10.07.2015 Views

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et al. / Journal <strong>of</strong> Structural Geology xx (xxxx) 1–24 52.2. Metamorphic zonalityThe Variscan metamorphic evolution <strong>of</strong> the study areainvolves two main phases; an M 2 metamorphism <strong>of</strong>Barrovian character with the intensity increasing westwards<strong>and</strong> an M 3 metamorphism induced by the Žulová graniteintrusion in the western margin <strong>of</strong> the Desná dome. TheBarrovian M 2 metamorphic grade ranges from chlorite zonein the eastern margin <strong>of</strong> the Desná dome up to staurolite <strong>and</strong>possibly sillimanite zone in the west. The M 3 periplutonicHT/LP overprint also attains its maximum in the westernpart <strong>of</strong> the studied area, where it is documented by thepresence <strong>of</strong> K-feldspar–cordierite migmatites (Rozkošný<strong>and</strong> Souček, 1989; Cháb <strong>and</strong> Žáček, 1994), as well as by thegrowth <strong>of</strong> sillimanite <strong>and</strong> new garnet in the staurolitemicaschists in the pluton aureole (Fig. 2).Although the metabasites cannot be precisely dividedinto particular metamorphic zones once they have reachedamphibolite facies conditions, it is nevertheless necessaryfor the purpose <strong>of</strong> this work to establish a metamorphiczoning <strong>of</strong> the amphibolite massif based on the increasingmetamorphic conditions. The metamorphic zones determinedin intercalated metasedimentary rocks by Souček(1978) are therefore extended into the adjacent metabasites<strong>and</strong> used as a reference for the definition <strong>of</strong> the metamorphicgrade therein. The justification for this procedure is based onthe mutual field relations <strong>of</strong> the amphibolites <strong>and</strong> metasediments,which indicate that both lithologies have experiencedthe same tectonic <strong>and</strong> metamorphic history(Schulmann <strong>and</strong> Gayer, 2000). Therefore, PT conditionswere determined in metasediments applying variousthermobarometry methods (Baratoux, 2004). The degree<strong>of</strong> metamorphism in the east <strong>of</strong> the metabasite massifcorresponds to the garnet zone in the contiguous metasediments<strong>and</strong> the mineral assemblage in the metabasitesincludes hornblende, plagioclase, actinolite, chlorite, <strong>and</strong>epidote corresponding to PT conditions <strong>of</strong> 540G10 8C <strong>and</strong>5G1 kbar. Further to the west actinolite <strong>and</strong> epidotedisappear <strong>and</strong> HblCPlGQtzCIlmCTtn, which correspondsto the staurolite zone, appears with metamorphicconditions <strong>of</strong> M 2 estimated to be 570G30 8C <strong>and</strong> 5.5G1 kbar (Baratoux, 2004). The mineral assemblage in themetabasites corresponding to the sillimanite zone isrepresented by HblCPlGQtzCIlmCTtn <strong>and</strong> AmpCPlGQtzGCpxGCalCIlmCTtn in calcium-rich lithologies <strong>and</strong>metamorphic conditions <strong>of</strong> this zone were estimated to590G20 8C <strong>and</strong> 5.5G1 kbar. In the pluton aureole,sillimanite–cordierite–K-feldspar assemblage occur inmetapelites <strong>and</strong> the PT conditions <strong>of</strong> periplutonic M 3metamorphism reached 700G15 8C <strong>and</strong> 4.2G0.8 kbar (Fig.2b). The mineral assemblage in the amphibolites correspondsto that <strong>of</strong> the sillimanite zone.The age <strong>of</strong> the main fabric-forming M 2 metamorphicevent is difficult to establish in the studied area, but it issupposed to have occurred during the main collisionalevent, which is dated elsewhere at w340 Ma (Schulmann<strong>and</strong> Gayer, 2000; Štípská et al., 2004). The termination <strong>of</strong>the D 2 –M 2 event can be constrained by Rb–Sr dating (335G7.5 Ma) <strong>of</strong> the crystallization <strong>of</strong> the Žulová granite(Jehlička, 1995). However, 40 Ar/ 39 Ar dating <strong>of</strong> muscovite<strong>and</strong> biotite from mylonitic gneisses <strong>of</strong> the Desná dome <strong>and</strong><strong>of</strong> the Žulová granite (Maluski et al., 1995) suggest thatcooling through the white mica <strong>and</strong> biotite closuretemperatures (350 <strong>and</strong> 300 8C, respectively) occurredbetween 310 <strong>and</strong> 300 Ma. Therefore, this age maycorrespond to the greenschist facies F 3 folding activity inthe east <strong>and</strong> to the cooling <strong>of</strong> the Žulová pluton to the west.3. D 2 <strong>and</strong> D 3 amphibolite microstructures acrossmetamorphic zones3.1. Eastern part <strong>of</strong> the massif (the garnet zone)In the eastern part <strong>of</strong> the massif, i.e. in the garnet zone,some weakly deformed metagabbros with large grains <strong>of</strong>hornblende <strong>and</strong> plagioclase (1–2 mm) are still present. Themain metamorphic fabric S 2 <strong>of</strong> amphibolites is preserved indomains unaffected by F 3 folding or in F 3 fold limbs <strong>and</strong> it ischaracterized by a strong mineral shape preferred orientation(SPO) <strong>of</strong> amphibole 0.2–3 mm in size (Fig. 3a). Thesegrains <strong>of</strong>ten show a strong chemical zonality with actinoliticcores <strong>and</strong> tschermakitic rims (Fig. 4a). Fine-grained (30–60 mm) sub-equant plagioclase (An 25–35 ) forms elongatepolycrystalline aggregates surrounded by laths <strong>of</strong> amphibole.These new grains develop from large relict clasts(An 40–50 ) (Fig. 4d). The plagioclase in these domainsexhibits features typical for dynamic recrystallization (in thesense <strong>of</strong> Poirier <strong>and</strong> Guillopé (1979)) such as undulatoryextinction, the development <strong>of</strong> sub-grain boundaries, <strong>and</strong> auniform grain-size distribution. However, a contribution <strong>of</strong>metamorphic nucleation is evidenced by the differentchemical composition <strong>of</strong> the host <strong>and</strong> the new grains(Rosenberg <strong>and</strong> Stünitz, 2003).In the hinge zones <strong>of</strong> F 3 micr<strong>of</strong>olds, amphibole grainswith irregular boundaries are commonly bent <strong>and</strong> broken(Fig. 3b). Micr<strong>of</strong>ractures associated with domainal undulatoryextinction fragment large grains into smaller elongatesegments. There is no difference in plagioclase microstructurein the non-folded foliation <strong>and</strong> in the crenulateddomains. It is concluded, therefore, that the main D 3deformation mechanism for amphibole is fracturing (in thesense <strong>of</strong> Nyman et al. (1992) <strong>and</strong> Stünitz (1993)) <strong>and</strong>passive grain rotation within the plagioclase matrix.3.2. Central part <strong>of</strong> the massif (the staurolite zone)In the eastern part <strong>of</strong> the central zone <strong>of</strong> the massifactinolite is still locally present in the cores <strong>of</strong> dark greengrains <strong>of</strong> magnesio-hornblende. Amphibole compositionfollows the pargasitic line (Fig. 4b) within the S 2 foliation.The size <strong>of</strong> the dark green grains <strong>of</strong> magnesio-hornblende113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!