10.07.2015 Views

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROGEN 55(a)(b)Fig. 1. (a) Principal divisions <strong>of</strong> the Variscan chain. RH, Rhenohercynian domain; SX, Saxothuringian domain; MO, Moldanubi<strong>and</strong>omain. (b) Simplified geological map <strong>of</strong> the Bohemian Massif modified after Franke (2000).Tepla´-Barr<strong>and</strong>ian domain consists <strong>of</strong> primitiveNeoproterozoic siltstones to greywackes <strong>and</strong> volcanicrocks deposited on an oceanic or transitional crust(e.g. Cháb & Pelc, 1973) <strong>and</strong> weakly metamorphosedduring the Cadomian orogeny (Kettner, 1918). ThisCadomian basement is unconformably overlain byCambrian <strong>and</strong> Ordovician to mid-Devonian sedimentarysequences that consist <strong>of</strong> greywackes, shales,s<strong>and</strong>stones <strong>and</strong> limestones. The Variscan tectonometamorphicprocesses are most pronounced in thewestern part, where they are restricted to 385–360 Ma(Fig. 2; Appendix S1). The boundary to the east withthe migmatites <strong>of</strong> the Moldanubian domain is markedby intense strike-slip deformation along the so-calledCentral Bohemian Shear Zone (Rajlich, 1988; Pitraet al., 1999; Scheuvens & Zulauf, 2000), however, thetrue contact is <strong>of</strong>ten masked by 375–336 Ma (Fig. 2)intrusions <strong>of</strong> the Central Bohemian Plutonic Complex(e.g. Zˇa´k et al., 2005a). The boundary betweenMoldanubian migmatites <strong>and</strong> the SW part <strong>of</strong> theTepla´-Barr<strong>and</strong>ian domain is marked by the so-calledWest-Bohemian Shear Zone (Zulauf et al., 2002; Do¨ rr& Zulauf, 2008).The Moldanubian domain corresponds to theinternal orogenic root zone <strong>of</strong> the Variscan orogen(Suess, 1926). It is intruded by numerous Variscanplutons ranging from I-type (e.g. specifically K–Mgrich syenites or calc-alkaline arc-related rocks, Janousˇeket al., 2000) to S-type granitoids (Finger & Steyer,1995). The Moldanubian–Brunia boundary is markedby a several-kilometres-wide zone <strong>of</strong> highly deformedme´lange derived from both the units (Konopa´seket al., 2002). The Moldanubian domain is traditionallydivided into three tectonic units (Fuchs, 1976). The<strong>structural</strong>ly deepest medium-grade MonotonousGroup is overlain by the medium-grade Varied Group<strong>and</strong> the <strong>structural</strong>ly highest high-grade Gfo¨ hl Unit.The Monotonous Group consists <strong>of</strong> biotite-plagioclaseparagneiss with minor orthogneiss, quartzite,amphibolite <strong>and</strong> locally eclogite bodies (Medaris et al.,1995; OÕBrien & Vra´na, 1995). It contains metagranitoids<strong>of</strong> Early Palaeozoic age (see Fig. 2), suggesting aPrecambrian age for the protolith <strong>of</strong> the surroundingparagneiss (Finger & von Quadt, 1995; Friedl et al.,2004). The Varied Group includes more pelitic protoliths<strong>and</strong> abundant amphibolite, quartzite, marble <strong>and</strong>Ó 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!