SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONTABLE II-1 (Continued)SUMMARY OF ALAMEDA WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ACTIONSManagementAction Number 1 Summary of Management Actions 2 PotentialAdversePhysicalEffectsAnalyzedin thisProgram-Level EIRMay RequireProject-SpecificEnvironmentalReview 3Fisheries (fis)fis1fis2fis3fis4Maintain access for fish species of concern from reservoirs to upstream spawning grounds.(Phase 1)Identify all unauthorized stream diversions and remove those that are detrimental to fish passagein adherence to all existing regulations. (Phase 2)Ensure that any subimpoundments within perennial or intermittent drainages allow for fishpassage. (Phase 3)Consult with CDFG regarding the installation of fish screen and/or fish passage structureswhere stream alteration/diversion cannot be avoided. (Phase 2A)No No NoNo No NoNo No NoNo No Nofis5 In appropriate locations, allow accumulation of woody debris in stream channels, consistent with No No NoCDFG recommendations, to create pools and riffles, reduce bank steepness, and provide cover.(Phase 2)fis6 Identify and adopt alternative non-toxic management practices to protect aquatic resources.No No Yes(Phase 1)fis7 In conjunction with CDFG, control populations of predaceous exotic game fish. (Phase 3B) No No Nofis8 Conduct annual surveys of fish populations and habitat conditions in conjunction with watertemperature and water quality monitoring. (Phase 3B)No No No_________________________1 Inclusion does not ensure that funding, staff, or equipment will be made available to implement these actions, nor does it obligate the SFPUC to implement actions it chooses not to.2 Phasing of the management actions is identified by one or more of the following categories: (1) Phase 1 – within 5 years of Management Plan adoption; (2) Phase 2 – within 10 years ofadoption; (3) Phase 3 – within 20 years of adoption; and/or (A) on an as-needed basis, and (B) at regular intervals throughout the life of the Management Plan.3 MEA would require examination of these actions, when proposed, to determine if further CEQA project-level environmental review of these actions were necessary.NOP 96.223E: Alameda Watershed Management Plan II-36 ESA / 930385January 2001