10.07.2015 Views

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED METAGABBROS 115maximum eigenvector V1 is only slightlyinclined with respect to the foliation, suggestingminor component <strong>of</strong> non-coaxial deformation. Inthe western belt, ramp_am p weakens from 2.26 inthe augen mylonite (W1) to 1.96 in the b<strong>and</strong>edmylonite (W2), being still stronger than rpl-plin similar rock types. The eigenvector V~ is parallelto the foliation in both types <strong>of</strong> mylonites.Crystallographic preferred orientationFive thin sections, covering all the deformationstages, were analysed using the EBSD technique.In the eastern mylonite (E2) <strong>and</strong> the westernb<strong>and</strong>ed mylonite (W2), two plagioclase domainswere investigated.Besides pole figures <strong>of</strong> [100] directions <strong>and</strong>poles to (010) <strong>and</strong> (001) planes, inverse polefigures, calculated parallel to stretching lineation<strong>and</strong> pole to foliation, are used in the eastern belt inorder to identify orientation maxima, which couldcorrespond to less common slip systems reportedin the literature. The inverse pole figures may beemployed because the orientations <strong>of</strong> lineation<strong>and</strong> foliation follow strong SPO <strong>and</strong> CPO <strong>of</strong>amphibole. For the description <strong>of</strong> inverse polefigures, only the slip systems previouslydescribed in the literature will be mentioned(for summary see e.g. Kruse et al. 2001 ; Sttinitzet al. 2003). The I parameters representing theintensity <strong>of</strong> CPO are shown in Table 5.PlagioclaseWithin the protomylonite <strong>of</strong> the eastern belt (El),the plagioclase CPO is not r<strong>and</strong>om (Figs 13 <strong>and</strong>14a). In the inverse pole figure, the lineations aredistributed subparallel to the horizontal planewith a maximum around [i 10]. Poles to foliationare arranged in a N-S girdle with maximaaround (001) <strong>and</strong> a* (100). The (001) [1 i0] slipsystem (Olsen & Kohlstedt 1984, 1985) couldTable 5. Intensity I <strong>of</strong> crystallographic preferredorientationE1 1.51tE2-pl 1E2-p12E3 2.906Wl 1.422W2-pll 0.948W2-p12HornblendePlagioclase(100) [001] {110} [1001 (010) (001)1.926 0.897 0.116 0.666 0.3190.095 0.109 0.1000.108 0.347 0.1711.591 1.454 0.083 0.033 0.1781.854 0.846 0.111 0.074 0.0201.606 0.653 0.457 0.552 0.9480.590 0.299 0.741thus be possibly active. The orientation <strong>of</strong> porphyroclastsis different from that <strong>of</strong> recrystallizedgrains, suggesting that the recrystallization wasnot host-controlled (e.g. Ji & Mainprice 1990;Kruse et al. 2001). The mylonite (E2-pll <strong>and</strong>E2-p12) shows weak CPO in both plagioclasedomains. A weak maximum <strong>of</strong> lineations is situatedaround [110] in the E2-pll _domain, <strong>and</strong> someclusters <strong>of</strong> lineation around [1_12] directions <strong>and</strong>poles to foliation close to (201) can be observedin the high-strain domain in sample E2-p12. Theseorie_ntationsmay indicate the possible activation <strong>of</strong>(201)1/21112] (Marshall & McLaren 1977a, b) inthe high-strain fine-grained domain adjacent to thehornblende porphyroclast (Fig. 4d). The ultramyloniteCPO (E3) displays maximum for polesto foliation clustering near the (021) <strong>and</strong> maximumfor lineations near the [112] direction. SuchCPO would suggest activation <strong>of</strong> (021)1/21112]slip system (Olsen & Kohlstedt 1984; Montardi& Mainprice 1987). The I parameters attain lowervalues in more deformed stages for [100], (010),<strong>and</strong> (001), respectively.The CPO <strong>of</strong> the augen mylonite in the westernbelt (W1) (Fig. 15) is very weak <strong>and</strong> no slipsystems could be extracted even by examiningthe inverse pole figures, which are not shownhere. Within b<strong>and</strong>ed mylonite (W2-pll <strong>and</strong> W2-p12), both coarse-grained (pll) <strong>and</strong> fine-grained(p12) plagioclase domains exhibit strong maxima<strong>of</strong> [100] directions close to the lineation. Polesto (010) <strong>and</strong> (001) planes are distributed close tothe pole <strong>of</strong> the foliation, which is defined by compositionallayering. The domain W2-p12 representslate shear zones marked by importantgrain refinement (Fig. 7c). The 1 parameters arehigher in the b<strong>and</strong>ed mylonite (W2) comparedto the augen mylonite (W1), indicating strengthening<strong>of</strong> plagioclase CPO. It is likely that thislate shearing was not entirely coaxial with respectto the main flow represented by coarse-grainedaggregate fabrics (W2-pl 1). Therefore, the difference<strong>of</strong> (010) <strong>and</strong> (001) maxima in pole figurescould result from slightly oblique orientation <strong>of</strong>late shear plane with respect to dominant compositionallayering. The shear zone (W2-p12) ismarked by an inclination <strong>of</strong> [100] maximum <strong>of</strong>about 10 ~ with respect to the lineation, whichcould be attributed to non-coaxial deformation (Jiet al. 1988). Activity <strong>of</strong> slip systems (001)[100](Marshall & McLaren 1977a, b) <strong>and</strong> (010)[100](Montardi & Mainprice 1987) may be inferredfrom such orientation patterns.AmphiboleSmall recrystallized hornblendes adjacent totheir host grain in the eastern protomylonite267

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!