SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

VII. ALTERNATIVESTABLE VII-2 (Continued)COMPARISON OF IMPACTS OF ALAMEDA WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN ALTERNATIVESPreferred Alternative No Action Alternative Management PlanAlternative AManagement PlanAlternative BManagement PlanAlternative CFireManagement! Increased public use couldresult in increased potentialfor wildfire ignitions andhazards. Implementation offuel management planwould reduce threat ofwildfires.! Restricted access wouldresult in a lower potential ofwildfire ignitions and hazardsthan preferred alternative.Actions that reduce potentialimpacts could be proposed,similar to those proposedunder the preferredalternative. However,implementation of actionsmeasures would not occurunder a comprehensive plan.! If new facilities areconstructed, culturalresources could be impacted.Actions that reduce potentialimpacts could be proposed,similar to those proposedunder the preferredalternative. However,implementation of actionsmeasures would not occurunder a comprehensive plan.! Restricted access wouldresult in less potentialdamage to cultural resourcesthan preferred alternative.Actions that reduce potentialimpacts could be proposed,similar to those proposedunder the preferredalternative. However,implementation of actionsmeasures would not occurunder a comprehensive plan.! Restricted access wouldresult in a lower potential ofwildfire ignitions andhazards and less extensivefuel management would berequired than preferredalternative.! Greater access would resultin greater potential forwildfire ignitions andhazards than preferredalternative. Implementationof fuel management planwould reduce threat ofwildfires to same degree aspreferred alternative.! Increased public use wouldresult in greater potential forwildfire ignitions andhazards than preferredalternative. Fuelmanagement would be moreextensive than preferredalternative.CulturalResources! Construction of newfacilities could result incultural resources impacts.Measures to protect culturalresources would beimplemented.! Increased public accesscould result in damage tocultural resources.Measures to protect culturalresources would beimplemented.! Construction of fewer newfacilities would result in lesspotential for culturalresources impacts. Actionsto protect cultural resourceswould be implemented.! Restricted access wouldresult in less potentialdamage to cultural resourcesthan preferred alternative.Actions to protect culturalresources would beimplemented.! Construction of facilitieswould result in similarpotential for culturalresources impacts aspreferred alternative.Actions to protect culturalresources would beimplemented.! Public access allowed wouldresult in greater potential forcultural resources damagethan preferred alternative.Actions to protect culturalresources would beimplemented.! Includes the greatest numberof new facilities, resulting inthe greatest potential forcultural resources impacts.Actions to protect culturalresources would beimplemented.! Increased public accesswould result in greaterpotential for culturalresources damage thanpreferred alternative.Actions to protect culturalresources would beimplemented.NOP 96.223E: Alameda Watershed Management Plan VII-11 ESA / 930385January 2001