666 O. LEXA ET AL.clase thermometry. Contributions to Mineralogy <strong>and</strong> Petrology,116, 433–447.Kim, C.-S. & Rohrer, G. S., 2004. Geometric <strong>and</strong> crystallographiccharacterization <strong>of</strong> WC surfaces <strong>and</strong> grainboundaries in WC-Co composites. Interface Science, 12, 19–27.Kohn, M. J. & Spear, F. S., 1990. Two new barometers forgarnet amphibolites with applications to southeasternVermont. American Mineralogist, 75, 89–96.Koziol, A. M., 1989. Recalibration <strong>of</strong> the garnet–plagioclase–Al 2 SiO 5 –quartz (GASP) geobarometer <strong>and</strong> application tonatural parageneses. Transactions <strong>of</strong> the American GeophysicalUnion, 70, 493.Kretz, R., 1969. On the spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> crystals in rocks.Lithos, 2, 39–66.Kretz, R., 1983. Symbols for rock forming minerals. AmericanMineralogist, 68, 277–279.Kretz, R., 1994. Metamorphic Crystallization. John Wiley &Sons, Chichester.Kro¨ ner, A., O’Brien, P. J., Nemchin, A. A. & Pidgeon, R. T.,2000a. Zircon ages for high pressure granulites from SouthBohemia, Czech Republic, <strong>and</strong> their connection to Carboniferoushigh temperature processes. Contributions to Mineralogy<strong>and</strong> Petrology, 138, 127–142.Kro¨ ner, A., Sˇtı´pska´, P., Schulmann, K. & Jaeckel, P., 2000b.Chronological constraints on the pre-Variscan evolution <strong>of</strong>the northeastern margin <strong>of</strong> the Bohemian Massif, CzechRepublic. In: Orogenic Processes: Quantification <strong>and</strong> Modellingin the Variscan Belt (eds Franke, W., Haak, W., Oncken,O. & Tanner, D.), Geological Society, London, Special Publications,179, 175–197.Kruse, R. & Stu¨ nitz, H., 1999. Deformation mechanisms <strong>and</strong>phase distribution in mafic high- temperature mylonites fromthe Jotun Nappe, southern Norway. Tectonophysics, 303, 223–249.Leake, B. E., Woolley, A. R., Arps, C. E. et al., 1997. Nomenclature<strong>of</strong> amphiboles: Report <strong>of</strong> the Subcommittee onAmphiboles <strong>of</strong> the International Mineralogical AssociationCommission on new minerals <strong>and</strong> mineral names. MineralogicalMagazine, 61, 295–321.Lexa, O., 2003. Numerical Approaches in Structural <strong>and</strong> Micro<strong>structural</strong>Analyses. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Charles University,Prague.Lifshitz, I. M. & Slyozov, V. V., 1961. The kinetics <strong>of</strong> precipitationfrom supersaturated solid solutions. Journal <strong>of</strong>Physics <strong>and</strong> Chemistry <strong>of</strong> Solids, 19, 35–50.Marsh, B. D., 1988. Crystal size distribution (CSD) in rocks <strong>and</strong>the kinetics <strong>and</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> crystallization; 1, Theory.Contributions to Mineralogy <strong>and</strong> Petrology, 99, 277–291.O’Neill, H. S. C. & Wall, V. J., 1987. The olivine–orthopyroxene–spineloxygen geobarometer, the Nickel precipitationcurve, <strong>and</strong> the oxygen fugacity <strong>of</strong> the Earth’s upper mantle.Journal <strong>of</strong> Petrology, 28, 1169–1191.Parry, M., Sˇtı´pska´, P., Schulmann, K., Hrouda, F., Jezˇek, J. &Kro¨ ner, A., 1997. Tonalite sill emplacement at an obliqueplate boundary: northeastern margin <strong>of</strong> the Bohemian Massif.Tectonophysics, 280, 61–81.Peterson, T. D., 1996. A refined technique for measuring crystalsize distributions in thin section. Contributions to Mineralogy<strong>and</strong> Petrology, 124, 395–405.Poirier, J. P. & Guillope, M., 1979. Deformation inducedrecrystallisation <strong>of</strong> minerals. Bulletin de Mineralogie, 102,67–74.Powell, R. & Holl<strong>and</strong>, T. J. B., 1988. An internally consistentdataset with uncertainties <strong>and</strong> correlations: 3. Applications togeobarometry, worked examples <strong>and</strong> a computer program.Journal <strong>of</strong> Metamorphic Geology, 6, 173–204.Ramberg, H., 1952. The Origin <strong>of</strong> Metamorphic <strong>and</strong> MetasomaticRocks. University <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.R<strong>and</strong>olph, A. D. & Larson, M. A., 1971. Theory <strong>of</strong> ParticleProcesses. Academic Press, New York.Ridley, J. & Thompson, A. B., 1986. The role <strong>of</strong> mineral kineticsin the development <strong>of</strong> metamorphic microtextures. In: Fluid–Rock Interactions during Metamorphism (eds Walther, J. V. &Wood, B. J.), pp. 154–193. Springer-Verlag, New York.Schmidt, M. W., 1992. Amphibole composition in tonalite as afunction <strong>of</strong> pressure: an experimental calibration <strong>of</strong> the Al-inhornblendebarometer. Contributions to Mineralogy <strong>and</strong>Petrology, 110, 304–310.Schulmann, K., Mlcoch, B. & Melka, R., 1996. High-temperaturemicrostructures <strong>and</strong> rheology <strong>of</strong> deformed granite, Erzgebirge,Bohemian Massif. Journal <strong>of</strong> Structural Geology, 18,719–733.Seng, H., 1936. Die Migmatitfrage und der Mechanismusparakristalliner Pra¨ gung. Geologische Rundschau, 27, 471–492.Spear, F. S., Peacock, S. M., Kohn, M. J., Florence, F. P. &Menard, T., 1991. Computer programs for petrologic P–T–tpath calculations. American Mineralogist, 76, 2009–2012.Spry, A. H., 1969. Metamorphic Textures. Pergamon Press,Oxford.Sˇtı´pska´, P., Schulmann, K., Thompson, A. B., Jezˇek, J. &Kro¨ ner, A., 2001. Thermo-mechanical role <strong>of</strong> a Cambro-Ordovician paleorift during the Variscan collision: the NEmargin <strong>of</strong> the Bohemian Massif. Tectonophysics, 332, 239–253.Thompson, A. B., 1976. Mineral reactions in pelitic rocks: II.Calculation <strong>of</strong> some P–T–X (Fe–Mg) phase relations. AmericanJournal <strong>of</strong> Science, 276, 425–454.Turner, J. T. & Weiss, L. E., 1963. Structural Analysis <strong>of</strong>Metamorphic Tectonictes. McGraw-Hill, San Francisco, CA.Twiss, R. J., 1977. Theory <strong>and</strong> applicability <strong>of</strong> a recrystallizedgrain size paleopiezometer. Pure <strong>and</strong> Applied Geophysics, 115,227–244.Urai, J. L., Means, W. D. & Lister, G. S., 1986. Dynamicrecrystallization <strong>of</strong> minerals. AGU Geophysical Monograph,36, 161–199.Vernon, R. H., 1974. Controls <strong>of</strong> mylonitic compositionallayering during non-cataclastic ductile deformation. GeologicalMagazine, 111, 121–123.Voorhees, P. V., 1992. Ostwald ripening <strong>of</strong> two-phase mixtures.Annual Review <strong>of</strong> Materials Science, 22, 197–215.Received 3 June 2005; revision accepted 17 July 2005.Ó 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd248
Contrasting microstructures <strong>and</strong> deformation mechanismsin metagabbro mylonites contemporaneously deformed underdifferent temperatures (c. 650 ~ <strong>and</strong> c. 750 ~L. BARATOUX 1'2'5, K. SCHULMANN 3, S. ULRICH t'4 & O. LEXA t~Institute <strong>of</strong> Petrology <strong>and</strong> Structural Geology, Charles University,Albertov 6, 12843, Prague, Czech Republic(e-mail: Ika @natur.cuni.cz)2UMR 5570, ENS <strong>and</strong> Lyon 1 University, 2 rue RaphaYl Dubois,69622, Villeurbanne Cedex, France3Universitd Louis Pasteur, EOST, UMR 7517, 1 Rue Blessig,Strasbourg, 67084, France4Geophysical Institute, Czech Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Bo(n{ 11/1401,14131 Praha 4, Czech Republic5Present address." Czech Geological Survey, Klarov 3, Praha 1,11821, Czech RepublicAbstract: Deformation mechanisms <strong>of</strong> amphibole <strong>and</strong> plagioclase were investigated in twometagabbroic sheets (the eastern <strong>and</strong> western metagabbros from the Stars M~sto belt,eastern Bohemian Massif), using petrology, quantitative micro<strong>structural</strong> <strong>and</strong> electron backscattereddiffraction methods. After the gabbroic pyroxene was replaced by amphibole, bothgabbroic bodies became progressively deformed. The eastern metagabbros were deformedunder temperature <strong>of</strong> c. 650 ~ <strong>and</strong> the western metagabbros under c. 750 ~ Subgrainrotation <strong>and</strong> dislocation creep, characterized by strong crystallographic <strong>and</strong> shape preferredorientations, operated in plagioclase <strong>of</strong> the eastern belt during the early stages <strong>of</strong> deformation.Subsequent r<strong>and</strong>omizing <strong>of</strong> plagioclase crystallographic preferred orientation isinterpreted to be due to grain boundary sliding in the mylonitic stage. Large (50-150 ixm) grain sizes during the mylonitic stages are interpreted to be due to low strainrates. Amphibole is stronger <strong>and</strong> deforms cataclastically, leading to important grain sizereduction when the bulk rock strength drops substantially. In the western belt, plagioclasedeformed by dislocation creep accompanied by grain boundary migration (possibly chemicallyinduced) while heterogeneous nucleation <strong>and</strong> syndeformational grain growth inconjunction with dislocation creep were typical for amphiboles.Micro<strong>structural</strong> <strong>and</strong> rheological behaviour <strong>of</strong>natural polyphase rocks is a complex problem,which has been studied in detail mostly inquartzo-feldpathic rocks (e.g. Gapais 1989;H<strong>and</strong>y 1990). In these rocks, feldspars are generallyconsidered as strong minerals while quartzrepresents the weak phase. H<strong>and</strong>y (1994) proposeda scheme for rocks containing minerals <strong>of</strong> contrastingrheology with two end-members: load-beatingframework (LBF) <strong>and</strong> interconnected weak layers(IWL), based on the assumption that at least onemineral (generally the weaker one) is deformedby the mechanism <strong>of</strong> dislocation creep. Aspointed out by Jordan (1988) the LBF is notstable with increasing strain, resulting in mechanicallyinduced compositional layering. The strength<strong>of</strong> a two-phase material depends on the proportion<strong>of</strong> the weak mineral <strong>and</strong> on the rheological contrastbetween the two phases (Jordan 1988; H<strong>and</strong>y1990, 1994). However, if the deformation mechanismswitches from crystal plasticity to some grainsize sensitive process, the strength <strong>of</strong> the bulk rockdrops rapidly with respect to the preceding modeldue to strain s<strong>of</strong>tening (Knipe 1989). It was alsoshown that generally stronger feldspars maybecome even weaker than quartz if they deformby diffusional creep (e.g. Voll 1976; Simpson1985; Gapais 1989; Martelat et al. 1999).Equivalent comparative micro<strong>structural</strong> study<strong>of</strong> plagioclase <strong>and</strong> hornblende in naturally deformedmetabasic rocks as well as experimentalstudies <strong>of</strong> the rheology <strong>of</strong> amphibole-plagioclaseFrom: GAPA1S, D., BRUN, J. P. & COBBOLD, P. R. (eds) 2005. Deformation Mechanisms, Rheology <strong>and</strong>Tectonics: from Minerals to the Lithosphere. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 243, 97-125.0305-8719/05/$15.00 ~') The Geological Society <strong>of</strong> London 2005.249
- Page 3:
“It strikes me that all our knowl
- Page 8 and 9:
Contentsviii4.7 Schulmann, Konopás
- Page 11:
Dedicated to my wife Markéta, daug
- Page 14 and 15:
Foreword 2First topic “Quantitati
- Page 16 and 17:
Foreword 4source and freely availab
- Page 18 and 19:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 20 and 21:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 22 and 23:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 24 and 25:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 26 and 27:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 28 and 29:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 2Mechanisms of lower crusta
- Page 33 and 34:
2. Mechanisms of lower crustal flow
- Page 35 and 36:
2. Mechanisms of lower crustal flow
- Page 37 and 38:
2. Mechanisms of lower crustal flow
- Page 39 and 40:
2. Mechanisms of lower crustal flow
- Page 41 and 42:
Chapter 3Quantitative analyses ofme
- Page 43 and 44:
3. Quantitative analyses of metamor
- Page 45 and 46:
3. Quantitative analyses of metamor
- Page 47 and 48:
3. Quantitative analyses of metamor
- Page 49 and 50:
3. Quantitative analyses of metamor
- Page 51:
3. Quantitative analyses of metamor
- Page 54 and 55:
Bibliography 42Culshaw, N., Beaumon
- Page 56 and 57:
Bibliography 44sources and trigger
- Page 58 and 59:
Bibliography 46Skrzypek, E., Štíp
- Page 61 and 62:
Journal of Structural Geology 23 20
- Page 63 and 64:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 65 and 66:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 67 and 68:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 69 and 70:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 71 and 72:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 73 and 74:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 75 and 76:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 77 and 78:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 79 and 80:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 81 and 82:
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VO
- Page 83 and 84:
SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 85 and 86:
SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 87 and 88:
SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 89 and 90:
SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 91 and 92:
SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 93 and 94:
SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 95:
SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 98 and 99:
5 - 2 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WES
- Page 100 and 101:
5 - 4 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WES
- Page 102 and 103:
5 - 6 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WES
- Page 104 and 105:
5 - 8 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WES
- Page 106 and 107:
5 - 10 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WE
- Page 108 and 109:
5 - 12 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WE
- Page 110 and 111:
5 - 14 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WE
- Page 112 and 113:
5 - 16 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WE
- Page 114 and 115:
156O. Lexa et al. / Journal of Stru
- Page 116 and 117:
158O. Lexa et al. / Journal of Stru
- Page 118 and 119:
160O. Lexa et al. / Journal of Stru
- Page 121 and 122:
DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSJournal of Str
- Page 123 and 124:
DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 125 and 126:
DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 127 and 128:
DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 129 and 130:
DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 131 and 132:
DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 133 and 134:
DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 135 and 136:
Table 1Statistical values of the qu
- Page 137 and 138:
DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 139 and 140:
DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 141 and 142:
Table 2Summary of parameters derive
- Page 143 and 144:
DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 145 and 146:
J. metamorphic Geol., 2008, 26, 273
- Page 147 and 148:
EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 275m
- Page 149 and 150:
Probabi l irequencyProbabi l ireque
- Page 151 and 152:
EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 279y
- Page 153 and 154:
EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 281N
- Page 155 and 156:
EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 283w
- Page 157 and 158:
EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 285a
- Page 159 and 160:
EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 287w
- Page 161 and 162:
EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 289T
- Page 163 and 164:
EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 291O
- Page 165 and 166:
EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 293r
- Page 167 and 168:
EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 295B
- Page 169:
EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 297R
- Page 172 and 173:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 174 and 175:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 176 and 177:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 178 and 179:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 180 and 181:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 182 and 183:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 184 and 185:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 186 and 187:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 188 and 189:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 190 and 191:
Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 193 and 194:
J. metamorphic Geol., 2011, 29, 79-
- Page 195 and 196:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 197 and 198:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 199 and 200:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 201 and 202:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 203 and 204:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 205 and 206:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 207 and 208:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 209 and 210: HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 211 and 212: HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 213 and 214: HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 215 and 216: HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 217 and 218: J. metamorphic Geol., 2011, 29, 53-
- Page 219 and 220: EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 221 and 222: EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 223 and 224: EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 225 and 226: EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 227 and 228: EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 229 and 230: EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 231 and 232: EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 233 and 234: EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 235 and 236: EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 237 and 238: EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 239 and 240: EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 241 and 242: EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 243 and 244: J. metamorphic Geol., 2005, 23, 649
- Page 245 and 246: CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 247 and 248: CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 249 and 250: CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 251 and 252: CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 253 and 254: CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 255 and 256: CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 257 and 258: CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 259: CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 263 and 264: TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 265 and 266: TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 267 and 268: TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 269 and 270: TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 271 and 272: TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 273 and 274: 1.0--0.9__Mg~(Mg2++Fe2+)9 Core of p
- Page 275 and 276: TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 277 and 278: ' ~'-----2~--~----TEXTURES OF NATUR
- Page 279 and 280: TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 281 and 282: TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 283 and 284: TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 285 and 286: TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 287 and 288: TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 289: TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 292 and 293: B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 294 and 295: B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 296 and 297: B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 298 and 299: B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 300 and 301: B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 302 and 303: B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 304 and 305: B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 307 and 308: ClickHereforFullArticleJOURNAL OF G
- Page 309 and 310: B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 311 and 312:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 313 and 314:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 315 and 316:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 317 and 318:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 319 and 320:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 321 and 322:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 323 and 324:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 325 and 326:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 327 and 328:
J. metamorphic Geol., 2008, 26, 29-
- Page 329 and 330:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 31Ó 20
- Page 331 and 332:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 33durin
- Page 333 and 334:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 35(a)Ty
- Page 335 and 336:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 37(a)Pl
- Page 337 and 338:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 39Grain
- Page 339 and 340:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 41(a)(b
- Page 341 and 342:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 43(a)(b
- Page 343 and 344:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 45Fig.
- Page 345 and 346:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 47produ
- Page 347 and 348:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 49stron
- Page 349 and 350:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 51Cmı
- Page 351:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 53easte
- Page 354 and 355:
104 J. FRANĚK ET AL.in terms of th
- Page 356 and 357:
106 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Fig. 2. Struct
- Page 358 and 359:
108 J. FRANĚK ET AL.(a)perthite po
- Page 360 and 361:
110 J. FRANĚK ET AL.(a)(b)(c) (d)
- Page 362 and 363:
112 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Table 1. Repre
- Page 364 and 365:
114 J. FRANĚK ET AL.at these P-T c
- Page 366 and 367:
116 J. FRANĚK ET AL.(a)(b)Fig. 10.
- Page 368 and 369:
118 J. FRANĚK ET AL.(a)(b)Fig. 11.
- Page 370 and 371:
120 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Table 2. Quant
- Page 372 and 373:
122 J. FRANĚK ET AL.(a)(b)Fig. 15.
- Page 374 and 375:
124 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Fig. 16. Inter
- Page 376 and 377:
126 J. FRANĚK ET AL.development of
- Page 378 and 379:
128 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Behrmann, J.H.
- Page 380:
130 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Southern Bohem