10.07.2015 Views

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

656 O. LEXA ET AL.Table 2. Summarized compositions <strong>of</strong> minerals used for thermobarometry.Sample Rock type Locality Grt Pl Amp Cpx Bt IlmXMg Alm Py Grs Sps An Compositional name a XMg Si (pfu) XMg XMg XIlmSamples associated with D1 Cambro-Ordovician structureLAC4a Grt-amphibolite 66 g 0.16–0.18 62–65 12–14 11–21 4–5 31–33 Ts, Fe-Ts 0.47–0.54 6.27–6.37 – – –LAC4b Cpx-amphibolite S149c – – – – – 44–50 Mg-Hbl, Ts, Ed, Prg 0.59–0.68 6.36–6.71 0.67 b – –LAC4c Melt patche within amphibolite S149f – – – – – 38–43 Ts 0.63–0.74 6.25–6.50 – – –TG1a Tonalitic migmatite S24-1b 0.10–0.11 55 (51) 7 (8) 28 (29) 6 (13) 33–35 Fe-Prg, Hs 0.34–0.37 5.8–6.2 – 0.34–0.36 –TG1b Tonalitic migmatite S24-5a 0.11–0.12 58 (50) 8 (6) 25 (31) 9 (14) 31–34 Fe-Prg, Hs 0.25–0.40 5.8–6.2 – 0.33–0.35 –TG1c Melt patche within migmatite S24-6e – – – – – 32–35 Fe-Prg, Hs 0.34–0.38 5.95–6.25 – 0.32–0.33 –MP1 Metapelite Heg3 0.15 (0.26–0.28) b 75 (69) 15 (26) 4 (4) 5 (1) 24–26 – – – – 0.50–0.53 0.95–0.98– – –6.1–6.37.7–7.96.0–6.35.30.46–0.670.48–0.500.82–0.880.64Samples associated with D2 Variscan structureGAHT Grt-amphibolite S33b 0.15 (0.05) 70 (57) 12 (3) 15 (27) 3 (12) 15–27 (15) Fe-Ts, TsCum– – –GHT3 Metagabbro S151 – – – – – 37–60 Ts,CumGLT2 Metagabbro S130 – – – – – 48–62 (25) Mg-Hbl, Ts 0.74–0.88 6.24–6.64 – – –T3 Granodiorite – – – – – 34–37 Mg-Hbl, Ts 0.54–0.64 6.3–6.7 – – –Values in brackets represent core compositions <strong>of</strong> zoned minerals. Notes: Alm ¼ 100 · Fe 2+ /(Mg + Ca + Mn + Fe 2+ ), An ¼ 100 · Ca/(Ca + Na + K), XMg ¼ Mg/(Mg + Fe 2+ ).a Amphibole compositional name from classification <strong>of</strong> Leake et al. (1997): Prg, pargasite; Ts, tschermakite; Ed, edenite; Hs, hastingsite; Tr, tremolite; Mg-Hbl, magnesio-hornblende.b XMg ¼ Mg/(Mg + Fe tot ).tine from the core to the rim (i.e. Alm 57 fi 70Grs 2 fi 15 Py 3 fi 12 Sps 12 fi 3 ; X Mg ¼ 0.05 fi 0.15).A relic magmatic assemblage in the eastern myloniticmetagabbro is represented by Pl + Hbl ±Cpx ± Ttn ± Ilm. Magmatic plagioclase (0.5–5 mm)shows zoning marked by a rimward increase <strong>of</strong>anorthite from 50 to 60%, whereas recrystallization <strong>of</strong>the plagioclase (0.05–0.1 mm) is accompanied by adecrease in anorthite content (i.e. An 45 ). Magmaticamphibole (0.5–5 mm) with pyroxene relics in thecores is magnesiohornblende (6.8–7.0 Si p.f.u., X Mg ¼0.72–0.77). Recrystallized grains (0.02–0.1 mm) correspondto magnesiohornblende with a slightly lowercontent <strong>of</strong> Si <strong>and</strong> X Mg (6.6–6.7 Si p.f.u., X Mg ¼ 0.69–0.74) in comparison with original grains.P–T conditions <strong>of</strong> Variscan metamorphismThe pressure <strong>of</strong> crystallization <strong>of</strong> the granodiorite (T3)was calculated as 6.5–7.0 kbar using the Al-content <strong>of</strong>amphibole (Schmidt, 1992) at a temperature <strong>of</strong> 670–725 °C inferred from the Pl–Hbl thermometer <strong>of</strong>Holl<strong>and</strong> & Blundy (1994). In the western mylonitemetagabbro the temperature was estimated as770 ± 50 °C using the thermometer by Holl<strong>and</strong> &Blundy (1994) in metagabbro (GHT3), while in garnetamphibolitethe temperature was estimated as 710–740 °C (GAHT). A similar temperature <strong>of</strong> 750 ±50 °C is reported by Baratoux et al. (2005) for 40amphibole–plagioclase couples. Pressure conditionsbetween 8 <strong>and</strong> 10 kbar were calculated only in Qtzbearinggarnet-amphibolite by means <strong>of</strong> the Kohn &Spear (1990) barometer. Based on 30 amphibole–plagioclase couples from the eastern mylonite metagabbro,Baratoux et al. (2005) estimated temperatureas 650 ± 50 °C using the Pl–Hbl thermometer <strong>of</strong>Holl<strong>and</strong> & Blundy (1994). The pressure could not becalculated because <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> garnet.Mineral textures <strong>and</strong> mineral compositions <strong>of</strong> rocks <strong>of</strong> theb<strong>and</strong>ed amphibolite complexMineral assemblages <strong>and</strong> selected mineral compositions<strong>of</strong> all study rocks are given in Table 1 <strong>and</strong> summarizedin Table 2, respectively.B<strong>and</strong>ed amphibolites are characterized by the mineralassemblage Amp + Pl + Qtz ± Cpx ± Grt ±Mag ± Ilm. Three types <strong>of</strong> microstructures marked bystraightened grain boundaries without indications <strong>of</strong>dynamic recrystallization are distinguished: (1) Equigranularaggregates (grain size 0.05–1.0 mm) <strong>of</strong>amphibole, plagioclase <strong>and</strong> quartz (Fig. 5a); (2)amphibole-rich layers alternating with elongateaggregates (grain size 0.05–1.0 mm) <strong>of</strong> quartz <strong>and</strong>plagioclase; <strong>and</strong> (3) coarse-grained aggregates (grainsize 1–5 mm) <strong>of</strong> r<strong>and</strong>omly distributed plagioclase<strong>and</strong> quartz sometimes with amphibole occur in meltpatches. In types (1) <strong>and</strong> (2) the mineral grains arealigned <strong>and</strong> elongated parallel to the compositionalÓ 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd238

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!