10.07.2015 Views

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

290 K. SCHULMANN ET AL.top-to-the-NE-oriented thrusting in the stability field<strong>of</strong> cordierite at low pressures <strong>of</strong> 3–4 kbar.Structural <strong>and</strong> petrological studies <strong>of</strong> the southern<strong>and</strong> central Moldanubian domains show that similarP–T conditions around 7 kbar at 750 °C are characteristicfor all crustal levels during development <strong>of</strong> theflat S 3 fabric. Rocks from different depths were mixed<strong>and</strong> reworked together during the D 3 deformation, asevidenced by contrasting prograde P–T paths withdifferent pressure peaks. The increase <strong>of</strong> temperaturein the orogenic middle crust <strong>and</strong> the slight decrease <strong>of</strong>temperature in the orogenic lower crust during retrogressionsuggest a mutual thermal equilibration duringdevelopment <strong>of</strong> the S 3 flat fabric.Structural observations show that all rocks werestrongly deformed during D 3 horizontal flow, althoughmore competent lithologies, mostly middle crust <strong>and</strong>some granulites, retained their original steep S 2 fabric,whereas in the less competent, weak lower crust, thehorizontal top-to-the-NE D 3 ductile shearing dominates.During this process, the originally coherentorogenic middle <strong>and</strong> lower crust was disaggregated t<strong>of</strong>orm boudins <strong>and</strong> rootless folds in a pervasivelyflowing migmatitic matrix. We suggest that providingthe volume <strong>of</strong> orogenic middle crustal is high enough,the mineral assemblages from the D 2 vertical fabricsare preserved (Figs 6 & 9a). In contrast, the smallerboudins were completely re-equilibrated <strong>and</strong> evenheated in the flowing mass <strong>of</strong> hot orogenic lower crust(Figs 6 & 9b). The metamorphic conditions associatedwith the D 3 flow show clearly that pressure, temperature<strong>and</strong> intensity <strong>of</strong> D 3 reworking decreases fromsouth to north across the whole continental margin.Based on dating <strong>of</strong> metamorphic zircon from granulites,the timing <strong>of</strong> HP metamorphism <strong>and</strong> S 2 fabricformation in the Moldanubian domain was estimatedby Schulmann et al. (2005) <strong>and</strong> Tajcˇmanova´ et al.(2006) to occur between 350 <strong>and</strong> 340 Ma. This agespan corresponds with cooling ages <strong>of</strong> minerals withhigh blocking temperatures in the northern Moldanubi<strong>and</strong>omain (Matte et al., 1990; Macintyre et al.,1992), <strong>and</strong> indicates that already during the D 2 stagean important cooling <strong>and</strong> exhumation <strong>of</strong> this area wastaking place, similar to the Lugian domain. Theyounger 330–325 Ma 40 Ar ⁄ 39 Ar cooling ages obtainedfor muscovite <strong>and</strong> biotite imply a second distinct period<strong>of</strong> thermal reworking <strong>and</strong> isotopic resetting in theregion, correlated with the strong D 3 reworking in thesouth.Geophysical imagery <strong>of</strong> the subsurface shape <strong>of</strong> the Bruniacontinental promontoryIt is apparent that the thrust-related horizontal flow,which dominates the deformation <strong>of</strong> the Moldanubi<strong>and</strong>omain at around 325 Ma, does not exist in the Lugi<strong>and</strong>omain. This indicates a significant difference in thebulk exhumation processes between the two crustalsegments <strong>and</strong> the important involvement <strong>of</strong> the Bruniacontinent in the Moldanubian exhumation history. Inorder to discuss the relative contribution <strong>of</strong> the Bruniabasement in the tectonic evolution <strong>of</strong> the orogenic rootit is necessary to know the sub-surface extent <strong>of</strong> thebasement promontory underneath the orogenic rootrocks. Therefore, after the compilation <strong>of</strong> gravity data,a Bouguer anomaly map <strong>of</strong> the area (Fig. 10) wasproduced.At a large scale, the Bouguer anomaly map (Fig. 10)shows two main domains: (i) to the west, a domaincharacterized by low- <strong>and</strong> intermediate-gravity anomalies,inferred to be associated with rocks that have lowto intermediate densities; <strong>and</strong> (ii) to the east, a domainwith a succession <strong>of</strong> gravity highs inferred to be associatedwith significantly denser rocks. In the NE, thelow- to intermediate-gravity anomalies coincide withthe Lugian domain, whereas the gravity highs areassociated with the Brunia continent. The steep horizontalgradient in gravity reflects a steep boundarybetween the Lugian domain <strong>and</strong> the Brunia continent.In the SW, the Moldanubian domain west <strong>of</strong> theNNE–SSW-striking Central Moldanubian pluton ischaracterized by low- <strong>and</strong> intermediate-gravity anomaliessimilar to the Lugian domain. Similar to thenorth, we infer that the gravity highs over the Bruniacontinent in the SE represent mostly dense rocks.However, these gravity highs continue to the west, intothe eastern part <strong>of</strong> Moldanubian domain as far as theCentral Moldanubian pluton. Therefore, the observationmade in the north, where the gravity boundarycoincides with the geological boundary between theLugian domain <strong>and</strong> Brunia, is not valid in the south,where the geophysical boundary is located about 50–70 km west <strong>of</strong> the mapped geological boundary.Within the eastern Moldanubian domain, the rocksat outcrop are similar west <strong>and</strong> east <strong>of</strong> the SouthBohemian pluton, <strong>and</strong> rocks with high densities thatcould explain the gravity high in the eastern part <strong>of</strong> theMoldanubian domain are not represented at outcrop.Consequently, the dense rocks must be located at agreater depth. The gentle gradient <strong>of</strong> the gravity highsin the west indicates that the dense Brunia continentalpromontory dips towards the west, beneath the easternMoldanubian rocks. This interpretation is confirmedby preliminary 3D <strong>modelling</strong>, which shows that theboundary between the dense Brunia basement <strong>and</strong> thelow- to intermediate-density rocks <strong>of</strong> the Moldanubi<strong>and</strong>omain has a gentle dip down to a depth <strong>of</strong> some 2–3 km near the Central Moldanubian pluton, where itdips more steeply beneath the pluton (60–70°).Implication <strong>of</strong> Bouguer anomaly patternThis analysis <strong>of</strong> the Bouguer anomaly map in Fig. 10reveals striking differences between the Moldanubian<strong>and</strong> Lugian domains, which may be interpreted interms <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> Brunia basement under a thinlayer <strong>of</strong> Moldanubian rocks. This interpretation isconsistent with the suggestion that the S 3 fabric in theÓ 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!