10.07.2015 Views

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

III. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND IMPACTSB. LAND USEavailable for review at the <strong>Alameda</strong> County Community Development Agency <strong>Plan</strong>ningDepartment.! <strong>Alameda</strong> County’s Findings, Statement of Overriding Consideration, and conditions ofapproval of SMP-32.! <strong>Alameda</strong> County’s Draft and Final EIR for SMP-32.! <strong>Alameda</strong> County’s conditions of approval for SMP-30.! <strong>Alameda</strong> County’s Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for SMP-30.! <strong>Alameda</strong> County’s conditions of approval for SMP-24.! <strong>Alameda</strong> County’s Initial Study and Negative Declaration for SMP-24.Actions 2a and 2b address the mining area south of I-680. These areas are currently permitted bySMP-24 and SMP-30. However, both Actions sun2a and sun2b (Phase 1) would requireamendments to these existing permits.Action sun2a calls for increasing the permitted pit depths to 200 feet and for maximizing themining footprint within the leased area. This action would create 47,100 acre-feet (AF) of waterstorage in five pits south of I-680, meaning that at project completion (by 2021) the landbordered by I-680/Calaveras Road and <strong>Alameda</strong> Creek would be primarily water storagereservoirs (see Figure III.B-3). Action sun2b would not amend the existing permit footprint butwould increase the depth of mining to 200 feet, thus creating 38,800 AF of water storage in fourpits (by 2014). As both options would require amendments to SMP-24 and SMP-30,environmental review of the permit amendments would be required to determine potentialsignificant impacts from mining activities and to identify mitigation measures.North of I-680, the <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (Action sun1) calls for completion of mining at the existingpermitted areas (SMP-32) by approximately 2035. Upon completion of mining, one waterstorage pit with approximately 16,100 AF of storage would remain in this area. Restoration andlandscaping of a quarter-mile buffer zone in the vicinity of the Sunol Water Temple would alsobe completed. Changes in the timing and sequence of mining and reclamation proposed by the<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> may require amendments to SMP-32 by <strong>Alameda</strong> County.Figure III.B-3 includes, schematically, the facilities described under management Actions sun3through sun22, which address the reservoirs, recreation use, and <strong>SFPUC</strong> facilities under miningOption sun2a. Facilities included under mining Option 2b would be similar to those shown inFigure III.B-3, although that option would include only four water storage pits south of I-680.1.4 NURSERIESExisting nurseries in the <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> are located in the Sunol Valley along <strong>Alameda</strong>Creek. The <strong>Alameda</strong> County Water District (ACWD) receives State Water Project water usingNOP 96.223E: <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> III.B-7 ESA / 930385January <strong>2001</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!