10.07.2015 Views

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IV. MITIGATION MEASURESG. FIRE MANAGEMENT1.0 MITIGATION MEASURES PROPOSED AS PART OF THE PROJECT1. In implementing any <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> management action that could result in significantphysical effects with respect to fire hazard from reduction of existing fuel breaks, as shownin Table III.G-1, ensure all applicable <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> management actions areimplemented that are necessary to reduce the impact to a less than significant level (seeTable III.G-1).2. In implementing any <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> management action that could result in significantphysical effects on fire management from increased public access and use, as shown inTable III.G-2, ensure all applicable <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> management actions areimplemented that are necessary to reduce the impact to a less than significant level (seeTable III.G-2).3. In implementing any <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> management action that could result in significantphysical effects from use of prescribed burns, as shown in Table III.G-3, ensure allapplicable <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> management actions are implemented that are necessary toreduce the impact to a less than significant level (see Table III.G-3).H. CULTURAL RESOURCES1.0 MITIGATION MEASURES PROPOSED AS PART OF THE PROJECT1. In implementing any <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> management action that could result in significantphysical effects on cultural resources from increased public access and use, as shown inTable III.H-2, ensure all applicable <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> management actions areimplemented that are necessary to reduce the impact to a less than significant level (seeTable III.H-2).2. In implementing any <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> management action that could result in significantphysical effects on cultural resources from operations, maintenance, and constructionactivities, as shown in Table III.H-3, ensure all applicable <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> managementactions are implemented that are necessary to reduce the impact to a less than significantlevel (see Table III.H-3). However, additional mitigation would be necessary to avoid apotentially significant effect (see Section IV.H.2.0, below).2.0 MITIGATION MEASURES PROPOSED AS PART OF THE PROJECT1. Any alteration of identified historic resources must be in accordance with the Secretary ofthe Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties.2. Demolition or removal of historic structures shall be prohibited.These mitigation measures, and measures discussed in Section IV.H.1.0 would reduce culturalresources impacts resulting from implementation of the <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> to a less thansignificant level.NOP 96.223E: <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> IV-5 ESA / 930385January <strong>2001</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!