> A. B. Thompson, Strainpartitioning, strike slip faulting <strong>and</strong> the development<strong>of</strong> strain parameters in front <strong>of</strong> an obpliquelyconvergent indenter, in Continental Collision <strong>and</strong>Tectonosedimentary Evolution <strong>of</strong> Forel<strong>and</strong>s, EGSStephan Mueller Spec. Publ. Ser., vol.1,editedby G. Bertotti, K. Schulmann, <strong>and</strong> S. Cloetingh,pp. 145 – 165, Eur. Geophys. Soc., London, 2002.Kantor, J., Ar 40 /K 40 method <strong>of</strong> absolute age determination<strong>of</strong> rocks <strong>and</strong> their application to theBetliar granite, Geol. Práce Zprávy., 11, 188–200, 1957.Knipe, R. J., Chemical changes during slaty cleavagedevelopment, Bull. Mineral., 102, 206 – 209, 1979.Knipe, R. J., Deformation mechanisms: Recognitionfrom natural tectonites, J. Struct. Geol., 11, 127 –146, 1989.Korikovskij, S. P., E. Krist, <strong>and</strong> V. A. Boronikhin,Staurolite-chloritoid schists from Klenovec region:Prograde metamorphism <strong>of</strong> high-alumina rocks <strong>of</strong>the Kohút zone: Veporides, Geol. Zbor. Geol. Carpath.,39, 187 – 200, 1989.Korikovskij, S. P., S. Jacko, <strong>and</strong> V. A. Boronichin,Facial conditions <strong>of</strong> Variscan prograde metamorphismin the Lodina complex <strong>of</strong> Èierna hora crystalline,eastern Slovakia, Miner. Slovaca, 22, 225–230, 1990.Kováčik, M., J. Král’, <strong>and</strong> H. Maluski, Metamorphicrocks in the southern Veporicum: Their Alpinemetamorphism <strong>and</strong> thermochronologic evolution,Miner. Slovaca, 28, 185 – 202, 1996.Maluski, H., P. Rajlich, <strong>and</strong> P. Matte, 40 Ar- 39 Ar dating<strong>of</strong> the Inner Carpathians Variscan basement <strong>and</strong>Alpine mylonitic overprinting, Tectonophysics,223, 313 – 337, 1993.Máška, M., Poznámky k předtercierní metalogenesiZápadních Karpat, zvláště Spišsko-gemerskéhorudohoří, Geol. Práce, 46, 96 – 106, 1957.Matějka, A., <strong>and</strong> D. Andrusov, Overview <strong>of</strong> the Geology<strong>of</strong> West Carpathians in the Central Slovakia<strong>and</strong> Adjacent Regions, 163 pp., Státní Geol. Úst.Praha, Prague, 1931.Méres, S., <strong>and</strong> D. Hovorka, Alpine metamorphicrecrystallization <strong>of</strong> the pre-Carboniferous metapelites<strong>of</strong> the Kohut crystalline complex (the WesternCarpathians), Miner. Slovaca, 23, 435 – 442, 1991.Mock, R., <strong>and</strong> P. Reichwalder, The blueschist belt <strong>of</strong>the Slovak karst, Slovakia, Terra Abstr., 4, 46,1992.Morgan, P., <strong>and</strong> I. B. Ramberg, Physical changes in thelithosphere associated with thermal relaxation afterrifting, Tectonophysics, 143, 1 – 11, 1987.Németh, Z., L. Gazdačko, D. Návesňák, <strong>and</strong> J. Kobulský,Polyphase tectonic evolution <strong>of</strong> the Gemericum(the Western Carpathians) outlined by review <strong>of</strong><strong>structural</strong> <strong>and</strong> deformational data, in GeologicalEvolution <strong>of</strong> the Western Carpathians, edited byP. Grecula, D. Hovorka, <strong>and</strong> M. Putiš, pp. 215 –224, Geocomplex, Bratislava, Slovakia, 1997.Pantó, G.,A.Kovács, K. Balogh, <strong>and</strong> Z. Sámsoni,Rb-Sr check <strong>of</strong> Assyntian <strong>and</strong> Caledonian metamorphism<strong>and</strong> igneous activity in NE Hungary,Acta Geol. Acad. Sci. Hung., 11, 279 – 282, 1967.Passchier, C. W., <strong>and</strong> R. A. J. Trouw, Microtectonics,289 pp., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996.Pl<strong>and</strong>erová, E., <strong>and</strong> A. Vozárová, Upper Carboniferousin southern Veporides, Geol. Práce Zprávy., 70,129 – 141, 1978.Plašienka, D., Mosozoic tectonic evolution <strong>of</strong> the epi-Variscan continental crust <strong>of</strong> the Western Carpathians:A tentative model, Miner. Slovaca, 23,447 – 457, 1991.Plašienka, D., Cleavages <strong>and</strong> folds in changing tectonicregimes: The Vel’ký Bok Mesozoic cover unit <strong>of</strong>the Veporicum (Nízke Tatry Mts., central WesternCarpathians), Slovak Geol. Mag., 2–95, 97 – 113,1995.Plašienka, D., Cretaceous tectonochronology <strong>of</strong> thecentral Western Carpathians, Slovakia, Geol. Carpath.,48, 99 – 111, 1997.Plašienka, D., P. Grecula, M. Putiš, M. Kováč, <strong>and</strong>D. Hovorka, Evolution <strong>and</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> the WesternCarpathians: An overview, in Geological Evolution<strong>of</strong> the Western Carpathians, edited by P. Grecula,D. Hovorka, <strong>and</strong> M. Putiš, pp. 1 – 24, Geocomplex,Bratislava, Slovakia, 1997.Poller, U., P. Uher, I. Broska, D. Plašienka, <strong>and</strong>M. Janák, First Permian-Early Triassic zircon agesfor tin-bearing granites from the Gemeric unit(Western Carpathians, Slovakia): Connection tothe post-collisional extension <strong>of</strong> the Variscanorogen <strong>and</strong> S-type granite magmatism, Terra Nova,14, 41 – 48, 2002.Schmid, S. M., O. A. Pfiffner, N. Froitzheim,G. Schoenborn, <strong>and</strong> E. Kissling, Geophysicalgeologicaltransect <strong>and</strong> tectonic evolution <strong>of</strong> theSwiss-Italian Alps, Tectonics, 15, 1036 – 1064,1996.Siddans, A. W. B., Slaty cleavage: A review <strong>of</strong> researchsince 1815, Earth Sci. Rev., 8, 205 – 232, 1972.Siman, P., V. Johan, P. Ledru, V. Bezák, <strong>and</strong> J. Madarás,Deformation <strong>and</strong> p-T conditions estimated in‘‘layered migmatites’’ from southern part <strong>of</strong> Veporicumcrystalline basement (Western Carpathians,Slovakia), Slovak Geol. Mag., 3 – 4/96, 209 – 213,1996.Sintubin, M., Arcuate fold <strong>and</strong> cleavage patterns in thesoutheastern part <strong>of</strong> the Anglo-Brabant Fold Belt(Belgium): Tectonic implications, Tectonophysics,309, 81 – 97, 1999.Snopko, L., <strong>and</strong> P. Reichwalder, Tektonická mapaSpišsko-Gemerského rudohoria, Geol. Ústav DionýzaŠtúra, a Bratislava, Slovakia, 1970.Sorby, H. C., On the origin <strong>of</strong> slaty cleavage, NewPhilos. J., 55, 137 – 148, 1853.Soták, J., A. Vozárová, <strong>and</strong> J. Ivanička, New micr<strong>of</strong>ossilsfrom the early Paleozoic formations <strong>of</strong> theGemericum (Foraminiferida), Geol. Carpath., 50,72 – 74, 1999.Šucha, V., <strong>and</strong> D. D. Eberl, Burial metamorphism <strong>of</strong> thePermian sediments from the Western Carpathians,Miner. Slovaca, 24/5, 399 – 405, 1992.Teyssier, C., <strong>and</strong> B. Tik<strong>of</strong>f, Study <strong>of</strong> strike-slip partitioningin California resolves San Andreas discrepancy<strong>and</strong> constrains lithospheric structure, Geol.Soc. Am. Abstr. Programs, 29, 347, 1997.Teyssier, C., K. Kleinspehn, <strong>and</strong> J. Pershing, Analysis<strong>of</strong> fault populations in western Spitsbergen: Implicationsfor deformation partitioning along transformmargins, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 107, 68 – 82, 1995.Tik<strong>of</strong>f, B., <strong>and</strong> C. Teyssier, Strain <strong>modelling</strong> <strong>of</strong> displacement-fieldpartitioning in transpressional orogens,J. Struct. Geol., 16, 1575 – 1588, 1994.Tomek, C., Deep crustal structure beneath the central<strong>and</strong> inner West Carpathians, Tectonophysics, 226,417 – 431, 1993.Tommasi, A., <strong>and</strong> A. Vauchez, Continental rifting parallelto ancient collisional belts: An effect <strong>of</strong> themechanical anisotropy <strong>of</strong> the lithospheric mantle,Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 185, 199 – 210, 2001.Treagus, S. H., <strong>and</strong> J. E. Treagus, Transected folds <strong>and</strong>transpression; how are they associated?, J. Struct.Geol., 14, 361 – 367, 1992.Trumpy, R., The timing <strong>of</strong> orogenic events in the centralAlps, in Gravity <strong>and</strong> Tectonics, pp. 229 – 251,John Wiley, Hobobken, N. J., 1973.Vozár, J., Paleogeografický vývoj Západných Karpát(Paleogeographical Evolution <strong>of</strong> the West Carpathians),346 pp., Geol. Ústav Dionýza Štúra, Bratislava,Slovakia, 1978.Vozár, J., <strong>and</strong> J. Šantavý, Atlas <strong>of</strong> Deep Reflection SeismicPr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> the Western Carpathians <strong>and</strong> TheirInterpretation, GSSR, Bratislava, Slovakia, 1999.Vozár, J., Č. Tomek, A. Vozárová, J. Mello, <strong>and</strong>J. Ivanička, Seismic section G-1, Geol. Práce,101, 32 – 34, 1996.Vozárová, A., Development <strong>of</strong> metamorphism in theGemeric/Veporic contact zone (Western Carpathians),Geol. Zbor. Geol. Carpath., 41, 475–502, 1990.Vozárová, A., Variscan metamorphism <strong>and</strong> crustal evolutionin the Gemericum (in Slovak), Záp. Karp.Sér. Miner. Petrol. Geochém. Metalogen., 16, 55–117, 1993.Vozárová, A., J. Soták, <strong>and</strong> J. Ivanička, Cambro-Ordovicianfossils (conodontes, foraminifers, chitinousshields) from the methamorphic series <strong>of</strong> theGemericum (western Carpathians), in Tenth Meeting<strong>of</strong> European Union <strong>of</strong> Geosciences, vol. 4, Abstracts,p. 266, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1999.Wood, D. S., Current views <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> slatycleavage, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 2, 369 –401, 1974.Woodcock, N. H., M. A. Awan, T. E. Johnson, A. H.Mackie, <strong>and</strong> R. D. A. Smith, Acadian tectonics <strong>of</strong>Wales during Avalonia Laurentia convergence, Tectonics,7, 483 – 495, 1988.J. Ježek, Institute <strong>of</strong> Applied Mathematics <strong>and</strong>Computer Science, Albertov 6, 128 43 Prague 2, CzechRepublic.O. Lexa <strong>and</strong> K. Schulmann, Institute <strong>of</strong> Petrology<strong>and</strong> Structural Geology, Albertov 6, 128 43 Prague 2,Czech Republic. (lexa@natur.cuni.cz)100
Journal <strong>of</strong> Structural Geology 26 (2004) 155–161www.elsevier.com/locate/jsgApparent shear-b<strong>and</strong> geometry resulting fromoblique fold sectionsOndrej Lexa a, *, John Cosgrove b , Karel Schulmann aa Institute <strong>of</strong> Petrology <strong>and</strong> Structural Geology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republicb Department <strong>of</strong> Earth Sciences <strong>and</strong> Engineering, Royal School <strong>of</strong> Mines, Imperial College, London SW7 2BP, UKReceived 1 May 2002; received in revised form 1 February 2003; accepted 4 April 2003AbstractSmall-scale shear zones inclined at intermediate angles to an earlier anisotropy are <strong>of</strong>ten observed in deformed rocks. They aretraditionally described as shear-b<strong>and</strong>s, C-b<strong>and</strong>s, extensional crenulation cleavage or normal kink-b<strong>and</strong>s formed as a result <strong>of</strong> extension alongthe anisotropy. Their asymmetries are widely used to describe the large-scale kinematics <strong>of</strong> deformation <strong>and</strong> the deformational history <strong>of</strong> agiven area. We demonstrate that when various three-dimensional fold structures are observed on two-dimensional outcrop surfaces or in thinsection, they can appear geometrically identical. We have developed a simple technique that allows the geometrical evaluation <strong>of</strong> any sectionacross a cylindrical fold <strong>of</strong> arbitrary geometry. The ranges <strong>of</strong> planar sections on which a fold exhibits shear-b<strong>and</strong> like geometry are presentedon a stereographic projection in order to simplify the determination <strong>of</strong> critical orientations. We demonstrate that for any fold geometry, thereare two distinct groups <strong>of</strong> sections showing shear-b<strong>and</strong> like geometry with opposite ‘senses <strong>of</strong> shear’ criteria systematically arranged aroundthe axial plane <strong>and</strong> which are inclined at a high angle to the major anisotropy. We provide a field example from Western Carpathians, wherekinematic analysis, mainly based on apparent extensional shear-b<strong>and</strong>s, led to overemphasis <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> post-orogenic extension on the final<strong>structural</strong> pattern <strong>of</strong> the belt.q 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Keywords: Shear-b<strong>and</strong> geometry; Oblique fold sections; Small-scale shear zones1. IntroductionSmall-scale shear zones inclined at intermediate angles to aprevious anisotropy are commonly observed in deformedrocks. They are traditionally presented as shear-b<strong>and</strong>s (White,1979), C 0 -b<strong>and</strong>s (Ponce <strong>and</strong> Choukroune, 1980), extensionalcrenulation cleavage (Platt, 1979, 1984; Platt <strong>and</strong> Vissers,1980), asymmetric boudinage, asymmetric folds or normalkink-b<strong>and</strong>s (Dewey, 1965; Cobbold et al., 1971; Cosgrove,1976) formed as a result <strong>of</strong> extension along the olderanisotropy or shortening normal to the anisotropy. Their‘sense <strong>of</strong> shear’ <strong>and</strong> geometrical relations are widely used todescribe the large-scale kinematics <strong>of</strong> deformation (Berthéet al., 1979; Simpson <strong>and</strong> Schmid, 1983; Lister <strong>and</strong> Snoke,1984) or the tectonic settings <strong>of</strong> the deformational history(Platt <strong>and</strong> Vissers, 1980; Behrmann, 1987).Shear b<strong>and</strong>s may resemble the compressional crenulation* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ420-22195-1531; fax: þ420-22195-1524.E-mail address: lexa@natur.cuni.cz (O. Lexa).0191-8141/03/$ - see front matter q 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/S0191-8141(03)00072-5cleavage but develop by extension <strong>of</strong> the older foliationrather than by shortening (Passchier <strong>and</strong> Trouw, 1996). Thisled some authors to use the terms compressional (CCC) <strong>and</strong>extensional (SBC) crenulation cleavages (Platt <strong>and</strong> Vissers,1980). Passchier <strong>and</strong> Trouw (1996) presented a summary <strong>of</strong>differences between these two contrasting structures. Theirmain argument for distinction between both kinds <strong>of</strong>structures is the angle <strong>of</strong> CCC with the older foliation,which generally ranges between 45 <strong>and</strong> 908, while for SBCthe angle to earlier foliation is less than 458. However, theangular distinction between CCC <strong>and</strong> SBC is not alwaysvalid. The compressional crenulation cleavage changes thegeometry in the pr<strong>of</strong>ile section towards the hinge direction<strong>of</strong> the folded domain, so that the internal rotation becomesless than 458 <strong>and</strong> may be easily misinterpreted as an SBC(Price <strong>and</strong> Cosgrove, 1994, p. 263, Fig. 10.50).From a kinematic point <strong>of</strong> view, CCC develops at a highangle to bulk shortening while SBC represents a single shearplane at small angle to the foliation (Passchier <strong>and</strong> Trouw,1996). In order to interpret the kinematic significance <strong>of</strong>both kinds <strong>of</strong> structures, they have to be observed in plane,101
- Page 3:
“It strikes me that all our knowl
- Page 8 and 9:
Contentsviii4.7 Schulmann, Konopás
- Page 11:
Dedicated to my wife Markéta, daug
- Page 14 and 15:
Foreword 2First topic “Quantitati
- Page 16 and 17:
Foreword 4source and freely availab
- Page 18 and 19:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 20 and 21:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 22 and 23:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 24 and 25:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 26 and 27:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 28 and 29:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 2Mechanisms of lower crusta
- Page 33 and 34:
2. Mechanisms of lower crustal flow
- Page 35 and 36:
2. Mechanisms of lower crustal flow
- Page 37 and 38:
2. Mechanisms of lower crustal flow
- Page 39 and 40:
2. Mechanisms of lower crustal flow
- Page 41 and 42:
Chapter 3Quantitative analyses ofme
- Page 43 and 44:
3. Quantitative analyses of metamor
- Page 45 and 46:
3. Quantitative analyses of metamor
- Page 47 and 48:
3. Quantitative analyses of metamor
- Page 49 and 50:
3. Quantitative analyses of metamor
- Page 51:
3. Quantitative analyses of metamor
- Page 54 and 55:
Bibliography 42Culshaw, N., Beaumon
- Page 56 and 57:
Bibliography 44sources and trigger
- Page 58 and 59:
Bibliography 46Skrzypek, E., Štíp
- Page 61 and 62: Journal of Structural Geology 23 20
- Page 63 and 64: J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 65 and 66: J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 67 and 68: J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 69 and 70: J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 71 and 72: J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 73 and 74: J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 75 and 76: J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 77 and 78: J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 79 and 80: J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 81 and 82: JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VO
- Page 83 and 84: SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 85 and 86: SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 87 and 88: SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 89 and 90: SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 91 and 92: SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 93 and 94: SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 95: SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 98 and 99: 5 - 2 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WES
- Page 100 and 101: 5 - 4 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WES
- Page 102 and 103: 5 - 6 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WES
- Page 104 and 105: 5 - 8 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WES
- Page 106 and 107: 5 - 10 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WE
- Page 108 and 109: 5 - 12 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WE
- Page 110 and 111: 5 - 14 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WE
- Page 114 and 115: 156O. Lexa et al. / Journal of Stru
- Page 116 and 117: 158O. Lexa et al. / Journal of Stru
- Page 118 and 119: 160O. Lexa et al. / Journal of Stru
- Page 121 and 122: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSJournal of Str
- Page 123 and 124: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 125 and 126: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 127 and 128: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 129 and 130: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 131 and 132: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 133 and 134: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 135 and 136: Table 1Statistical values of the qu
- Page 137 and 138: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 139 and 140: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 141 and 142: Table 2Summary of parameters derive
- Page 143 and 144: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 145 and 146: J. metamorphic Geol., 2008, 26, 273
- Page 147 and 148: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 275m
- Page 149 and 150: Probabi l irequencyProbabi l ireque
- Page 151 and 152: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 279y
- Page 153 and 154: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 281N
- Page 155 and 156: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 283w
- Page 157 and 158: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 285a
- Page 159 and 160: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 287w
- Page 161 and 162: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 289T
- Page 163 and 164:
EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 291O
- Page 165 and 166:
EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 293r
- Page 167 and 168:
EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 295B
- Page 169:
EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 297R
- Page 172 and 173:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 174 and 175:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 176 and 177:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 178 and 179:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 180 and 181:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 182 and 183:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 184 and 185:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 186 and 187:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 188 and 189:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 190 and 191:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 193 and 194:
J. metamorphic Geol., 2011, 29, 79-
- Page 195 and 196:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 197 and 198:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 199 and 200:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 201 and 202:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 203 and 204:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 205 and 206:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 207 and 208:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 209 and 210:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 211 and 212:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 213 and 214:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 215 and 216:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 217 and 218:
J. metamorphic Geol., 2011, 29, 53-
- Page 219 and 220:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 221 and 222:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 223 and 224:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 225 and 226:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 227 and 228:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 229 and 230:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 231 and 232:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 233 and 234:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 235 and 236:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 237 and 238:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 239 and 240:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 241 and 242:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 243 and 244:
J. metamorphic Geol., 2005, 23, 649
- Page 245 and 246:
CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 247 and 248:
CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 249 and 250:
CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 251 and 252:
CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 253 and 254:
CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 255 and 256:
CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 257 and 258:
CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 259 and 260:
CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 261 and 262:
Contrasting microstructures and def
- Page 263 and 264:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 265 and 266:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 267 and 268:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 269 and 270:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 271 and 272:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 273 and 274:
1.0--0.9__Mg~(Mg2++Fe2+)9 Core of p
- Page 275 and 276:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 277 and 278:
' ~'-----2~--~----TEXTURES OF NATUR
- Page 279 and 280:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 281 and 282:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 283 and 284:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 285 and 286:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 287 and 288:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 289:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 292 and 293:
B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 294 and 295:
B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 296 and 297:
B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 298 and 299:
B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 300 and 301:
B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 302 and 303:
B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 304 and 305:
B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 307 and 308:
ClickHereforFullArticleJOURNAL OF G
- Page 309 and 310:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 311 and 312:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 313 and 314:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 315 and 316:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 317 and 318:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 319 and 320:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 321 and 322:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 323 and 324:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 325 and 326:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 327 and 328:
J. metamorphic Geol., 2008, 26, 29-
- Page 329 and 330:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 31Ó 20
- Page 331 and 332:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 33durin
- Page 333 and 334:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 35(a)Ty
- Page 335 and 336:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 37(a)Pl
- Page 337 and 338:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 39Grain
- Page 339 and 340:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 41(a)(b
- Page 341 and 342:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 43(a)(b
- Page 343 and 344:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 45Fig.
- Page 345 and 346:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 47produ
- Page 347 and 348:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 49stron
- Page 349 and 350:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 51Cmı
- Page 351:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 53easte
- Page 354 and 355:
104 J. FRANĚK ET AL.in terms of th
- Page 356 and 357:
106 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Fig. 2. Struct
- Page 358 and 359:
108 J. FRANĚK ET AL.(a)perthite po
- Page 360 and 361:
110 J. FRANĚK ET AL.(a)(b)(c) (d)
- Page 362 and 363:
112 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Table 1. Repre
- Page 364 and 365:
114 J. FRANĚK ET AL.at these P-T c
- Page 366 and 367:
116 J. FRANĚK ET AL.(a)(b)Fig. 10.
- Page 368 and 369:
118 J. FRANĚK ET AL.(a)(b)Fig. 11.
- Page 370 and 371:
120 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Table 2. Quant
- Page 372 and 373:
122 J. FRANĚK ET AL.(a)(b)Fig. 15.
- Page 374 and 375:
124 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Fig. 16. Inter
- Page 376 and 377:
126 J. FRANĚK ET AL.development of
- Page 378 and 379:
128 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Behrmann, J.H.
- Page 380:
130 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Southern Bohem