10.07.2015 Views

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I. SUMMARYcomprehensive set of goals, policies, and management actions that address all <strong>Watershed</strong>activities and reflect the unique qualities of the <strong>Watershed</strong>.In addition to serving as a long-term regulatory framework for decision-making by the <strong>SFPUC</strong>,the <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> is also intended to be used as a <strong>Watershed</strong> management implementationguide by the <strong>SFPUC</strong>’s Land and Resource <strong>Management</strong> Section (LRMS) staff. The <strong>Management</strong><strong>Plan</strong> provides the LRMS manager and staff with management actions designed to implement theestablished goals and policies for water quality, water supply, ecological and cultural resourceprotection, fire safety management, <strong>Watershed</strong> activities, public awareness, and financialmanagement. The <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> also enables LRMS staff to address and plan for futuremanagement issues such as fire management, erosion control, public access, security,development encroachment, construction and maintenance of utility facilities, and ecologicalresource management. Although the <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> has been developed with an effort todesign realistic policies and actions, it may be that due to funding realities or changedcircumstances, some actions may not be implemented or may be implemented at a later phase. Insuch cases the status quo would prevail.The <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> is presented in six chapters. An Introduction(Chapter 1.0) is followed by a discussion of Existing Conditions and Resource Sensitivity(Chapter 2.0). Chapter 3.0 briefly describes the major <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Issues.Chapter 4.0 takes the major management issue areas (established in Chapter 3.0) and describes<strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Goals and Policies for each of these management issue areas.Chapter 5.0 presents the actions and guidelines that form the basis of the <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong><strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>. Chapter 6.0 provides a discussion of Phasing and Implementation.The <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> was designed to improve the <strong>SFPUC</strong>’s ability toprotect its overall <strong>Watershed</strong> in general, and in particular the specific resources that make up that<strong>Watershed</strong>. Given the intention behind the <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> design, the overall environmentalimpacts of the <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> are beneficial. However, some actions also have the potential tohave significant adverse physical impacts on the environment. These management actions aredescribed in Chapter II, and the analysis of these actions forms the core of this EnvironmentalImpact Report (EIR).B. PRINCIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTSPrincipal among the issues addressed in this environmental impact report for the <strong>Management</strong><strong>Plan</strong> are the issues of increased public access and use, the expansion and extended timing ofmining north and south of Interstate 680 (I-680), ongoing operations and maintenance activities,and construction of new facilities. The impacts associated with the expansion and extendedtiming of mining north and south of I-680 were found to be significant and unavoidable withrespect to loss of prime agricultural land. The impacts associated with increased public accessand use and implementation of other management actions of the <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> were found tobe at a less than significant level or to be mitigated to a less than significant level with mitigationmeasures to be implemented by the <strong>SFPUC</strong>.NOP 96.223E: <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> I-2 ESA / 930385January <strong>2001</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!