10.07.2015 Views

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal <strong>of</strong> Structural Geology 23 2001) 1373±1392 1383the MeÏdeÏnec antiform. In this area, the S 2 fabric is completelyreworked into a steep to subvertical E±W trendingS 3 foliation. Here, a strong sub-horizontal stretching <strong>of</strong>quartz aggregates can be observed in several places. In thehinge zone <strong>of</strong> the MeÏdeÏnec antiform, monoclinal or conjugatekink b<strong>and</strong>s are developed affecting the early S 2 metamorphicfoliation <strong>of</strong> the garnetiferous micaschist <strong>and</strong>orthogneisses. These kink b<strong>and</strong>s exhibit E±W trendingaxes <strong>and</strong> kink planes, bimodally distributed with respectto ¯at-lying S 2 foliation Fig. 5e). The geometry <strong>of</strong> thesekink b<strong>and</strong>s suggests that they are genetically linked to theMeÏdeÏnec antiformal D3 structure but the mechanism <strong>and</strong> thekinematics <strong>of</strong> kinking will be discussed in a separate sectionbelow.The general structure <strong>of</strong> the studied domain is shown inblock-diagram Fig. 6), summarising lithological <strong>and</strong> <strong>structural</strong>observations discussed above as an effect <strong>of</strong> the D3folding superimposed on the D2 fabrics.6. Problem <strong>of</strong> the L 2 <strong>and</strong> L 3 lineation solved usingaggregate-shape analysisAn important feature is the parallelism <strong>of</strong> the L 2 minerallineation in the MeÏdeÏnec synforma D2 structure) with thelineation observed in micaschists <strong>and</strong> orthogneisses <strong>of</strong> boththe MeÏdeÏnec <strong>and</strong> the KlõÂnovec antiforms. If the WNW±ESEtrending L 2 lineation in the MeÏdeÏnec synformwere rotatedby late F 2 folding, the originally EW trending, gentlyplunging L 2 lineation would become subvertical Fig. 7).This can be observed in N±S trending, steep S 2 foliationin the southern part <strong>of</strong> the Oberwiesenthal structure. Subsequentrotation <strong>of</strong> the S 2 foliation by F 3 folds with a steephinge zone will keep the orientation <strong>of</strong> the L 2 in a subverticalposition Fig. 7) . The lineation in the steep limbs<strong>of</strong> the KlõÂnovec <strong>and</strong> the MeÏdeÏnec antiforms is always foundto plunge gently to the west, however, indicating that it wasformed during the D3 deformation L 3 lineation). Consequently,the change <strong>of</strong> the L 2 into an L 3 lineation must beassociated with complete modi®cation <strong>of</strong> the D2 fabricduring the D3 deformation. In order to investigate theproposed changes to the D2 fabric ellipsoid during the D3deformation, we have carried out a shape analysis <strong>of</strong> mineralaggregates in the orthogneisses fromthe MeÏdeÏnec synform<strong>and</strong> the MeÏdeÏnec <strong>and</strong> the KlõÂnovec antiforms.In order to determine the role <strong>of</strong> the F 3 folding inpossible fabric modi®cations, an aggregate-shape analysis<strong>of</strong> K-feldspar <strong>and</strong> quartz was carried out on the porphyriticorthogneisses. Selected porphyritic augen orthogneisseswere sampled in the hinge zones <strong>and</strong> limbs <strong>of</strong> both theMeÏdeÏnec <strong>and</strong> the KlõÂnovec antiforms, as well as in theMeÏdeÏnec synform<strong>and</strong> the Oberwiesenthal structure. Twosections in each sample were studied: a) perpendicular tometamorphic foliation <strong>and</strong> parallel to mineral lineation theXZ section <strong>of</strong> the ®nite strain ellipsoid), <strong>and</strong> b) perpendicularto both foliation <strong>and</strong> lineation the YZ section<strong>of</strong> the ®nite strain ellipsoid). The shapes <strong>of</strong> the K-feldspar<strong>and</strong> quartz aggregates were traced on transparent sheet,digitised <strong>and</strong> then analysed. Because <strong>of</strong> the large size <strong>of</strong>measured aggregates, only a limited number <strong>of</strong> measurementscould be carried out on each sample Table 1). Finitestrain ratios were calculated fromthe two principal strainellipsoid planes using a harmonic mean method Lisle,1977; Ramsay <strong>and</strong> Huber, 1983, p. 80). These ratios wereFig. 7. Succession <strong>of</strong> the lower-hemisphere equal area projections shows schematically expected evolution <strong>of</strong> the orientation <strong>of</strong> the L 2 lineation during D2 <strong>and</strong>D3 folding. Early L 2 lineation is trending E±W being subhorizontal. During late F 2 folding, the L 2 lineation does not change the orientation, but becomessteeper. The successive F 3 folding changes the orientation <strong>of</strong> steep S 2 foliation; the L 2 lineation should rotate into N±S direction maintaining its steep plunge.In the D3 structures the MeÏdeÏnec <strong>and</strong> the KlõÂnovec antiforms), however, the lineation is always E±W oriented <strong>and</strong> mostly subhorizontal.59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!