10.07.2015 Views

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONTABLE II-1 (Continued)SUMMARY OF ALAMEDA WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ACTIONS<strong>Management</strong>Action Number 1 Summary of <strong>Management</strong> Actions 2 PotentialAdversePhysicalEffectsAnalyzedin thisProgram-Level EIRMay RequireProject-SpecificEnvironmentalReview 3sta5sta6sta7sta8sta9Provide additional training for <strong>Watershed</strong> keepers and LRMS staff in enforcement and safetyprocedures and identification of activities that could degrade water quality. (Phase 1)Conduct water quality and ecological resources training for LRMS staff, operations supervisorsand crews, <strong>SFPUC</strong> UEB engineers, and project managers. (Phase 1)Conduct training classes for <strong>Watershed</strong> managers, <strong>Watershed</strong> keepers, and crew supervisors onthe management and protection of significant cultural resources. (Phase 1)Provide mandatory <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> training for all appropriate <strong>SFPUC</strong> staff tobecome familiar with this <strong>Plan</strong> and the required procedures. (Phase 1)Train selected staff and docents to provide meaningful interpretation of <strong>Watershed</strong> resourcesand to assist with community outreach. (Phase 1)No No NoNo No NoNo No NoNo No NoNo No Nosta10 Provide fire-related training to select staff members as appropriate. (Phase 1) No No Nosta11Establish an employee training program for safety and emergency response procedures.(Phase 1)No No NoFiscal Framework (fic)fic1fic2fic3Evaluate costs and benefits related to leasing, permitting, and public access activities on the<strong>Watershed</strong>. (Phase 2)Continue/authorize or modify/prohibit specific lease and/or permit activities based on the resultsof the cost and benefit analysis. (Phase 1A)Calculate the appropriate charges for lease activities and permit fees using the cost/benefitanalysis method discussed under Action fic1. (Phase 2)No No NoNo No NoNo No No_________________________1 Inclusion does not ensure that funding, staff, or equipment will be made available to implement these actions, nor does it obligate the <strong>SFPUC</strong> to implement actions it chooses not to.2 Phasing of the management actions is identified by one or more of the following categories: (1) Phase 1 – within 5 years of <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> adoption; (2) Phase 2 – within 10 years ofadoption; (3) Phase 3 – within 20 years of adoption; and/or (A) on an as-needed basis, and (B) at regular intervals throughout the life of the <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>.3 MEA would require examination of these actions, when proposed, to determine if further CEQA project-level environmental review of these actions were necessary.NOP 96.223E: <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> II-42 ESA / 930385January <strong>2001</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!