10.07.2015 Views

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONTABLE II-1 (Continued)SUMMARY OF ALAMEDA WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ACTIONS<strong>Management</strong>Action Number 1 Summary of <strong>Management</strong> Actions 2 PotentialAdversePhysicalEffectsAnalyzedin thisProgram-Level EIRMay RequireProject-SpecificEnvironmentalReview 3aqu5aqu6aqu7aqu8aqu9aqu10aqu11aqu12aqu13aqu14Rehabilitate shoreline areas using structural shoreline protection practices in areas where erosionand sedimentation cannot be adequately controlled by land use restrictions. (Phase 1)Conduct a Sediment Transport Study to identify stream segments with excessive bank erosion orchannel sedimentation and prioritize segments for rehabilitation. (Phase 1)Rehabilitate stream segments according to the determined priorities, and return them to adynamic equilibrium where the channel is stable. (Phase 2)Establish and conduct long-term stream corridor monitoring to evaluate the effectiveness ofadopted protection measures and/or rehabilitation projects. (Phase 2B)Create new wetland habitat as part of a wetland mitigation banking system to offset impacts from<strong>SFPUC</strong> activities. (Phase A)Develop a sedimentation basin and stock pond management program in conjunction withpreparation of the HCP. (Phase 2)Once sediment detention basins are in place, establish monitoring, cleanup, and dredgingguidelines dependent on sediment loading rate. (Phase A)If needed for fire management, install long-term sediment retention basins that can be readilymaintained. (Phase A)In conjunction with development of the HCP and sedimentation basin management program,obtain a “blanket” Streambed Alteration Agreement (MOU) from the CDFG for development,operation, and maintenance of sediment detention basins. (Phase 2)Periodically update the Bathymetry Study for San Antonio and Calaveras Reservoirs to assessthe impacts of stream and sedimentation basin rehabilitation on reduction in sediment transport.(Phase 2B)Yes Yes YesNo No NoYes Yes YesNo No NoNo No YesNo No NoNo No NoYes Yes YesNo No YesNo No No_________________________1 Inclusion does not ensure that funding, staff, or equipment will be made available to implement these actions, nor does it obligate the <strong>SFPUC</strong> to implement actions it chooses not to.2 Phasing of the management actions is identified by one or more of the following categories: (1) Phase 1 – within 5 years of <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> adoption; (2) Phase 2 – within 10 years ofadoption; (3) Phase 3 – within 20 years of adoption; and/or (A) on an as-needed basis, and (B) at regular intervals throughout the life of the <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>.3 MEA would require examination of these actions, when proposed, to determine if further CEQA project-level environmental review of these actions were necessary.NOP 96.223E: <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> II-35 ESA / 930385January <strong>2001</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!