10.07.2015 Views

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

III. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND IMPACTSC. GEOLOGY AND SOILS1.7 REGULATORY FRAMEWORKMineral ResourcesThe Department of Mines and Geology identifies MRZs to describe the significance of mineraldeposits, and the State Public Resources Code requires that local governments considersignificant mineral resources in the planning process. Land use decision-making processes forareas with significant mineral resources on or adjacent to <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> lands must complywith code requirements to explain the potential effect of land use actions on future resourceextraction, and justify permitting uses in conflict with future extraction.Ground Rupture HazardsThe Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act (1972) regulates development near active faultswith the purpose of mitigating the hazard of surface fault-rupture. The principal focus of thelegislation is to prohibit the location of developments and structures for human occupancy acrossthe trace of active faults, as defined by the State Geology Board. For <strong>SFPUC</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> lands,the regulation would require specialized geologic reports defining and delineating surface faultrupturehazards prior to undertaking projects that would construct structures for humanoccupancy. The area along the Calaveras Fault Zone is designated as a special studies zone underthe Alquist-Priolo Act, and seismic hazards of surface rupture must be adequately evaluated forprojects that propose structures for human occupancy.2.0 IMPACTS2.1 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIAThe City has not formally adopted significance standards for geology and seismicity impacts, butit generally considers that implementation of the <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> wouldhave a significant geologic or seismic impact if it were to:! expose people or property to geologic hazards, such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides,ground failure, or similar hazards;! cause substantial flooding, erosion, or siltation;! change topography or ground surface relief features;! substantially modify any unique geological or physical features; or! preclude extraction of significant mineral resources.2.2 PROGRAM-LEVEL IMPACTSThis section discusses the potential impacts of implementation of the management actions in the<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> on geology and soils, including potential increases in soil erosion, reducedslope stability, exposure to seismic hazards, and changes to gravel mining operations.NOP 96.223E: <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> III.C-6 ESA / 930385January <strong>2001</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!