10.07.2015 Views

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONTABLE II-1 (Continued)SUMMARY OF ALAMEDA WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ACTIONS<strong>Management</strong>Action Number 1 Summary of <strong>Management</strong> Actions 2 PotentialAdversePhysicalEffectsAnalyzedin thisProgram-Level EIRMay RequireProject-SpecificEnvironmentalReview 3gra9Implement monitoring to insure verification of completion of, or adherence to program plansand activities. (Phase 1B)No No Nogra10 Implement monitoring to assess program(s) effectiveness. (Phase 1B) No No Nogra11 Seek and procure funding for phased improvements <strong>Watershed</strong> Protection Areas through several No No Noexisting <strong>Watershed</strong> protection program funding mechanisms. (Phase 1A)gra12 Apply for funding of one or more of several State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loans available forNo No Nosource water protection, assessment, and monitoring. (Phase 1A)gra13 Direct funding to another agency, such as the RCD, for actual installation and construction of No No Noimprovements. (Phase 1A)gra14 Identify improvements to be accomplished by the tenants through a work-credit provision in theindividual leases. (Phase 1)No No No_________________________1 Inclusion does not ensure that funding, staff, or equipment will be made available to implement these actions, nor does it obligate the <strong>SFPUC</strong> to implement actions it chooses not to.2 Phasing of the management actions is identified by one or more of the following categories: (1) Phase 1 – within 5 years of <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> adoption; (2) Phase 2 – within 10 years ofadoption; (3) Phase 3 – within 20 years of adoption; and/or (A) on an as-needed basis, and (B) at regular intervals throughout the life of the <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>.3 MEA would require examination of these actions, when proposed, to determine if further CEQA project-level environmental review of these actions were necessary.NOP 96.223E: <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> II-48 ESA / 930385January <strong>2001</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!