10.07.2015 Views

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

J. KonopaÂsek et al. / Journal <strong>of</strong> Structural Geology 23 2001) 1373±1392 1391complex stress±temperature±time evolution Fig. 11). Asdiscussed above, the D2 structures are associated with westwardthrusting <strong>of</strong> the Lower Crystalline nappe over theSaxothuringian basement suggesting non-coaxial deformationwith E±W oriented s 1 direction.Strain analysis within D3 fold limbs indicates a N±Soriented horizontal compression s 1 <strong>and</strong> important verticalstress s 2 inhibiting elongation in the vertical direction.Then, the only elongation accommodating N±S horizontalcompression s 1 is possible in the horizontal E±W direction.This indicates an important role <strong>of</strong> rigid overburden forstresses acting in a low viscosity layer at depth. SubhorizontalN±S compression leads to lateral ¯ow <strong>of</strong> materialwithout the vertical component in the early stages <strong>of</strong>D3 deformation. The same stress regime, however, isresponsible for the formation <strong>of</strong> kink b<strong>and</strong> structures inthe hinge <strong>of</strong> the MeÏdeÏnec antiform. Kink b<strong>and</strong> structuresrepresent a brittle-ductile regime Dewey, 1965, 1969)<strong>and</strong>, thus, indicate a decrease in temperature under thesame orientation <strong>of</strong> the D3 stress ®eld. It is, therefore,suggested that the horizontal N±S compression operatedduring an uplift <strong>of</strong> the whole region fromthe deep to thesupracrustal level.The presence <strong>of</strong> D4 kink b<strong>and</strong>s must be associated withthe disappearance <strong>of</strong> horizontal stresses <strong>and</strong> increase insubvertical s 1 compression. If this change <strong>of</strong> stress regimewould occur at high temperature conditions, then the F 3folds would be refolded by large-scale ductile F 4 foldswith subhorizontal axial planes. Fig. 12 documents thatthe F 3 folding started at peak temperature conditions ca.6008C) enabling viscous buckling <strong>of</strong> the nappe sequencecaused by shortening in the N±S direction. This deformationphase continued during a temperature decreaseassociated with uplift, resulting in the development <strong>of</strong> D 3kink-b<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> a crenulation cleavage in the hinge zones <strong>of</strong>large-scale anticlines. The latest F 4 phase occurred underrelatively low temperature conditions <strong>and</strong> indicates thedisappearance <strong>of</strong> horizontal stress, allowing vertical shortening<strong>of</strong> steep D 3 fabric. These changes in stress can beinterpreted as an increase <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> overburden aftertermination <strong>of</strong> the D3 compressive stress.8.6. Exhumation <strong>of</strong> eclogites <strong>and</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong>extension in the Czech part <strong>of</strong> the KrusÏne hory Erzgebirge)MountainsIn contrast with the western Saxothuringian domain,where the boundary between eclogites-bearing nappes <strong>and</strong>supracrustal autochthon can be easily identi®ed, a similarlimit is dif®cult to establish in the eastern KrusÏne horyMountains. Using <strong>structural</strong> <strong>and</strong> petrological criteria, wehave de®ned the boundary between the parautochthonousSaxothuringian metasediments <strong>and</strong> allochthonous eclogitesbearingnappe. Thrusting-associated structures developed inboth the parautocthonous <strong>and</strong> allochthonous units documentthat the nappe emplacement occurred in the middle crust at adepth corresponding to 13±15 kbar. Field observations,however, are not able to provide any information aboutthe mechanism <strong>of</strong> emplacement <strong>of</strong> eclogites from a depthcorresponding to 26 kbar to the base <strong>of</strong> non-eclogiticorthogneiss nappe. This work shows mechanical behaviour<strong>of</strong> the crust during <strong>and</strong> after the nappe emplacement witheclogites as a part <strong>of</strong> lithological assemblage. The exhumation<strong>of</strong> assembled parautochthonous <strong>and</strong> allochthonous unitsto supracrustal levels is associated with complex <strong>structural</strong>reworking <strong>of</strong> originally simple fabric during the subsequentN±S shortening, which is responsible for the ®nal pattern <strong>of</strong>the central part <strong>of</strong> the KrusÏne hory Mountains in the CzechRepublic.There is a range <strong>of</strong> publications emphasising the role <strong>of</strong>the late Variscan extensional deformation for the ®naltectonic <strong>and</strong> metamorphic pattern <strong>of</strong> the German part <strong>of</strong>the eastern Saxothuringian domain Willner et al., 1994;Krohe, 1996, 1998; RoÈtzler et al., 1998). These interpretationsare based on regional distribution <strong>of</strong> metamorphicunits <strong>and</strong> orientation <strong>of</strong> shear structures in different areas<strong>of</strong> the Erzgebirge. In this study, we have examined a particularlysuitable area with steeply developed anisotropyaffected by vertical shortening <strong>and</strong> demonstrated that itachieves no more than ®rst percents <strong>of</strong> the bulk strain duringthis event. If the extensional tectonics would be a keyregime responsible for ®nal geometry <strong>of</strong> studied crystallinecomplexes then signi®cantly more important vertical shorteningshould be expected ®rst in areas with subverticallydeveloped anisotropy. Therefore, we suggest that the <strong>structural</strong>pattern <strong>of</strong> the whole Saxothuringian domain should bere-evaluated in terms <strong>of</strong> detailed <strong>structural</strong> analysis todemonstrate the real signi®cance <strong>of</strong> late orogenic extensionin this part <strong>of</strong> the Bohemian Massif.AcknowledgementsWe are very grateful to John Cosgrove for helpfulcomments on an early version <strong>of</strong> the manuscript. Thepaper has also bene®ted from the comments <strong>of</strong> G. Oliver<strong>and</strong> W. Franke. We also thank Jaroslav Synek for drawingFig. 6. This work was funded by the Grant Agency <strong>of</strong> theCzech Republic, grant no. 205/96/0279.ReferencesCobbold, P.R., Cosgrove, J.W., Summers, J.M., 1971. Development <strong>of</strong>internal structures in deformed anisotropic rocks. Tectonophysics 121), 23±53.Dewey, J.F., 1965. Nature <strong>and</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> kink-b<strong>and</strong>s. Tectonophysics 1,459±494.Dewey, J.F., 1969. The origin <strong>and</strong> development <strong>of</strong> kink b<strong>and</strong>s in a foliatedbody. Geological Journal 6, 193±216.Flinn, D., 1962. On folding during three dimensional progressive deformation.Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong> the Geological Society <strong>of</strong> London 118, 385±428.Franke, W., 1993. The Saxonian Granulites: a metamorphic core complex?Geologische Rundschau 82, 505±515.67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!