DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESS24L. Baratoux et al. / Journal <strong>of</strong> Structural Geology xx (xxxx) 1–24Poirier, J.P., Guillopé, M., 1979. Deformation induced recrystallization <strong>of</strong>minerals. Bulletin de Minéralogie 102, 67–74.Pouba, Z., 1962. Vysvětlivky k prehledné geologické mapě ČSSR1:200,000, list M-33-XVIII, Jeseník (Legend <strong>of</strong> the geological map1:200,000, Jeseník). ČSAV, Prague.Price, N.J., Cosgrove, J.W., 1990. Analysis <strong>of</strong> Geological Structures.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Ramberg, H., 1961. Relationship between concentric longitudinal strain<strong>and</strong> concentric shearing strain during folding <strong>of</strong> homogeneous sheets <strong>of</strong>rock. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Science 259, 382–390.Ramberg, H., 1963. Fluid dynamics <strong>of</strong> viscous buckling applicable t<strong>of</strong>olding <strong>of</strong> layered rocks. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the American Association <strong>of</strong>Petrologists <strong>and</strong> Geologists 47, 484–505.Ramberg, H., 1964. Selecting buckling <strong>of</strong> composite layers with contrastedrheological properties, a theory <strong>of</strong> simultaneous formation <strong>of</strong> severalorders <strong>of</strong> folds. Tectonophysics 1, 307–341.Ramsay, J.G., 1967. Folding <strong>and</strong> Fracturing <strong>of</strong> Rocks. McGraw-Hill, NewYork.Ramsay, J.G., Huber, M., 1987. The Techniques <strong>of</strong> Modern StructuralGeology. Volume 2: Folds <strong>and</strong> Fractures. Academic Press, London.Rosenberg, C.L., Stünitz, H., 2003. Deformation <strong>and</strong> recrystallization <strong>of</strong>plagioclase along a temperature gradient: an example from the Bergelltonalite. Journal <strong>of</strong> Structural Geology 25, 389–408.Roth, Z., 1962. Vysvětlivky k prehledné geologické mapě ČSSR 1:200,000,list M-33-XXIV, Olomouc (Legend <strong>of</strong> the geological map 1:200,000,Olomouc). ČSAV, Prague.Rozkošný, I., Souček, J., 1989. Contribution to the petrology <strong>of</strong> the Žulovámassif mantle. Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geologica 2, 165–197.Schulmann, K., Gayer, R., 2000. A model for an obliquely developedcontinental accretionary wedge developed by oblique collision: the NEBohemian Massif. Journal <strong>of</strong> the Geological Society London 157, 401–416.Schulmann, K., Mlčoch, B., Melka, R., 1996. High-temperature microstructures<strong>and</strong> rheology <strong>of</strong> deformed granite, Erzgebirge, BohemianMassif. Journal <strong>of</strong> Structural Geology 18, 719–733.Souček, J., 1978. Metamorphic zones <strong>of</strong> the Vrbno <strong>and</strong> Rejvíz Series, theHrubý Jeseník Mts, Czechoslovakia. Tschermaks MineralogischePetrographische Mitteilungen 25, 195–217.Stabler, C.R., 1968. Simplified Fourier analysis <strong>of</strong> fold shapes. Tectonophysics6, 343–350.Štípská, P., Schulmann, K., Hoeck, V., 2000. Complex metamorphiczonation <strong>of</strong> the Thaya Dome; result <strong>of</strong> buckling <strong>and</strong> gravitationalcollapse <strong>of</strong> an imbricated nappe sequence. In: Cosgrove, J.W.,Ameen, M.S. (Eds.), Forced Folds <strong>and</strong> Fractures Geological SocietySpecial Publication, 169, pp. 197–211.Štípská, P., Schulmann, K., Kröner, A., 2004. Vertical extrusion <strong>and</strong> middlecrustal spreading <strong>of</strong> omphacite granulite: a model <strong>of</strong> syn-convergentexhumation (Bohemian Massif, Czech Republic). Journal <strong>of</strong> MetamorphicGeology 22, 179–198.Stünitz, H., 1993. Transition from fracturing to viscous flow in a naturallydeformed metagabbro. In: Bol<strong>and</strong>, J.N., Fitz Gerald, J.D. (Eds.),Defects <strong>and</strong> Processes in the Solid State; Geoscience Applications; theMcLaren Volume Developments in Petrology, 14. Elsevier, Amsterdam-NewYork, International, pp. 121–150.Vernon, R.H., 1976. Metamorphic Processes. Murby, London; Wiley, NewYork.Yund, R., Tullis, J., 1991. Compositional changes <strong>of</strong> minerals associatedwith dynamic recrystallization. Contributions to Mineralogy <strong>and</strong>Petrology 108, 346–355.132
J. metamorphic Geol., 2008, 26, 273–297 doi:10.1111/j.1525-1314.2007.00755.xVertical extrusion <strong>and</strong> horizontal channel flow <strong>of</strong> orogenic lowercrust: key exhumation mechanisms in large hot orogens?K. SCHULMANN, 1 O. LEXA, 1,3 P. ŠTÍPSKÁ, 1 M. RACEK, 2 L. TAJČMANOVÁ, 2,4 J. KONOPÁSEK, 2,3J.-B. EDEL, 1 A. PESCHLER 1 AND J. LEHMANN 11 Université Louis Pasteur, EOST, UMR 7516 - 7517, 1 Rue Blessig, Strasbourg 67 084, France2 Czech Geological Survey, Klárov 3, 118 21 Praha 1, Czech Republic3 Institute <strong>of</strong> Petrology <strong>and</strong> Structural geology, Charles University, Albertov 6, 128 43, Prague, Czech Republic4 Dipartimento di Mineralogia e Petrologia, Università di Padova, Corso Garibaldi 37, I-35 137 Padova, ItalyABSTRACTA large database <strong>of</strong> <strong>structural</strong>, geochronological <strong>and</strong> petrological data combined with a Bougueranomaly map is used to develop a two-stage exhumation model <strong>of</strong> deep-seated rocks in the eastern sector<strong>of</strong> the Variscan belt. An early sub-vertical fabric developed in the orogenic lower <strong>and</strong> middle crustduring intracrustal folding followed by the vertical extrusion <strong>of</strong> the lower crustal rocks. These eventswere responsible for exhumation <strong>of</strong> the orogenic lower crust from depths equivalent to 18)20 kbar todepths equivalent to 8)10 kbar, <strong>and</strong> for coeval burial <strong>of</strong> upper crustal rocks to depths equivalent to 8–9 kbar. Following the folding <strong>and</strong> vertical extrusion event, sub-horizontal fabrics developed at mediumto low pressure in the orogenic lower <strong>and</strong> middle crust during vertical shortening. Fabrics that record theearly vertical extrusion originated between 350 <strong>and</strong> 340 Ma, during building <strong>of</strong> an orogenic root inresponse to SE-directed Saxothuringian continental subduction. Fabrics that record the later subhorizontalexhumation event relate to an eastern promontory <strong>of</strong> the Brunia continent indenting into therheologically weaker rocks <strong>of</strong> the orogenic root. Indentation initiated thrusting or flow <strong>of</strong> the orogeniccrust over the Brunia continent in a north-directed sub-horizontal channel. This sub-horizontal flowoperated between 330 <strong>and</strong> 325 Ma, <strong>and</strong> was responsible for a heterogeneous mixing <strong>of</strong> blocks <strong>and</strong>boudins <strong>of</strong> lower <strong>and</strong> middle crustal rocks <strong>and</strong> for their progressive thermal re-equilibration. Theerosion depth as well as the degree <strong>of</strong> reworking decreases from south to north, pointing to an outflow <strong>of</strong>lower crustal material to the surface, which was subsequently eroded <strong>and</strong> deposited in a forel<strong>and</strong> basin.Indentation by the Brunia continental promontory was highly noncoaxial with respect to the SEorientedSaxothuringian continental subduction in the Early Visean, suggesting a major switch <strong>of</strong> plateconfiguration during the Middle to Late Visean.Key words: Bohemian Massif; channel flow; exhumation; orogenic lower crust; Variscan belt.INTRODUCTIONCurrent concepts <strong>of</strong> exhumation <strong>of</strong> deep-seated rocksin convergent orogens are generally based on the style<strong>of</strong> the pressure–temperature–time (P–T–t) pathretrieved from high-pressure (HP) to ultra-highpressure(UHP) rocks (e.g. Duchene et al., 1997). Onegroup <strong>of</strong> exhumation mechanisms for these rocks hasbeen inferred from conceptual or <strong>numerical</strong> modelsdriven by subduction–accretion processes that result ineither corner flow circulation within an accretionarywedge (Platt, 1986, 1993; Allem<strong>and</strong> & Lardeaux, 1997;Gerya & Stockhert, 2006) or buoyancy-driven exhumation<strong>of</strong> subducted continental crust (Chemendaet al., 1995). Another group <strong>of</strong> conceptual models hasbeen developed for gravity-driven exhumation <strong>of</strong> HProcks in thickened orogenic root systems. In thesemodels, processes such as convective removal <strong>of</strong> atectospheric root (Engl<strong>and</strong> & Houseman, 1988;Andersen et al., 1991) or lateral variations in gravitationalpotential energy <strong>of</strong> thickened continentallithosphere (Milnes & Koyi, 2000; Rey et al., 2001;V<strong>and</strong>erhaeghe & Teyssier, 2001) drive the exhumation.Recently, an alternative model has been developed forthe large-scale horizontal movement <strong>of</strong> melt-bearingmiddle crust based on channel flow (Beaumont et al.,2001, 2006; Godin et al., 2006), <strong>and</strong> has been appliedto explain the ductile extrusion <strong>of</strong> medium-pressuremetamorphic rocks along the Himalayan front (Grujicet al., 1996; Jamieson et al., 2002, 2004). Whereas thefirst group <strong>of</strong> models focuses on explaining verticaldisplacements <strong>of</strong> UHP <strong>and</strong> HP rocks, the second group<strong>of</strong> models emphasizes the importance <strong>of</strong> large-scalehorizontal displacements in orogens.Monocyclic continuous models <strong>of</strong> orogenic lowercrust exhumation may be supported by <strong>structural</strong> <strong>and</strong>kinematic field studies that emphasize the 2D character<strong>of</strong> the exhumation process (e.g. Milnes & Koyi, 2000).However, more commonly there are complexities inthe 3D character <strong>of</strong> the tectonic evolution <strong>of</strong> largeÓ 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 273133
- Page 3:
“It strikes me that all our knowl
- Page 8 and 9:
Contentsviii4.7 Schulmann, Konopás
- Page 11:
Dedicated to my wife Markéta, daug
- Page 14 and 15:
Foreword 2First topic “Quantitati
- Page 16 and 17:
Foreword 4source and freely availab
- Page 18 and 19:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 20 and 21:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 22 and 23:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 24 and 25:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 26 and 27:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 28 and 29:
1. Quantitative analysis of deforma
- Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 2Mechanisms of lower crusta
- Page 33 and 34:
2. Mechanisms of lower crustal flow
- Page 35 and 36:
2. Mechanisms of lower crustal flow
- Page 37 and 38:
2. Mechanisms of lower crustal flow
- Page 39 and 40:
2. Mechanisms of lower crustal flow
- Page 41 and 42:
Chapter 3Quantitative analyses ofme
- Page 43 and 44:
3. Quantitative analyses of metamor
- Page 45 and 46:
3. Quantitative analyses of metamor
- Page 47 and 48:
3. Quantitative analyses of metamor
- Page 49 and 50:
3. Quantitative analyses of metamor
- Page 51:
3. Quantitative analyses of metamor
- Page 54 and 55:
Bibliography 42Culshaw, N., Beaumon
- Page 56 and 57:
Bibliography 44sources and trigger
- Page 58 and 59:
Bibliography 46Skrzypek, E., Štíp
- Page 61 and 62:
Journal of Structural Geology 23 20
- Page 63 and 64:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 65 and 66:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 67 and 68:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 69 and 70:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 71 and 72:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 73 and 74:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 75 and 76:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 77 and 78:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 79 and 80:
J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal of
- Page 81 and 82:
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VO
- Page 83 and 84:
SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 85 and 86:
SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 87 and 88:
SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 89 and 90:
SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 91 and 92:
SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 93 and 94: SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 95: SCHULMANN ET AL.: STRAIN DISTRIBUTI
- Page 98 and 99: 5 - 2 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WES
- Page 100 and 101: 5 - 4 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WES
- Page 102 and 103: 5 - 6 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WES
- Page 104 and 105: 5 - 8 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WES
- Page 106 and 107: 5 - 10 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WE
- Page 108 and 109: 5 - 12 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WE
- Page 110 and 111: 5 - 14 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WE
- Page 112 and 113: 5 - 16 LEXA ET AL.: COLLISION IN WE
- Page 114 and 115: 156O. Lexa et al. / Journal of Stru
- Page 116 and 117: 158O. Lexa et al. / Journal of Stru
- Page 118 and 119: 160O. Lexa et al. / Journal of Stru
- Page 121 and 122: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSJournal of Str
- Page 123 and 124: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 125 and 126: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 127 and 128: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 129 and 130: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 131 and 132: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 133 and 134: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 135 and 136: Table 1Statistical values of the qu
- Page 137 and 138: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 139 and 140: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 141 and 142: Table 2Summary of parameters derive
- Page 143: DTD 5ARTICLE IN PRESSL. Baratoux et
- Page 147 and 148: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 275m
- Page 149 and 150: Probabi l irequencyProbabi l ireque
- Page 151 and 152: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 279y
- Page 153 and 154: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 281N
- Page 155 and 156: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 283w
- Page 157 and 158: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 285a
- Page 159 and 160: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 287w
- Page 161 and 162: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 289T
- Page 163 and 164: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 291O
- Page 165 and 166: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 293r
- Page 167 and 168: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 295B
- Page 169: EXHUMATION IN LARGE HOT OROGEN 297R
- Page 172 and 173: Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 174 and 175: Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 176 and 177: Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 178 and 179: Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 180 and 181: Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 182 and 183: Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 184 and 185: Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 186 and 187: Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 188 and 189: Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 190 and 191: Author's personal copyK. Schulmann
- Page 193 and 194: J. metamorphic Geol., 2011, 29, 79-
- Page 195 and 196:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 197 and 198:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 199 and 200:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 201 and 202:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 203 and 204:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 205 and 206:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 207 and 208:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 209 and 210:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 211 and 212:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 213 and 214:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 215 and 216:
HEAT SOURCES AND EXHUMATION MECHANI
- Page 217 and 218:
J. metamorphic Geol., 2011, 29, 53-
- Page 219 and 220:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 221 and 222:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 223 and 224:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 225 and 226:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 227 and 228:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 229 and 230:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 231 and 232:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 233 and 234:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 235 and 236:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 237 and 238:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 239 and 240:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 241 and 242:
EXTRUSIONOFLOWERCRUSTINVARISCANOROG
- Page 243 and 244:
J. metamorphic Geol., 2005, 23, 649
- Page 245 and 246:
CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 247 and 248:
CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 249 and 250:
CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 251 and 252:
CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 253 and 254:
CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 255 and 256:
CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 257 and 258:
CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 259 and 260:
CONTRASTING TEXTURAL RECORD OF TWO
- Page 261 and 262:
Contrasting microstructures and def
- Page 263 and 264:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 265 and 266:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 267 and 268:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 269 and 270:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 271 and 272:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 273 and 274:
1.0--0.9__Mg~(Mg2++Fe2+)9 Core of p
- Page 275 and 276:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 277 and 278:
' ~'-----2~--~----TEXTURES OF NATUR
- Page 279 and 280:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 281 and 282:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 283 and 284:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 285 and 286:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 287 and 288:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 289:
TEXTURES OF NATURALLY DEFORMED META
- Page 292 and 293:
B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 294 and 295:
B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 296 and 297:
B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 298 and 299:
B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 300 and 301:
B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 302 and 303:
B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 304 and 305:
B10210ZÁVADA ET AL.: EXTREME DUCTI
- Page 307 and 308:
ClickHereforFullArticleJOURNAL OF G
- Page 309 and 310:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 311 and 312:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 313 and 314:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 315 and 316:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 317 and 318:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 319 and 320:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 321 and 322:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 323 and 324:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 325 and 326:
B10406SCHULMANN ET AL.: RHEOLOGY OF
- Page 327 and 328:
J. metamorphic Geol., 2008, 26, 29-
- Page 329 and 330:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 31Ó 20
- Page 331 and 332:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 33durin
- Page 333 and 334:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 35(a)Ty
- Page 335 and 336:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 37(a)Pl
- Page 337 and 338:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 39Grain
- Page 339 and 340:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 41(a)(b
- Page 341 and 342:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 43(a)(b
- Page 343 and 344:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 45Fig.
- Page 345 and 346:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 47produ
- Page 347 and 348:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 49stron
- Page 349 and 350:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 51Cmı
- Page 351:
ORIGIN OF FELSIC MIGMATITES 53easte
- Page 354 and 355:
104 J. FRANĚK ET AL.in terms of th
- Page 356 and 357:
106 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Fig. 2. Struct
- Page 358 and 359:
108 J. FRANĚK ET AL.(a)perthite po
- Page 360 and 361:
110 J. FRANĚK ET AL.(a)(b)(c) (d)
- Page 362 and 363:
112 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Table 1. Repre
- Page 364 and 365:
114 J. FRANĚK ET AL.at these P-T c
- Page 366 and 367:
116 J. FRANĚK ET AL.(a)(b)Fig. 10.
- Page 368 and 369:
118 J. FRANĚK ET AL.(a)(b)Fig. 11.
- Page 370 and 371:
120 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Table 2. Quant
- Page 372 and 373:
122 J. FRANĚK ET AL.(a)(b)Fig. 15.
- Page 374 and 375:
124 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Fig. 16. Inter
- Page 376 and 377:
126 J. FRANĚK ET AL.development of
- Page 378 and 379:
128 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Behrmann, J.H.
- Page 380:
130 J. FRANĚK ET AL.Southern Bohem