10.07.2015 Views

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

III. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND IMPACTSH. CULTURAL RESOURCESprepared for SMP-32. Pertinent measures adopted by <strong>Alameda</strong> County as conditions of approvalfor SMP-32 include requirements for landscape plan approval and berming to provide a visualbarrier to the Sunol Water Temple. In addition, the <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>includes backfilling of an additional quarter-mile buffer after mining on the east side of SunolWater Temple, which is closest to mining activity, to provide additional mitigation for culturalresources impacts. Amendment of the existing permit, if required, would be subject to projectlevelenvironmental review by <strong>Alameda</strong> County.Options presented under Actions sun2a and sun2b would require amendments to existing permitssouth of I-680. The increase in mining depths proposed in both Actions sun2a and sun2b wouldnot be likely to impact cultural resources beyond levels previously analyzed and mitigated inprevious environmental documentation. It may be reasonably assumed that <strong>Alameda</strong> Countywould apply conditions of approval to the permit modifications consistent with those applied toSMP-24, SMP-30. These mitigation measures include requirements that dictate actions that mustbe taken if cultural resources are uncovered during earth removal. Amendment of the existingpermits would be subject to project-level environmental review by <strong>Alameda</strong> County._________________________REFERENCES – Cultural ResourcesExcept where indicated, references are on file at the San Francisco <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department.<strong>Alameda</strong> County <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Mission Rock Company SMP-24 Initial Study, 1985.(Available at <strong>Alameda</strong> County Community Development Agency <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department,Hayward, California)<strong>Alameda</strong> County <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Resolution R-86-62 conditionally approving SMP-24,1986. (Available at <strong>Alameda</strong> County Community Development Agency <strong>Plan</strong>ningDepartment, Hayward, California)<strong>Alameda</strong> County <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, incorporating and revising Resolution R-86-62conditionally approving SMP-24, 1991. (Available at <strong>Alameda</strong> County CommunityDevelopment Agency <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Hayward, California)<strong>Alameda</strong> County <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Santa Clara Sand & Gravel SMP-30 Expanded InitialStudy and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, 1992a. (Available at <strong>Alameda</strong>County Community Development Agency <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Hayward, California)<strong>Alameda</strong> County <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Resolution 93-32 conditionally approving Santa ClaraSand & Gravel SMP-30, 1992b. (Available at <strong>Alameda</strong> County Community DevelopmentAgency <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Hayward, California)NOP 96.223E: <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> III.H-17 ESA / 930385January <strong>2001</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!