10.07.2015 Views

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

Quantitative structural analyses and numerical modelling of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32 P. HASALOVÁ ET AL.The onset <strong>of</strong> the exhumation process is dated byzircon U–Pb ages <strong>of</strong> c. 340 Ma on felsic granulites,migmatites <strong>and</strong> mantle-derived syn-tectonicallyemplaced plutons (van Breemen et al., 1982; Kro¨ neret al., 1988; Holub et al., 1997; Schulmann et al.,2005). Tajčmanova´ et al. (2006) assigned metamorphicconditions <strong>of</strong> 840 °C at 18–19 kbar <strong>and</strong> 760–790 °C at10–13 kbar to relict steep granulitic fabrics whichoriginated by vertical extrusion <strong>of</strong> lower crust. Theseauthors also estimated the conditions <strong>of</strong> re-equilibration<strong>of</strong> granulites associated with horizontal spreadingstage to 720–770 °C <strong>and</strong> 4–4.5 kbar. High pressurerocks <strong>of</strong> the Gfo¨ hl Unit are accompanied by largebodies <strong>of</strong> biotite–sillimanite Gfo¨ hl orthogneiss spatiallyassociated with K-feldspar–sillimanite paragneisses<strong>and</strong> leucocratic migmatites for which P–Tconditions <strong>of</strong> 7–10 kbar <strong>and</strong> 750 °C were estimated byRacek et al. (2006).The area <strong>of</strong> this study is located at the easternmosttermination <strong>of</strong> the Gfo¨ hl Unit (Fig. 1a). The main rocktype is represented by the Gfo¨ hl orthogneiss withprotolith ages 488 ± 6 Ma (U–Pb SHRIMP: Friedlet al., 2004) including small bodies <strong>of</strong> amphibolite,granulite, eclogite, ultrabasic rock <strong>and</strong> paragneiss. TheGfo¨ hl orthogneiss shows different stages <strong>of</strong> migmatizationcharacterized by the assemblage <strong>of</strong> Kfs +Pl + Qtz + Bt ± Grt ± Sill. This migmatizedorthogneiss complex is heterogeneously deformed bytop to the NE shearing along a large-scale, gentlydipping shear zone (Schulmann et al., 1994). Consequently,the northern margin <strong>of</strong> this complex is thrustover a footwall comprised <strong>of</strong> the Na´meˇsˇtÕ granulitebody <strong>and</strong> Neoproterozoic metagranites <strong>of</strong> the northeasterncontinental margin (Urban, 1992).STRUCTURAL EVOLUTIONMesoscopic structuresTwo major deformation events are recognized. Thefirst event (D 1 ) is represented by a steep, west-dippinghigh-grade foliation S 1 (Fig. 1b). This fabric is preservedin b<strong>and</strong>ed orthogneisses (type I), as an alternation<strong>of</strong> recrystallized monomineralic K-feldspar,plagioclase <strong>and</strong> quartz layers, separated by b<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong>biotite ± sillimanite (Fig. 2a). Lineation L 1 is locallymarked by alignment <strong>of</strong> biotite, sillimanite <strong>and</strong> byelongation <strong>of</strong> quartz <strong>and</strong> feldspar aggregates. Thisdeformation is attributed to an early stage <strong>of</strong> exhumation<strong>of</strong> the lower crust along a vertical channel(c)Type III(d)Type IV(b)Type II1 cm2 cm1cmd(a)Type Icba1cm1.0 mFig. 2. Schematic representation <strong>of</strong> the rock relationships at an outcrop scale <strong>and</strong> photographs <strong>of</strong> the individual rock types. (a) B<strong>and</strong>edorthogneiss (type I); (b) stromatic migmatite (type II); (c) schlieren migmatite (type III); <strong>and</strong> (d) nebulitic migmatite (type IV). Theposition <strong>of</strong> this outcrop in the study area is shown in Fig. 1b.Ó 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd318

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!